Suppr超能文献

在基层医疗中,对新诊断为 COPD 的患者进行可能的哮喘-COPD 重叠综合征的识别。

Identifying possible asthma-COPD overlap syndrome in patients with a new diagnosis of COPD in primary care.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.

Department of Pneumology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Jan 5;27:16084. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.84.

Abstract

The asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap syndrome (ACOS) remains poorly characterised. Our aim was to describe an algorithm for identifying possible ACOS in adults with newly diagnosed COPD in primary care. General practitioners (n=241) consecutively recruited subjects ⩾35 years, with tobacco exposure, at least one respiratory symptom and no previous diagnosis of obstructive lung disease. Possible ACOS was defined as chronic airflow obstruction, i.e., post-bronchodilator (BD) forced expiratory volume 1/forced vital capacity (FEV/FVC) ratio<0.70, combined with wheeze (ACOS wheeze) and/or significant BD reversibility (ACOS BD reversibility). Of 3,875 (50% females, mean age 57 years) subjects screened, 700 (18.1%) were diagnosed with COPD, i.e., symptom(s), tobacco exposure and chronic airflow obstruction. Indications for ACOS were found in 264 (38%) of the COPD patients. The prevalence of ACOS wheeze and ACOS BD reversibility was 27% (n=190) and 16% (n=113), respectively (P<0.001), and only 6% (n=39) of the COPD patients fulfilled both criteria for ACOS. Patients with any ACOS were younger (P=0.04), had more dyspnoea (P<0.001), lower FEV%pred (67% vs. 74%; P<0.001) and lower FEV/FVC ratio (P=0.001) compared with COPD-only patients. Comparing subjects fulfilling both criteria for ACOS with those fulfilling criteria for ACOS wheeze only (n=151) and those fulfilling criteria for ACOS BD reversibility only (n=74) revealed no significant differences. Irrespective of the applied ACOS definition, no significant difference in life-time tobacco exposure was found between ACOS- and COPD-only patients. In subjects with a new diagnosis of COPD, the prevalence of ACOS is high. When screening for COPD in general practice among patients with no previous diagnosis of obstructive lung disease, patients with possible ACOS may be identified by self-reported wheeze and/or BD reversibility.

摘要

哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)重叠综合征(ACOS)仍未得到充分描述。我们的目的是描述一种在初级保健中识别新诊断为 COPD 的成年人中可能的 ACOS 的算法。全科医生(n=241)连续招募了 ⩾35 岁、有烟草暴露史、至少有一个呼吸道症状且没有阻塞性肺疾病既往诊断的患者。可能的 ACOS 定义为慢性气流受限,即支气管扩张剂后(BD)用力呼气量 1/用力肺活量(FEV/FVC)<0.70,同时伴有喘息(ACOS 喘息)和/或 BD 显著可逆性(ACOS BD 可逆性)。在筛选的 3875 名患者中(50%为女性,平均年龄 57 岁),有 700 名(18.1%)被诊断为 COPD,即症状、烟草暴露和慢性气流受限。在 264 名(38%)COPD 患者中发现了 ACOS 的指征。ACOS 喘息和 ACOS BD 可逆性的患病率分别为 27%(n=190)和 16%(n=113)(P<0.001),只有 6%(n=39)的 COPD 患者符合 ACOS 的两个标准。任何 ACOS 的患者年龄较小(P=0.04),呼吸困难更严重(P<0.001),FEV%预测值更低(67% vs. 74%;P<0.001),FEV/FVC 比值更低(P=0.001)。与仅 COPD 患者相比,同时符合 ACOS 两个标准的患者与仅符合 ACOS 喘息标准的患者(n=151)和仅符合 ACOS BD 可逆性标准的患者(n=74)之间无显著差异。无论应用何种 ACOS 定义,ACOS 患者和仅 COPD 患者的终生吸烟量均无显著差异。在新诊断为 COPD 的患者中,ACOS 的患病率较高。在普通科医生中筛查无阻塞性肺疾病既往诊断的患者时,通过自我报告的喘息和/或 BD 可逆性可识别可能的 ACOS 患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9a7/5214698/b3637c2740ed/npjpcrm201684-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验