• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结肠镜检查准备中的定制移动应用程序:一项随机对照试验。

A Customized Mobile Application in Colonoscopy Preparation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Sharara Ala I, Chalhoub Jean M, Beydoun Maya, Shayto Rani H, Chehab Hamed, Harb Ali H, Mourad Fadi H, Sarkis Fayez S

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan 5;8(1):e211. doi: 10.1038/ctg.2016.65.

DOI:10.1038/ctg.2016.65
PMID:28055031
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5288599/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Adherence with diet and prescribed purgative is essential for proper cleansing with low-volume bowel preparations. The aim of this work was to assess the effect of a customized mobile application (App) on adherence and quality of bowel preparation.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty (160) eligible patients scheduled for elective colonoscopy were randomly assigned to paper (control) or App-based instructions. The preparation consisted of low-fiber diet for 2 days, clear fluids for one day and split-dose sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPS). Before colonoscopy, information was collected regarding adherence with, and utility of the provided instructions. The colonoscopists, blinded to assignment, graded bowel preparation using the Aronchick, Ottawa, and Chicago preparation scales. The primary endpoint was adherence with instructions. Quality of preparation was a secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

No difference in overall adherence or bowel cleanliness was observed between the study arms. Adherence was reported in 82.4% of App vs. 73.4% of controls (P=0.40). An adequate bowel preparation on the Aronchick scale was noted in 77.2 vs. 82.5%, respectively (P=0.68). Mean scores on the Ottawa and Chicago scales were also similar. Gender, age, time of colonoscopy, and BMI did not influence preparation or adherence. Compliance with the clear fluid diet component was noted in 94% of patients with BMI<30 vs. 77% with BMI≥30 (P<0.01). SPS was well tolerated by 81.9% of patients. The App was user-friendly and received higher overall rating in this respect than paper instructions (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

SPS is well tolerated and effective for bowel cleansing regardless of instruction method. Customized smartphone applications are effective, well-accepted and could replace standard paper instructions for bowel preparation.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02410720.

摘要

目的

坚持饮食和按规定服用泻药对于使用低容量肠道准备剂进行适当清洁至关重要。本研究的目的是评估定制移动应用程序(App)对肠道准备依从性和质量的影响。

方法

160例计划进行择期结肠镜检查的合格患者被随机分配至纸质(对照)组或基于App的指导组。准备措施包括2天低纤维饮食、1天清流饮食以及分剂量服用比沙可啶钠/枸橼酸镁(SPS)。在结肠镜检查前,收集有关对所提供指导的依从性和实用性的信息。结肠镜检查医生在不知道分组情况的前提下,使用阿隆奇克、渥太华和芝加哥准备量表对肠道准备情况进行分级。主要终点是对指导的依从性。准备质量是次要终点。

结果

研究组之间在总体依从性或肠道清洁度方面未观察到差异。报告显示,使用App组的依从率为82.4%,对照组为73.4%(P=0.40)。阿隆奇克量表显示肠道准备充分的比例分别为77.2%和82.5%(P=0.68)。渥太华和芝加哥量表的平均得分也相似。性别、年龄、结肠镜检查时间和体重指数均未影响准备情况或依从性。体重指数<30的患者中94%遵守了清流饮食部分,而体重指数≥30的患者中这一比例为77%(P<0.01)。81.9%的患者对SPS耐受性良好。该App用户友好,在这方面获得的总体评分高于纸质指导(P<0.01)。

结论

无论采用何种指导方法,SPS耐受性良好且对肠道清洁有效。定制的智能手机应用程序有效且易于接受,可替代肠道准备的标准纸质指导。ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02410720。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ec6/5288599/73871a5268c3/ctg201665f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ec6/5288599/2929783bd594/ctg201665f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ec6/5288599/1e90f9360923/ctg201665f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ec6/5288599/73871a5268c3/ctg201665f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ec6/5288599/2929783bd594/ctg201665f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ec6/5288599/1e90f9360923/ctg201665f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ec6/5288599/73871a5268c3/ctg201665f3.jpg

相似文献

1
A Customized Mobile Application in Colonoscopy Preparation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.结肠镜检查准备中的定制移动应用程序:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan 5;8(1):e211. doi: 10.1038/ctg.2016.65.
2
Effects of a Personalized Smartphone App on Bowel Preparation Quality: Randomized Controlled Trial.个性化智能手机应用对肠道准备质量的影响:随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Aug 19;9(8):e26703. doi: 10.2196/26703.
3
Comparison Between Same-Day and Split-Dose Preparations with Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate: A Randomized Noninferiority Study.匹可硫酸钠/柠檬酸镁同日服用制剂与分剂量制剂的比较:一项随机非劣效性研究
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Aug;67(8):3964-3975. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07265-y. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
4
Improving the quality of bowel preparation through an app for inpatients undergoing colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial.通过为接受结肠镜检查的住院患者开发的应用程序提高肠道准备质量:一项随机对照试验。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Apr;76(4):1037-1045. doi: 10.1111/jan.14295. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate for Bowel Preparation in a Physically Disabled Outpatient Population: A Randomized, Endoscopist-Blinded Comparison With Ascorbic Acid-Enriched Polyethylene Glycol Solution Plus Bisacodyl (The PICO-MOVI Study).在身体残疾的门诊人群中,以聚乙二醇电解质溶液联合比沙可啶作为对照,评价匹可硫酸钠/柠檬酸镁进行肠道准备的疗效和安全性:一项随机、内镜医师设盲比较的研究(PICO-MOVI 研究)。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Feb;61(2):239-249. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000956.
6
Smartphone Application to Reinforce Education Increases High-Quality Preparation for Colorectal Cancer Screening Colonoscopies in a Randomized Trial.智能手机应用强化教育可提高随机试验中结直肠癌筛查结肠镜检查的高质量准备率。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Feb;19(2):331-338.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.03.051. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
7
A multicenter randomized phase 4 trial comparing sodium picosulphate plus magnesium citrate vs. polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for bowel preparation before colonoscopy. The PRECOL trial.一项多中心随机4期试验,比较比沙可啶钠加枸橼酸镁与聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸用于结肠镜检查前肠道准备。PRECOL试验。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 8;9:1013804. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1013804. eCollection 2022.
8
A dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser administered the day before colonoscopy: results from the SEE CLEAR II study.结肠镜检查前一天给予的双效、低容量肠道清洁剂:SEE CLEAR II 研究结果。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar;108(3):401-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.441. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
9
Delivery of Instructions via Mobile Social Media App Increases Quality of Bowel Preparation.通过移动社交媒体应用程序提供说明可提高肠道准备质量。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Mar;14(3):429-435.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.09.038. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
10
Randomized controlled trial comparing efficacy and acceptability of split- and standard-dose sodium picosulfate plus magnesium citrate for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy.比较分剂量和标准剂量的聚乙二醇硫酸钠加枸橼酸镁用于结肠镜检查前肠道准备的疗效和可接受性的随机对照试验。
Endoscopy. 2014 Aug;46(8):662-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365800. Epub 2014 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Patient Education for Colonoscopy Preparation: Strategies, Tools, and Best Practices.加强结肠镜检查准备的患者教育:策略、工具和最佳实践。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 19;14(12):4375. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124375.
2
Think-Aloud Testing of a Companion App for Colonoscopy Examinations: Usability Study.结肠镜检查辅助应用程序的有声思维测试:可用性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Feb 12;12:e67043. doi: 10.2196/67043.
3
Enhancing bowel preparation quality and tolerability in a low health literacy population in Western China: a multicenter randomized trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Sensory characterization of bowel cleansing solutions.肠道清洁溶液的感官特性
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Aug 10;8(15):508-16. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i15.508.
2
The burden of bowel preparations in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy.择期结肠镜检查患者的肠道准备负担。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Apr;4(2):314-8. doi: 10.1177/2050640615594550. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
3
Body mass index and quality of bowel preparation: Real life vs. clinical trials.体重指数与肠道准备质量:现实生活与临床试验对比
提高中国西部低健康素养人群的肠道准备质量和耐受性:一项多中心随机试验。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Dec;149(20):17957-17971. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05493-5. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
4
Impact of WeChat guidance on bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a quasi-experiment study.微信指导对结肠镜检查肠道准备的影响:一项准实验研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 18;13(1):11553. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37435-z.
5
Effectiveness of bowel preparation innovative technology instructions (BPITIs) on clinical outcomes among patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肠道准备创新技术指导(BPITIs)对结肠镜检查患者临床结局的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 4;13(1):10783. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37044-w.
6
The impact of smartphone applications on bowel preparation, compliance with appointments, cost-effectiveness, and patients' quality of life for the colonoscopy process: A scoping review.智能手机应用程序对结肠镜检查过程中肠道准备、预约依从性、成本效益和患者生活质量的影响:范围综述。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar-Apr;29(2):71-87. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_207_22.
7
Alleviating Pregastroscopy Anxiety Using Mobile Social Media Application.使用移动社交媒体应用缓解胃镜检查前焦虑
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 22;9:855892. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.855892. eCollection 2022.
8
Relationship between Health Literacy and Knowledge, Compliance with Bowel Preparation, and Bowel Cleanliness in Older Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy.老年患者结肠镜检查中健康素养与知识、依从性、肠道清洁度的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 25;19(5):2676. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052676.
9
Effectiveness of Digital Counseling Environments on Anxiety, Depression, and Adherence to Treatment Among Patients Who Are Chronically Ill: Systematic Review.数字咨询环境对慢性病患者的焦虑、抑郁和治疗依从性的有效性:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 6;24(1):e30077. doi: 10.2196/30077.
10
Comparative Effectiveness of Enhanced Patient Instructions for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: Network Meta-analysis of 23 Randomized Controlled Trials.增强版患者肠道准备指导在结肠镜检查前的应用效果比较:23 项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 25;23(10):e19915. doi: 10.2196/19915.
Arab J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar;17(1):11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajg.2015.12.001. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
4
Regime for Bowel Preparation in Patients Scheduled to Colonoscopy: Low-Residue Diet or Clear Liquid Diet? Evidence From Systematic Review With Power Analysis.结肠镜检查患者肠道准备方案:低渣饮食还是清流饮食?基于功效分析的系统评价证据
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jan;95(1):e2432. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002432.
5
Meta-analysis: The effect of patient education on bowel preparation for colonoscopy.荟萃分析:患者教育对结肠镜检查肠道准备的影响
Endosc Int Open. 2015 Dec;3(6):E646-52. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392365. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
6
Delivery of Instructions via Mobile Social Media App Increases Quality of Bowel Preparation.通过移动社交媒体应用程序提供说明可提高肠道准备质量。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Mar;14(3):429-435.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.09.038. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
7
The Effectiveness of Short Message Service to Assure the Preparation-to-Colonoscopy Interval before Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.短信服务对结肠镜检查前肠道准备期间保证准备时间的有效性。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:628049. doi: 10.1155/2015/628049. Epub 2015 Feb 22.
8
Improving the quality of colonoscopy bowel preparation using a smart phone application: a randomized trial.使用智能手机应用提高结肠镜肠道准备质量:一项随机试验。
Dig Endosc. 2015 Jul;27(5):590-5. doi: 10.1111/den.12467. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
9
Smartphones let surgeons know WhatsApp: an analysis of communication in emergency surgical teams.智能手机让外科医生用上WhatsApp:急诊外科团队中的沟通分析
Am J Surg. 2015 Jan;209(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.08.030. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
10
Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.优化结肠镜检查肠道准备的充分性:美国结直肠癌多学会特别工作组的建议
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct;109(10):1528-45. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.272. Epub 2014 Sep 16.