• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肠道准备创新技术指导(BPITIs)对结肠镜检查患者临床结局的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of bowel preparation innovative technology instructions (BPITIs) on clinical outcomes among patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Adult Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 4;13(1):10783. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37044-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-37044-w
PMID:37402823
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10319802/
Abstract

To evaluate the effectiveness of bowel preparation innovative technology instructions (BPITIs) among patients undergoing colonoscopy. We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster-RCTs from inception to February 28, 2022. The Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) tool and GRADE were used to assess RoB and certainty of evidence, respectively. Meta-analyses with random-effects model were used for analysis. This review included 47 RCTs (84 records). Seven BPITIs were found among included studies: (1) mobile apps, (2) VDO stream from personal devices, (3) VDO stream from a hospital device, (4) SMS re-education, (5) telephone re-education, (6) computer-based education, and (7) web-based education. The findings demonstrate that BPITIs have a slight impact on adherence to overall instructions (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.13-1.28; moderate-certainty evidence), adequate bowel preparation (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.07-1.13; low-certainty evidence), and quality of bowel preparation score (SMD 0.42, 95% CI 0.33-0.52; low-certainty evidence) compared to routine care. BPITIs may enhance the clinical outcomes. Due to the low-certainty evidence and heterogeneity of the included studies, the findings should be interpreted cautiously. Well-designed and reported RCTs are required to confirm the findings.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021217846.

摘要

评估创新的肠道准备技术指导(BPITIs)在结肠镜检查患者中的有效性。我们检索了 PubMed、MEDLINE、CINAHL、CENTRAL、Scopus、Web of Science、LILACS、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 Google Scholar,以获取从开始到 2022 年 2 月 28 日的随机对照试验(RCTs)和整群 RCTs。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险(RoB)工具和 GRADE 分别评估 RoB 和证据确定性。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。本综述包括 47 项 RCT(84 条记录)。纳入的研究中有 7 种 BPITIs:(1)移动应用程序,(2)个人设备的 VDO 流,(3)医院设备的 VDO 流,(4)短信再教育,(5)电话再教育,(6)基于计算机的教育和(7)基于网络的教育。研究结果表明,与常规护理相比,BPITIs 对总体指导的依从性(RR 1.20,95%CI 1.13-1.28;中等确定性证据)、充分的肠道准备(RR 1.10,95%CI 1.07-1.13;低确定性证据)和肠道准备质量评分(SMD 0.42,95%CI 0.33-0.52;低确定性证据)有轻微影响。BPITIs 可能会改善临床结局。由于纳入研究的低确定性证据和异质性,结果应谨慎解释。需要设计良好和报告良好的 RCT 来证实这些发现。PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42021217846。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dbf/10319802/d27d974c90a3/41598_2023_37044_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dbf/10319802/d269d62b2079/41598_2023_37044_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dbf/10319802/70f0e627014c/41598_2023_37044_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dbf/10319802/26e6ebd19e3d/41598_2023_37044_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dbf/10319802/fa42e9ccfab6/41598_2023_37044_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dbf/10319802/59c533f1350d/41598_2023_37044_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dbf/10319802/d27d974c90a3/41598_2023_37044_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dbf/10319802/d269d62b2079/41598_2023_37044_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dbf/10319802/70f0e627014c/41598_2023_37044_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dbf/10319802/26e6ebd19e3d/41598_2023_37044_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dbf/10319802/fa42e9ccfab6/41598_2023_37044_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dbf/10319802/59c533f1350d/41598_2023_37044_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dbf/10319802/d27d974c90a3/41598_2023_37044_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of bowel preparation innovative technology instructions (BPITIs) on clinical outcomes among patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肠道准备创新技术指导(BPITIs)对结肠镜检查患者临床结局的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 4;13(1):10783. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37044-w.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Mobile health technologies supporting colonoscopy preparation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.移动医疗技术在结肠镜检查准备中的应用:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 18;16(3):e0248679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248679. eCollection 2021.
4
Interventions for implementation of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients at risk for venous thromboembolism.对有静脉血栓栓塞风险的住院患者实施血栓预防的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 24;4(4):CD008201. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008201.pub3.
5
Comparative Effectiveness of Enhanced Patient Instructions for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: Network Meta-analysis of 23 Randomized Controlled Trials.增强版患者肠道准备指导在结肠镜检查前的应用效果比较:23 项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 25;23(10):e19915. doi: 10.2196/19915.
6
(Ultra-)long-acting insulin analogues for people with type 1 diabetes mellitus.(超)长效胰岛素类似物用于 1 型糖尿病患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 4;3(3):CD013498. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013498.pub2.
7
Impact of the diagnostic test Xpert MTB/RIF on patient outcomes for tuberculosis.诊断检测 Xpert MTB/RIF 对结核病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 6;5(5):CD012972. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012972.pub2.
8
Reinforced education by short message service improves the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.短信强化教育可提高结肠镜检查肠道准备质量。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Apr;37(4):815-822. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04114-w. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
9
Telephone instructions improve the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.电话指导可提高结肠镜检查的肠道准备质量:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 22;18(11):e0289063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289063. eCollection 2023.
10
Colonoscopy-guided therapy for the prevention of post-operative recurrence of Crohn's disease.结肠镜引导下治疗预防克罗恩病术后复发
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 3;8(8):CD012328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012328.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Bowel preparation assessment using artificial intelligence: Systematic review.使用人工智能进行肠道准备评估:系统评价
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Jul 1;13:a26256327. doi: 10.1055/a-2625-6327. eCollection 2025.
2
Online patient endoscopy education platform improves outpatient bowel preparation quality: Retrospective observational study.在线患者内镜检查教育平台可提高门诊肠道准备质量:回顾性观察研究。
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Nov 18;12(11):E1326-E1333. doi: 10.1055/a-2441-8166. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Promoting Research that Supports High-Quality Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Children.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of nurse-performed enhanced patient education on colonoscopy bowel preparation quality.护士实施强化患者教育对结肠镜肠道准备质量的影响。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2022;30:e3626. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.5597.3626.
2
Nurse-led reinforced education by mobile messenger improves the quality of bowel preparation of colonoscopy in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program: A randomized controlled trial.基于人群的结直肠癌筛查项目中,由护士主导的移动信息增强教育可提高结肠镜检查的肠道准备质量:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Sep;133:104301. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104301. Epub 2022 May 30.
3
Educating Outpatients for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy Using Conventional Methods vs Virtual Reality Videos Plus Conventional Methods: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
促进支持儿童高质量胃肠内镜检查的研究。
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2023 Nov;25(11):333-343. doi: 10.1007/s11894-023-00897-2. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
使用常规方法与虚拟现实视频联合常规方法对结肠镜检查前肠道准备进行门诊患者教育:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2135576. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.35576.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of Enhanced Patient Instructions for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: Network Meta-analysis of 23 Randomized Controlled Trials.增强版患者肠道准备指导在结肠镜检查前的应用效果比较:23 项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 25;23(10):e19915. doi: 10.2196/19915.
5
Mobile Health (mHealth) in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.低收入和中等收入国家的移动健康(mHealth)
Annu Rev Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;43:525-539. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052620-093850. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
6
Combination of Enhanced Instructions Improve Quality of Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Colonoscopist-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Study.增强指导联合方案提高肠道准备质量:一项前瞻性、盲法、随机、对照研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 Jan 1;65(1):117-124. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002070.
7
An Interactive Video Educational Tool Does Not Improve the Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Study.交互式视频教育工具不能提高结肠镜检查的肠道准备质量:一项随机对照研究。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Jun;67(6):2347-2357. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07215-8. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
8
Effects of a Personalized Smartphone App on Bowel Preparation Quality: Randomized Controlled Trial.个性化智能手机应用对肠道准备质量的影响:随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Aug 19;9(8):e26703. doi: 10.2196/26703.
9
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
10
Mobile health technologies supporting colonoscopy preparation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.移动医疗技术在结肠镜检查准备中的应用:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 18;16(3):e0248679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248679. eCollection 2021.