Victoria J. Bray, Liverpool Hospital; University of Sydney; Haryana M. Dhillon, Melanie L. Bell, and Michael Kabourakis, Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology, University of Sydney; Frances Boyle and Melanie A. Price, University of Sydney; Frances Boyle, Patricia Ritchie Centre for Cancer Care and Research; Janette L. Vardy, Concord Cancer Centre; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales; Desmond Yip, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia; and Melanie L. Bell and Mallorie H. Fiero, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 10;35(2):217-225. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.8201. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
Purpose Cognitive impairment is reported frequently by cancer survivors. There are no proven treatments. We evaluated a cognitive rehabilitation program (Insight) and compared it with standard care in cancer survivors self-reporting cognitive symptoms. Patients and Methods We recruited adult cancer survivors with a primary malignancy (excluding central nervous system malignancies) who had completed three or more cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy in the previous 6 to 60 months and reported persistent cognitive symptoms. All participants received a 30-minute telephone consultation and were then randomly assigned to the 15-week, home-based intervention or to standard care. Primary outcome was self-reported cognitive function (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Cognitive Function [FACT-COG] perceived cognitive impairment [PCI] subscale): difference between groups after intervention (T2) and 6 months later (T3). Results A total of 242 participants were randomly assigned: median age, 53 years; 95% female. The primary outcome of difference in FACT-COG PCI was significant, with less PCI in the intervention group at T2 ( P < .001). This difference was sustained at T3 ( P < .001). At T2, there was a significant difference in all FACT-COG subscales, favoring the intervention. Neuropsychological results were not significantly different between the groups at T2 or T3. There were significantly lower levels of anxiety/depression and fatigue in the intervention group at T2. There were significant improvements in stress in the intervention group at both time points. There was no significant difference in quality of life between the groups at T2, but the intervention group had better quality of life at T3. Conclusion The intervention, Insight, led to improvements in cognitive symptoms compared with standard care. To our knowledge, this is the first large randomized controlled trial showing an improvement in self-reported cognitive function in cancer survivors, indicating that this intervention is a feasible treatment.
癌症幸存者常报告认知障碍,但目前尚无经证实的治疗方法。我们评估了一种认知康复方案(Insight),并将其与报告有认知症状的癌症幸存者的标准护理进行了比较。
我们招募了患有原发性恶性肿瘤(不包括中枢神经系统恶性肿瘤)、在过去 6 至 60 个月内完成了 3 个或更多周期辅助化疗且报告持续存在认知症状的成年癌症幸存者。所有参与者均接受了 30 分钟的电话咨询,然后随机分配至 15 周的家庭干预组或标准护理组。主要结局为自我报告的认知功能(癌症治疗功能评估认知功能量表[FACT-COG]感知认知障碍[PCI]子量表):干预后(T2)和 6 个月后(T3)两组间的差异。
共 242 名参与者被随机分配:中位年龄为 53 岁,95%为女性。FACT-COG PCI 的主要结局差异有统计学意义,干预组 T2 时 PCI 较低(P<0.001),T3 时仍如此(P<0.001)。T2 时,所有 FACT-COG 子量表均有显著差异,干预组更优。T2 和 T3 时两组间的神经心理学结果无显著差异。T2 时,干预组的焦虑/抑郁和疲劳水平显著较低。T2 和 T3 时,干预组的压力均有显著改善。T2 时两组间的生活质量无显著差异,但 T3 时干预组的生活质量更好。
与标准护理相比,干预方案 Insight 可改善认知症状。据我们所知,这是第一项显示癌症幸存者自我报告的认知功能得到改善的大型随机对照试验,表明该干预措施是一种可行的治疗方法。