Bundhun Pravesh Kumar, Teeluck Abhishek Rishikesh, Bhurtu Akash, Huang Wei-Qiang
Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, People's Republic of China.
Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530027, People's Republic of China.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Jan 5;17(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0453-6.
Controversies were previously observed with the concomitant use of clopidogrel and Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs), especially omeprazole, following coronary angioplasty. Even though several studies showed no interaction between clopidogrel and PPIs, questions have been raised about the decrease in antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel with PPIs. A previously published meta-analysis showed concomitant use of clopidogrel and PPIs to be associated with higher adverse cardiovascular outcomes. However, data which were used were extracted from studies published before the year 2012. Whether these controversies still exist in this new era is not clear. Therefore, we aim to show if the concomitant use of clopidogrel and PPIs is still associated with higher adverse outcomes following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) using data obtained from recently published studies (2012 to 2016).
Electronic databases were searched for recent publications (2012-2016) comparing (clopidogrel plus PPIs) versus clopidogrel alone following PCI. Adverse cardiovascular outcomes were considered as the clinical endpoints. Odds Ratios (OR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were used as the statistical parameters and the pooled analyses were performed with RevMan 5.3 software.
Eleven studies with a total number of 84,729 patients (29,235 patients from the PPIs group versus 55,494 patients from the non-PPIs group) were included. Results of this analysis showed that short term mortality and Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) significantly favored the non-PPIs group with OR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.43-1.68, P < 0.00001 and OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.06-1.49, P = 0.009 respectively. Long-term Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACEs), Myocardial Infarction (MI), Stent Thrombosis (ST) and TVR significantly favored patients who did not use PPIs with OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.23-1.53, P < 0.00001, OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.26-1.57, P < 0.00001 and OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.13-1.70, P = 0.002 and OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.01-1.61, P = 0.04 respectively. However, the result for long term mortality was not statistically significant.
The combined use of clopidogrel with PPIs is still associated with significantly higher adverse cardiovascular events such as MACEs, ST and MI following PCI supporting results of the previously published meta-analysis. However, long-term mortality is not statistically significant warranting further analysis with randomized patients.
先前观察到冠状动脉血管成形术后联合使用氯吡格雷和质子泵抑制剂(PPI),尤其是奥美拉唑时存在争议。尽管多项研究表明氯吡格雷与PPI之间无相互作用,但有人对PPI降低氯吡格雷的抗血小板作用提出了质疑。先前发表的一项荟萃分析表明,氯吡格雷与PPI联合使用与更高的不良心血管结局相关。然而,所使用的数据是从2012年以前发表的研究中提取的。在这个新时代这些争议是否仍然存在尚不清楚。因此,我们旨在利用最近发表的研究(2012年至2016年)获得的数据,来表明经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后氯吡格雷与PPI联合使用是否仍与更高的不良结局相关。
检索电子数据库以查找近期(2012 - 2016年)比较PCI后(氯吡格雷加PPI)与单用氯吡格雷的出版物。不良心血管结局被视为临床终点。使用比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)作为统计参数,并使用RevMan 5.3软件进行汇总分析。
纳入了11项研究,共84729例患者(PPI组29235例患者,非PPI组55494例患者)。该分析结果表明,短期死亡率和靶血管血运重建(TVR)显著有利于非PPI组,OR分别为:1.55;95% CI:1.43 - 1.68,P < 0.00001和OR:1.26;95% CI:1.06 - 1.49,P = 0.009。长期主要不良心脏事件(MACE)、心肌梗死(MI)、支架血栓形成(ST)和TVR显著有利于未使用PPI的患者,OR分别为:1.37;95% CI:1.23 - 1.53,P < 0.00001,OR:1.41;95% CI:1.26 - 1.57,P < 0.00001,OR:1.38;95% CI:1.13 - 1.70,P = 0.002和OR:1.28;95% CI:1.01 - 1.61,P = 0.04。然而,长期死亡率的结果无统计学意义。
氯吡格雷与PPI联合使用仍与PCI后显著更高的不良心血管事件如MACE、ST和MI相关,支持先前发表的荟萃分析结果。然而,长期死亡率无统计学意义,需要对随机分组患者进行进一步分析。