• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动脉瓣狭窄的医疗质量评估与改善——多中心注册研究(IMPULSE)的原理与设计

Quality of care assessment and improvement in aortic stenosis - rationale and design of a multicentre registry (IMPULSE).

作者信息

Frey Norbert, Steeds Richard P, Serra Antonio, Schulz Eberhard, Baldus Stephan, Lutz Matthias, Pohlmann Christiane, Kurucova Jana, Bramlage Peter, Messika-Zeitoun David

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Queen Elizabeth Hospital and Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Jan 5;17(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0439-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12872-016-0439-4
PMID:28056819
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5217261/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Severe aortic stenosis (AS) is a common, serious valve disease in which no effective medical therapy is available and, if not treated by intervention, has a 5-year survival of only 40-60%. Despite the availability of guidelines supporting the effective use of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to treat the majority of these patients, adherence to these guidelines in clinical practice is still unsatisfactory. Several recent studies have emphasised the necessity for improved communication between multidisciplinary teams, with the aim to ensure that severe AS patients receive appropriate treatment.

METHODS/DESIGN: IMPULSE is a prospective, multicentre, European registry designed to gather data over 12 months on the treatment decisions made by referring physicians for patients newly diagnosed with severe AS. Each patient has a follow-up of 3 months. The study will consist of two observational phases to assess the appropriateness and rate of referral based on current guidelines prior to and after an interventional phase aiming to determine whether a simple quality of care intervention improves patient management.

DISCUSSION

Data will be analysed firstly, to determine the appropriateness of treatment decisions for the management of severe AS in current European clinical practice, and secondly, to evaluate the effectiveness of facilitated data relay from a designated echocardiography department nurse to the referring physician early after diagnosis in improving quality of care. Additionally, variables will be identified that are associated with inappropriate decision-making. Collectively, the aim will be to design a clinical pathway that will improve the timely management of patients with newly diagnosed severe AS.

摘要

背景

重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)是一种常见且严重的瓣膜疾病,目前尚无有效的药物治疗方法,若不进行干预治疗,5年生存率仅为40% - 60%。尽管有指南支持有效使用外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)或经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)来治疗大多数此类患者,但临床实践中对这些指南的遵循情况仍不尽人意。最近的几项研究强调了多学科团队之间加强沟通的必要性,目的是确保重度AS患者得到适当治疗。

方法/设计:IMPULSE是一项前瞻性、多中心的欧洲注册研究,旨在收集转诊医生对新诊断为重度AS患者的治疗决策数据,为期12个月。每位患者随访3个月。该研究将包括两个观察阶段,以评估在一个旨在确定简单的护理质量干预措施是否能改善患者管理的干预阶段之前和之后,基于当前指南的转诊适宜性和转诊率。

讨论

首先将对数据进行分析,以确定当前欧洲临床实践中重度AS管理治疗决策的适宜性,其次评估在诊断后早期由指定的超声心动图科室护士向转诊医生进行便利的数据传递对改善护理质量的有效性。此外,还将确定与不适当决策相关的变量。总体目标是设计一条临床路径,以改善新诊断的重度AS患者的及时管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d865/5217261/c8021c185943/12872_2016_439_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d865/5217261/c8021c185943/12872_2016_439_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d865/5217261/c8021c185943/12872_2016_439_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality of care assessment and improvement in aortic stenosis - rationale and design of a multicentre registry (IMPULSE).主动脉瓣狭窄的医疗质量评估与改善——多中心注册研究(IMPULSE)的原理与设计
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Jan 5;17(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0439-4.
2
Appropriateness of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insight From the OCEAN-TAVI Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的适宜性:来自OCEAN-TAVI注册研究的见解
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Apr;13(4):e006146. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006146. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
3
Facilitated Data Relay and Effects on Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis in Europe.在欧洲,数据中继的便利性及其对严重主动脉瓣狭窄治疗的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Oct;8(19):e013160. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013160. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
4
The impact of the development of transcatheter aortic valve implantation on the management of severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients: treatment strategies and outcome.经导管主动脉瓣植入术的发展对高危患者严重主动脉瓣狭窄管理的影响:治疗策略与结果
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Jan;51(1):80-88. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw211. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
5
Optimal Implantation Depth and Adherence to Guidelines on Permanent Pacing to Improve the Results of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With the Medtronic CoreValve System: The CoreValve Prospective, International, Post-Market ADVANCE-II Study.优化植入深度并遵循永久性起搏指南以改善美敦力 CoreValve 系统经导管主动脉瓣置换术的结果:CoreValve 前瞻性、国际、上市后 ADVANCE-II 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 May;8(6):837-846. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.02.005.
6
Regional Systems of Care to Optimize Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.区域化医疗系统可优化行经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的预后。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 28;8(15):1944-1951. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.09.017.
7
Balloon expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation via the transfemoral route with or without pre-dilation of the aortic valve - rationale and design of a multicentre registry (EASE-IT TF).经股动脉途径进行球囊扩张式经导管主动脉瓣植入术,主动脉瓣有无预扩张——多中心注册研究(EASE-IT TF)的原理与设计
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Nov 15;16(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0390-4.
8
Clinical Outcome of Patients with Aortic Stenosis and Coronary Artery Disease Not Treated According to Current Recommendations.未按照当前推荐方案治疗的主动脉瓣狭窄合并冠状动脉疾病患者的临床结局
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2016 Apr;9(2):145-52. doi: 10.1007/s12265-016-9680-6. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
9
[Commentary by the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery on the positions statement by the German Cardiology Society on quality criteria for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)].[德国胸心血管外科学会对德国心脏病学会关于经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)质量标准立场声明的评论]
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Dec;62(8):639-44. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1395972. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
10
European Society of Cardiology Council for Cardiology Practice worldwide survey of transcatheter aortic valve implantation beliefs and practices.欧洲心脏病学会全球经导管主动脉瓣植入术信念和实践理事会调查。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018 Apr;25(6):608-617. doi: 10.1177/2047487318760029. Epub 2018 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Bedside Physical Examination for the Diagnosis of Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.用于诊断主动脉瓣狭窄的床旁体格检查:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
CJC Open. 2023 Feb 27;5(5):373-379. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.02.007. eCollection 2023 May.
2
Setting a benchmark for resource utilization and quality of care in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Europe-Rationale and design of the international BENCHMARK registry.在欧洲经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者中设定资源利用和护理质量的基准——国际 BENCHMARK 注册研究的原理和设计。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Oct;44(10):1344-1353. doi: 10.1002/clc.23711. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Guideline Adherence for Echocardiographic Follow-Up in Outpatients with at Least Moderate Valvular Disease.至少患有中度瓣膜病的门诊患者行超声心动图随访的指南依从性。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Jul;28(7):795-801. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
2
2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jun 10;63(22):e57-185. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.536. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
3
Management of patients with severe aortic stenosis in the TAVI-era: how recent recommendations are translated into clinical practice.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术时代严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的管理:最新建议如何转化为临床实践。
Open Heart. 2021 Jan;8(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001485.
4
IMPULSE: the impact of gender on the presentation and management of aortic stenosis across Europe.IMPULSE:欧洲范围内性别对主动脉瓣狭窄的临床表现和治疗管理的影响。
Open Heart. 2021 Jan;8(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001443.
5
Better survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement by process improvements.通过流程改进提高经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的生存率。
Neth Heart J. 2021 Apr;29(4):193-200. doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01526-7. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
6
Differences in the presentation and management of patients with severe aortic stenosis in different European centres.欧洲不同中心重症主动脉瓣狭窄患者在临床表现及治疗方面的差异。
Open Heart. 2020 Sep;7(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001345.
7
Impact of selected comorbidities on the presentation and management of aortic stenosis.特定合并症对主动脉瓣狭窄的表现及治疗的影响。
Open Heart. 2020 Jul;7(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001271.
8
Facilitated Data Relay and Effects on Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis in Europe.在欧洲,数据中继的便利性及其对严重主动脉瓣狭窄治疗的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Oct;8(19):e013160. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013160. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
9
Aortic valve stenosis awareness in Austria-results of a nationwide survey in 1001 subjects.奥地利主动脉瓣狭窄认知情况——一项针对1001名受试者的全国性调查结果
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2020 Apr;170(5-6):141-149. doi: 10.1007/s10354-019-00708-2. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
10
Patient screening for early detection of aortic stenosis (AS)-review of current practice and future perspectives.用于早期检测主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)的患者筛查——当前实践与未来展望综述
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Sep;10(9):5584-5594. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.09.02.
Aortic stenosis in the elderly: disease prevalence and number of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis and modeling study.
老年人主动脉瓣狭窄:经导管主动脉瓣置换术候选人群的疾病患病率:一项荟萃分析和建模研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Sep 10;62(11):1002-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 May 30.
4
Specialist valve clinics: recommendations from the British Heart Valve Society working group on improving quality in the delivery of care for patients with heart valve disease.专科瓣膜诊所:英国心脏瓣膜协会改善心脏瓣膜病患者护理质量工作组的建议
Heart. 2013 Dec;99(23):1714-6. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-303754. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
5
ESC Working Group on Valvular Heart Disease position paper--heart valve clinics: organization, structure, and experiences.ESC 工作组关于瓣膜性心脏病立场文件——心脏瓣膜诊所:组织、结构和经验。
Eur Heart J. 2013 Jun;34(21):1597-606. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs443. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
6
The evolving epidemiology of valvular aortic stenosis. the Tromsø study.主动脉瓣狭窄的不断演变的流行病学。特罗姆瑟研究。
Heart. 2013 Mar;99(6):396-400. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302265. Epub 2012 Sep 2.
7
Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): the Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).《心脏瓣膜病管理指南(2012年版)》:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)心脏瓣膜病管理联合工作组
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Oct;42(4):S1-44. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs455. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
8
ESC Working Group on Valvular Heart Disease Position Paper: assessing the risk of interventions in patients with valvular heart disease.ESC 工作组关于瓣膜性心脏病的立场文件:评估瓣膜性心脏病患者介入治疗的风险。
Eur Heart J. 2012 Apr;33(7):822-8, 828a, 828b. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr061. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
9
Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗不能手术的主动脉瓣狭窄患者。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 21;363(17):1597-607. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1008232. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
10
Echocardiography in aortic diseases: EAE recommendations for clinical practice.主动脉疾病的超声心动图检查:欧洲心脏病学会临床实践建议
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010 Sep;11(8):645-58. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jeq056.