Nandi Pinki, Girish Gannareddy V, Majumder Mousumi, Xin Xiping, Tutunea-Fatan Elena, Lala Peeyush K
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A5C1, Canada.
Department of Biology, Brandon University, Brandon, Manitoba, R7A 6A9, Canada.
BMC Cancer. 2017 Jan 5;17(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-3018-2.
Lymphatic metastasis, facilitated by lymphangiogenesis is a common occurrence in breast cancer, the molecular mechanisms remaining incompletely understood. We had earlier shown that cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 expression by human or murine breast cancer cells promoted lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis by upregulating VEGF-C/D production by tumor cells or tumor-associated macrophages primarily due to activation of the prostaglandin receptor EP4 by endogenous PGE2. It is not clear whether tumor or host-derived PGE2 has any direct effect on lymphangiogenesis, and if so, whether EP4 receptors on lymphatic endothelial cells (LEC) play any role.
Here, we address these questions employing in vitro studies with a COX-2-expressing and VEGF-C/D-producing murine breast cancer cell line C3L5 and a rat mesenteric (RM) LEC line and in vivo studies in nude mice.
RMLEC responded to PGE2, an EP4 agonist PGE1OH, or C3L5 cell-conditioned media (C3L5-CM) by increased proliferation, migration and accelerated tube formation on growth factor reduced Matrigel. Native tube formation by RMLEC on Matrigel was abrogated in the presence of a selective COX-2 inhibitor or an EP4 antagonist. Addition of PGE2 or EP4 agonist, or C3L5-CM individually in the presence of COX-2 inhibitor, or EP4 antagonist, restored tube formation, reinforcing the role of EP4 on RMLEC in tubulogenesis. These results were partially duplicated with a human dermal LEC (HMVEC-dLyAd) and a COX-2 expressing human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231. Knocking down EP4 with shRNA in RMLEC abrogated their tube forming capacity on Matrigel in the absence or presence of PGE2, EP4 agonist, or C3L5-CM. RMLEC tubulogenesis following EP4 activation by agonist treatment was dependent on PI3K/Akt and Erk signaling pathways and VEGFR-3 stimulation. Finally in a directed in vivo lymphangiogenesis assay (DIVLA) we demonstrated the lymphangiogenic as well as angiogenic capacity of PGE2 and EP4 agonist in vivo.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the roles of tumor as well as host-derived PGE2 in inducing lymphangiogenesis, at least in part, by activating EP4 and VEGFR-3 on LEC. EP4 being a common target on both tumor and host cells contributing to tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis reaffirms the therapeutic value of EP4 antagonists in the intervention of lymphatic metastasis in breast cancer.
在乳腺癌中,淋巴管生成促进的淋巴转移很常见,但其分子机制仍未完全明确。我们之前已经表明,人或鼠乳腺癌细胞表达的环氧化酶(COX)-2通过上调肿瘤细胞或肿瘤相关巨噬细胞产生的VEGF-C/D来促进淋巴管生成和淋巴转移,这主要是由于内源性PGE2激活了前列腺素受体EP4。目前尚不清楚肿瘤来源或宿主来源的PGE2是否对淋巴管生成有直接影响,如果有影响,淋巴管内皮细胞(LEC)上的EP4受体是否发挥作用。
在这里,我们使用表达COX-2并产生VEGF-C/D的鼠乳腺癌细胞系C3L5和大鼠肠系膜(RM)LEC系进行体外研究,并在裸鼠中进行体内研究来解决这些问题。
RMLEC对PGE2、EP4激动剂PGE1OH或C3L5细胞条件培养基(C3L5-CM)有反应,表现为在生长因子减少的基质胶上增殖增加、迁移加快和管形成加速。在存在选择性COX-2抑制剂或EP4拮抗剂的情况下,RMLEC在基质胶上的天然管形成被消除。在存在COX-2抑制剂或EP4拮抗剂的情况下分别添加PGE2或EP4激动剂或C3L5-CM,可恢复管形成,这加强了EP4在RMLEC管生成中的作用。这些结果在人真皮LEC(HMVEC-dLyAd)和表达COX-2的人乳腺癌细胞系MDA-MB-231中部分重复。在RMLEC中用shRNA敲低EP4可消除其在有无PGE2、EP4激动剂或C3L5-CM的情况下在基质胶上的管形成能力。激动剂处理激活EP4后RMLEC的管生成依赖于PI3K/Akt和Erk信号通路以及VEGFR-3刺激。最后,在直接体内淋巴管生成试验(DIVLA)中,我们证明了PGE2和EP4激动剂在体内的淋巴管生成和血管生成能力。
讨论/结论:这些结果表明,肿瘤来源和宿主来源的PGE2至少部分通过激活LEC上的EP4和VEGFR-3在诱导淋巴管生成中发挥作用。EP4作为肿瘤和宿主细胞上共同的靶点,有助于肿瘤相关淋巴管生成,这再次肯定了EP4拮抗剂在干预乳腺癌淋巴转移中的治疗价值。