Huang Yu, Jia Bo, Jiang Shiyu, Zhou Shengyu, Yang Jianliang, Liu Peng, Gui Lin, He Xiaohui, Qin Yan, Sun Yan, Shi Yuankai
Department of Medical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
J Hematol Oncol. 2017 Jan 5;10(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13045-016-0368-9.
The difference in clinical features and treatment outcomes between localized sinonasal diffuse large B cell lymphoma (SN-DLBCL) and sinonasal extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma (SN-ENKTL) is unclear. Therefore, we analyzed a total of 47 patients with localized SN-DLBCL and 211 patients with localized SN-ENKTL. The age distribution for these two subtypes is very distinct and the B symptoms were more common in SN-ENKTL. However, both SN-DLBCL and SN-ENKTL patients could achieve high overall response rate (ORR) and favorable prognoses. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates for patients with SN-DLBCL and SN-ENKTL were 79.7 and 83.6% (p = 0.707), and the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 61.4 and 70.1% (p = 0.294), respectively. For SN-DLBCL patients, chemotherapy followed by involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) resulted in higher OS (83.7 vs 62.5%) and PFS (63.9 vs 50.0%) compared with chemotherapy alone, but the difference was not significant. No significant difference was found in the OS or PFS between radiotherapy alone and radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy for all patients with SN-ENKTL. But in extensive stage I and stage II SN-ENKTL patients, radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy could significantly improve the PFS (73.8 vs 50.0%) compared with radiotherapy alone. These results indicate that remarkable clinical disparities exist between localized SN-DLBCL and SN-ENKTL. However, different treatment strategies for them can result in similarly favorable prognoses.
局限性鼻窦弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(SN-DLBCL)和鼻窦结外NK/T细胞淋巴瘤(SN-ENKTL)在临床特征和治疗结果上的差异尚不清楚。因此,我们分析了总共47例局限性SN-DLBCL患者和211例局限性SN-ENKTL患者。这两种亚型的年龄分布非常不同,B症状在SN-ENKTL中更常见。然而,SN-DLBCL和SN-ENKTL患者均可获得较高的总缓解率(ORR)和良好的预后。SN-DLBCL和SN-ENKTL患者的3年总生存率(OS)分别为79.7%和83.6%(p = 0.707),3年无进展生存率(PFS)分别为61.4%和70.1%(p = 0.294)。对于SN-DLBCL患者,与单纯化疗相比,化疗后行受累野放疗(IFRT)可提高OS(83.7%对62.5%)和PFS(63.9%对50.0%),但差异不显著。对于所有SN-ENKTL患者,单纯放疗与放疗联合化疗在OS或PFS方面均未发现显著差异。但在广泛期I和II期SN-ENKTL患者中,与单纯放疗相比,放疗联合化疗可显著提高PFS(73.8%对50.0%)。这些结果表明,局限性SN-DLBCL和SN-ENKTL之间存在明显的临床差异。然而,针对它们的不同治疗策略可导致相似的良好预后。