Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes of Quantum and Radiation Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.
Center for Frontier Medical Engineering, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 5;7(1):e013925. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013925.
To compare shear-wave speed (SWS) measured by ultrasound-based point shear-wave elastography (pSWE) and MR elastography (MRE) on phantoms with a known shear modulus, and to assess method validity and variability.
5 homogeneous phantoms of different stiffnesses were made. Shear modulus was measured by a rheometer, and this value was used as the standard. 10 SWS measurements were obtained at 4 different depths with 1.0-4.5 MHz convex (4C1) and 4.0-9.0 MHz linear (9L4) transducers using pSWE. MRE was carried out once per phantom, and SWSs at 5 different depths were obtained. These SWSs were then compared with those from a rheometer using linear regression analyses.
SWSs obtained with both pSWE as well as MRE had a strong correlation with those obtained by a rheometer (R>0.97). The relative difference in SWS between the procedures was from -25.2% to 25.6% for all phantoms, and from -8.1% to 6.9% when the softest and hardest phantoms were excluded. Depth dependency was noted in the 9L4 transducer of pSWE and MRE.
SWSs from pSWE and MRE showed a good correlation with a rheometer-determined SWS. Although based on phantom studies, SWSs obtained with these methods are not always equivalent, the measurement can be thought of as reliable and these SWSs were reasonably close to each other for the middle range of stiffness within the measurable range.
比较基于超声的单点剪切波弹性成像(pSWE)和磁共振弹性成像(MRE)在具有已知剪切模量的体模上测量的剪切波速度(SWS),并评估方法的有效性和可变性。
制作了 5 个不同刚度的均匀体模。使用流变仪测量剪切模量,该值用作标准。使用 1.0-4.5 MHz 凸阵(4C1)和 4.0-9.0 MHz 线阵(9L4)探头的 pSWE 在 4 个不同深度进行了 10 次 SWS 测量。对每个体模进行一次 MRE,并获得 5 个不同深度的 SWS。然后使用线性回归分析将这些 SWS 与流变仪的 SWS 进行比较。
pSWE 和 MRE 获得的 SWS 与流变仪获得的 SWS 具有很强的相关性(R>0.97)。对于所有体模,SWS 的相对差值在两种方法之间为-25.2%至 25.6%,当排除最软和最硬的体模时,差值为-8.1%至 6.9%。在 pSWE 和 MRE 的 9L4 换能器中观察到深度依赖性。
pSWE 和 MRE 的 SWS 与流变仪确定的 SWS 具有良好的相关性。尽管基于体模研究,但这两种方法获得的 SWS 并不总是等效的,但可以认为该测量是可靠的,并且在可测量的刚度范围内的中间范围内,这些 SWS 彼此之间非常接近。