• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与日本食管癌切除术后十年生存率相关的参数。日本食管癌病例登记委员会。

Parameters linked to ten-year survival in Japan of resected esophageal carcinoma. Japanese Committee for Registration of Esophageal Carcinoma Cases.

作者信息

Iizuka T, Isono K, Kakegawa T, Watanabe H

机构信息

National Ooji Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Chest. 1989 Nov;96(5):1005-11. doi: 10.1378/chest.96.5.1005.

DOI:10.1378/chest.96.5.1005
PMID:2805827
Abstract

From January 1969 to December 1980, 8,948 patients with esophageal carcinoma were registered in Japan. Among these patients, 5,506 underwent resection. The ten-year survival rate was 12.3 percent for all registered patients and 18.7 percent for resected cases. Female patients had significantly better survival rates than male patients. Depth of invasion correlated better with ten-year survival than the superficial extent of the tumor. The TNM classification revised in 1987 was examined in relation to the survival, and it was found to have good prognostic value.

摘要

1969年1月至1980年12月期间,日本登记了8948例食管癌患者。在这些患者中,5506例接受了手术切除。所有登记患者的十年生存率为12.3%,手术切除病例的十年生存率为18.7%。女性患者的生存率明显高于男性患者。肿瘤浸润深度与十年生存率的相关性比肿瘤的表面范围更好。对1987年修订的TNM分类与生存率的关系进行了研究,发现其具有良好的预后价值。

相似文献

1
Parameters linked to ten-year survival in Japan of resected esophageal carcinoma. Japanese Committee for Registration of Esophageal Carcinoma Cases.与日本食管癌切除术后十年生存率相关的参数。日本食管癌病例登记委员会。
Chest. 1989 Nov;96(5):1005-11. doi: 10.1378/chest.96.5.1005.
2
Evaluation of the 7th edition of the TNM classification in patients with resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.对接受手术切除的食管鳞状细胞癌患者进行第7版TNM分类评估。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 28;20(48):18397-403. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i48.18397.
3
Ten-year survival after esophagectomy for carcinoma. Surgical triumph or biologic variation?
Chest. 1989 Nov;96(5):970-1. doi: 10.1378/chest.96.5.970.
4
Primary mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the esophagus.食管原发性黏液表皮样癌。
J Thorac Oncol. 2011 Aug;6(8):1426-31. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31821cfb96.
5
Comparison of the long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection for superficial squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus in Japan.日本内镜下切除食管浅表鳞癌和腺癌的长期疗效比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar;109(3):348-56. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.450. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
6
First-line chemotherapy improves the resection rate and long-term survival of locally advanced (T4, any N, M0) squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: final report on 163 consecutive patients with 5-year follow-up.一线化疗可提高局部晚期(T4,任何N,M0)胸段食管鳞状细胞癌的切除率和长期生存率:163例连续患者5年随访的最终报告
Ann Surg. 1997 Dec;226(6):714-23; discussion 723-4. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199712000-00008.
7
Treatment of superficial cancer of the esophagus: a summary of responses to a questionnaire on superficial cancer of the esophagus in Japan.食管表浅癌的治疗:日本食管表浅癌问卷调查结果总结
Surgery. 1998 Apr;123(4):432-9.
8
[Survival and prognostic evaluation of superficial esophageal cancer after surgery].[食管表浅癌术后的生存及预后评估]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Feb;96(6):460-3. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.06.011.
9
Prognostic factors and outcome for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma underwent surgical resection alone: evaluation of the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.单纯手术切除治疗食管鳞癌患者的预后因素和结局:美国癌症联合委员会第 7 版食管鳞癌分期系统评估。
J Thorac Oncol. 2013 Apr;8(4):495-501. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182829e2c.
10
Results of esophagectomy and gastric bypass for cancer of the esophagus.食管癌的食管切除术和胃转流术的结果。
Hepatogastroenterology. 1989 Dec;36(6):522-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic impact of tumor length in esophageal Cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.食管癌肿瘤长度的预后影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Sep 3;21(1):988. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08728-1.
2
Esophageal luminal stenosis is an independent prognostic factor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.食管腔狭窄是食管鳞状细胞癌的一个独立预后因素。
Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 27;8(26):43397-43405. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14762.
3
The outcomes of radiotherapy and factors that predict overall survival in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
老年食管鳞状细胞癌患者的放疗结局及预测总生存的因素
Clin Transl Oncol. 2017 Jun;19(6):742-749. doi: 10.1007/s12094-016-1603-0. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
4
Prognostic factors in patients after definitive chemoradiation using involved-field radiotherapy for esophageal cancer in a phase II study.在 II 期研究中,使用累及野放疗对食管癌进行根治性放化疗后的患者的预后因素。
Thorac Cancer. 2016 Sep;7(5):564-569. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12369. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
5
Does tumor size improve the accuracy of prognostic prediction in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after surgical resection?肿瘤大小能否提高食管鳞状细胞癌患者手术切除后预后预测的准确性?
Oncotarget. 2016 Oct 11;7(41):66623-66634. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11286.
6
Clinicopathological significance of Fas and Fas ligand expressions in esophageal cancer.食管癌中 Fas 和 Fas 配体表达的临床病理意义。
Am J Cancer Res. 2015 Aug 15;5(9):2865-71. eCollection 2015.
7
Accuracy of preoperative diagnosis of lymph node metastasis for thoracic esophageal cancer patients from JCOG9907 trial.JCOG9907试验中胸段食管癌患者术前淋巴结转移诊断的准确性
Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr;21(2):283-288. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0899-z. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
8
The characteristics of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: an analysis of 1317 cases in southeastern China.食管鳞状细胞癌的特征:中国东南部1317例病例分析
Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2015;19(2):137-41. doi: 10.5114/wo.2015.51419. Epub 2015 May 13.
9
Tumor length in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: is it a prognostic factor?老年食管鳞癌患者的肿瘤长度:是预后因素吗?
Ups J Med Sci. 2013 Aug;118(3):145-52. doi: 10.3109/03009734.2013.792887. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
10
Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors for patients with esophageal cancer following radiotherapy.食管癌患者放疗后的长期预后及影响因素分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar 14;19(10):1639-44. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i10.1639.