• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)4类亚组的乳腺钼靶检查结果患者的临床病理表现比较。

Comparison of clinicopathological findings among patients whose mammography results were classified as category 4 subgroups of the BI-RADS.

作者信息

Leblebici Ihsan Metin, Bozkurt Suleyman, Eren Turgut Tunc, Ozemir Ibrahim Ali, Sagiroglu Julide, Alimoglu Orhan

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Goztepe Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of General Surgery, Bezmialem Vakif University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

North Clin Istanb. 2014 Aug 3;1(1):1-5. doi: 10.14744/nci.2014.21931. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.14744/nci.2014.21931
PMID:28058294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5175017/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our aim is to compare mammographic, demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of patients whose mammographies were classified as subgroups of BI-RADS 4 category (Breast Imaging - Reporting and Data System).

METHODS

In total, 103 patients with mammography (Senographe 600t Senix HF; General Electric, Moulineaux, France) results classified as BI-RADS 4 were included in the study. Demographic data (age, menopause, and family history) were recorded. All data were compared among BI-RADS 4 subgroups.

RESULTS

In all, 68.9% (71/103), 7.8% (8/103) and 23.3% (24/103) the patients were in groups BI-RADS 4A, 4B and 4C, respectively. The incidence of malignancy was higher in Groups 4B and 4C than in Group 4A (p<0.05), but similar in Groups 4B and 4C (p>0.05). Mean age was lower in Group 4B than in Groups 4A and 4C (p<0.05). A positive family history was more common in Group 4A than in Group 4B (p=0.025). The frequency of menopausal patients was greater in Groups 4A and 4C than in Group 4B (p=0.021, and 0.003, respectively).

METHODS

The rate of malignancy was higher in Groups 4B, and 4C than in Group 4A. A positive family history was more common in Group 4A than in Group 4C. Groups 4A, and 4C patients tended to be older and were more likely to be menopausal than Group 4B patients.

摘要

目的

我们的目的是比较乳房X线摄影检查结果被归类为乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)4类亚组的患者的乳房X线摄影、人口统计学和临床病理特征。

方法

本研究共纳入103例乳房X线摄影检查(使用Senix HF型600t Senographe;通用电气公司,法国穆利诺)结果被归类为BI-RADS 4的患者。记录人口统计学数据(年龄、绝经情况和家族史)。对BI-RADS 4各亚组的所有数据进行比较。

结果

总体而言,分别有68.9%(71/103)、7.8%(8/103)和23.3%(24/103)的患者属于BI-RADS 4A、4B和4C组。4B组和4C组的恶性肿瘤发生率高于4A组(p<0.05),但4B组和4C组相似(p>0.05)。4B组的平均年龄低于4A组和4C组(p<0.05)。4A组的阳性家族史比4B组更常见(p=0.025)。4A组和4C组绝经患者的频率高于4B组(分别为p=0.021和0.003)。

方法

4B组和4C组的恶性肿瘤发生率高于4A组。4A组的阳性家族史比4C组更常见。4A组和4C组的患者往往年龄较大,且比4B组患者更易绝经。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a8/5175017/e568131f02c9/NCI-1-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a8/5175017/e568131f02c9/NCI-1-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a8/5175017/e568131f02c9/NCI-1-1-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of clinicopathological findings among patients whose mammography results were classified as category 4 subgroups of the BI-RADS.乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)4类亚组的乳腺钼靶检查结果患者的临床病理表现比较。
North Clin Istanb. 2014 Aug 3;1(1):1-5. doi: 10.14744/nci.2014.21931. eCollection 2014.
2
The Positive Predictive Values of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 Lesions and its Mammographic Morphological Features.乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)4类病变的阳性预测值及其乳腺X线摄影形态学特征
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021 Mar;12(1):182-189. doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01274-5. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
3
Prediction for Breast Cancer in BI-RADS Category 4 Lesion Categorized by Age and Breast Composition of Women in Songklanagarind Hospital.BI-RADS 4 类乳腺病变中年龄和乳腺组成对女性乳腺癌预测的研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Feb 1;22(2):531-536. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.2.531.
4
Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficiency of Categories 4 and 5 of the Second Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Diagnosing Breast Lesions.乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)超声术语词典第二版4类和5类在诊断乳腺病变中的诊断准确性和效率评估
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016 Sep;42(9):2065-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.04.020. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
5
Mammography breast density: an effective supplemental modality for the precise grading of ultrasound BI-RADS 4 categories.乳腺钼靶密度:超声BI-RADS 4类精确分级的有效辅助手段。
Gland Surg. 2021 Jun;10(6):2010-2018. doi: 10.21037/gs-21-313.
6
Subcategorization of Ultrasonographic BI-RADS Category 4: Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy in Diagnosing Breast Lesions and Influence of Clinical Factors on Positive Predictive Value.超声 BI-RADS 分类 4 级的再分类:诊断乳腺病变的诊断准确性评估及临床因素对阳性预测值的影响。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019 May;45(5):1253-1258. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.12.008. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
7
Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5.年龄对超声 BI-RADS 类别 3、4 和 5 的 PPV 的影响。
Ultraschall Med. 2011 Jan;32 Suppl 1:S8-13. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245384. Epub 2010 Jul 5.
8
BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.用于超声和乳腺钼靶检查的BI-RADS词典:观察者间的变异性和阳性预测值。
Radiology. 2006 May;239(2):385-91. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2392042127. Epub 2006 Mar 28.
9
Clinical implications of subcategorizing BI-RADS 4 breast lesions associated with microcalcification: a radiology-pathology correlation study.BI-RADS 4 级伴微钙化乳腺病变的亚分类的临床意义:一项放射科-病理相关性研究。
Breast J. 2010 Jan-Feb;16(1):28-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00863.x. Epub 2009 Nov 19.
10
MRI for the assessment of malignancy in BI-RADS 4 mammographic microcalcifications.MRI 评估 BI-RADS 4 类乳腺钼靶微钙化的恶性程度。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 30;12(11):e0188679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188679. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of patient age and breast parenchymal density on Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BIRADS-4) Subcategorization.患者年龄和乳腺实质密度对乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BIRADS-4)分类的影响。
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Nov;40(10):2356-2362. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.10.9552.
2
Application of a second opinion ultrasound in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4A cases: can immediate biopsy be avoided?二次超声会诊在乳腺影像报告与数据系统 4A 类病例中的应用:是否可以避免即刻活检?
J Int Med Res. 2021 Jun;49(6):3000605211024452. doi: 10.1177/03000605211024452.
3
The Positive Predictive Values of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 Lesions and its Mammographic Morphological Features.

本文引用的文献

1
Reducing false-positive biopsies: a pilot study to reduce benign biopsy rates for BI-RADS 4A/B assessments through testing risk stratification and new thresholds for intervention.降低假阳性活检率:一项通过测试风险分层和新的干预阈值来降低 BI-RADS 4A/B 评估的良性活检率的试点研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jun;139(3):769-77. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2576-0. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
2
Simple rules for ultrasonographic subcategorization of BI-RADS®-US 4 breast masses.BI-RADS®-US 4 类乳腺肿块的超声亚型分类简单规则。
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Aug;82(8):1231-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.02.032. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
3
乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)4类病变的阳性预测值及其乳腺X线摄影形态学特征
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021 Mar;12(1):182-189. doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01274-5. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
Mammary carcinoma - current diagnostic methods and symptomatology in imaging studies.
乳腺癌——影像学研究中的当前诊断方法与症状学
Pol J Radiol. 2012 Oct;77(4):35-44. doi: 10.12659/pjr.883627.
4
Determination of information and support needs of first degree relatives of women with breast cancer.乳腺癌女性一级亲属的信息及支持需求测定
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(9):4491-9. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.9.4491.
5
Clinical outcome of breast cancer BI-RADS 4 lesions during 2003-2008 in the National Cancer Institute Thailand.泰国国家癌症研究所2003 - 2008年期间乳腺癌BI - RADS 4级病变的临床结果
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(8):4063-6. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.8.4063.
6
Reproducibility of BI-RADS breast density measures among community radiologists: a prospective cohort study.社区放射科医生间 BI-RADS 乳腺密度测量的可重复性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Breast J. 2012 Jul-Aug;18(4):326-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2012.01250.x. Epub 2012 May 21.
7
Value of the US BI-RADS final assessment following mastectomy: BI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions.乳房切除术后美国放射学会(ACR)乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)最终评估的价值:BI-RADS 4和5类病变
Acta Radiol. 2012 Apr 1;53(3):255-60. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.110597. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
8
Scoring system based on BI-RADS lexicon to predict probability of malignancy in suspicious microcalcifications.基于 BI-RADS 词汇的评分系统预测可疑微钙化恶性肿瘤的概率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 May;19(5):1491-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2167-4. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
9
[Analysis of the positive predictive value of the subcategories of BI-RADS(®) 4 lesions: preliminary results in 880 lesions].[乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS®)4类病变亚类的阳性预测值分析:880例病变的初步结果]
Radiologia. 2012 Nov-Dec;54(6):520-31. doi: 10.1016/j.rx.2011.04.004. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
10
Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5.年龄对超声 BI-RADS 类别 3、4 和 5 的 PPV 的影响。
Ultraschall Med. 2011 Jan;32 Suppl 1:S8-13. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245384. Epub 2010 Jul 5.