Suppr超能文献

R0肝切除术后,合并HBV感染的肝内胆管癌患者的预后优于合并肝内胆管结石的患者:一项倾向评分匹配分析

Prognosis of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinomas with HBV Infection is Better than Those with Hepatolithiasis After R0 Liver Resection: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

作者信息

Wang Qing, Li Jun, Lei Zhengqing, Wu Dong, Si Anfeng, Wang Kui, Wang Yizhou, Wan Xuying, Lau Wan Yee, Shen Feng

机构信息

Department of Hepatic Surgery, The Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Department of General Surgery, Central Hospital of ZiBo, ZiBo, Shandong, China.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jun;24(6):1579-1587. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5751-9. Epub 2017 Jan 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of different causative factors of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) on disease outcome remains largely unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the prognosis of ICC patients with different pathogenic factors after hepatectomy.

METHODS

Data of 731 consecutive patients undergoing R0 liver resection for ICC at The Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital between 2004 and 2010 were analyzed. These patients were divided into the hepatitis B virus-related (HBV-ICC, n = 519), hepatolithiasis-related (stone-ICC, n = 87), HBV plus hepatolithiasis-related (HBV/stone-ICC, n = 45), and other etiologies-related (other-ICC, n = 80) ICC groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to eliminate the baseline differences between these groups.

RESULTS

In these four groups, the 5-year tumor recurrence and overall survival (OS) rates were 75.4, 90.3, 83.0 and 81.9%, and 32.7, 16.3, 17.7 and 22.6%, respectively. The significant differences in recurrence and OS were identified between the HBV- and stone-ICC groups (both p < 0.001). In these two groups, most of the independent prognostic predictors were similar, but tumor diameter >5 cm was demonstrated as a risk factor in the HBV-ICC patients only, and surgical margin <1 cm and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive were demonstrated as risk factors in the stone-ICC patients only. With PSM, 75 patients in each of the HBV- and stone-ICC cohorts were created, and the 5-year recurrence and OS rates were 69.9 versus 88.6, and 34.6 versus 19.2%, respectively (p = 0.017, 0.027).

CONCLUSION

Patients with HBV-ICC achieved better outcomes than those with stone-ICC. This prognostic difference was probably associated with biological malignant invasiveness rather than tumor stage.

摘要

背景

肝内胆管癌(ICC)不同致病因素对疾病预后的影响仍大多未知。本研究旨在评估肝切除术后不同致病因素的ICC患者的预后。

方法

分析了2004年至2010年间在东方肝胆外科医院连续接受R0肝切除的731例ICC患者的数据。这些患者被分为乙型肝炎病毒相关(HBV-ICC,n = 519)、肝内胆管结石相关(结石-ICC,n = 87)、HBV合并肝内胆管结石相关(HBV/结石-ICC,n = 45)以及其他病因相关(其他-ICC,n = 80)的ICC组。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来消除这些组之间的基线差异。

结果

在这四组中,5年肿瘤复发率和总生存率(OS)分别为75.4%、90.3%、83.0%和81.9%,以及32.7%、16.3%、17.7%和22.6%。HBV-ICC组和结石-ICC组之间在复发率和OS方面存在显著差异(均p < 0.001)。在这两组中,大多数独立预后预测因素相似,但肿瘤直径>5 cm仅在HBV-ICC患者中被证明是一个危险因素,手术切缘<1 cm和人表皮生长因子受体2阳性仅在结石-ICC患者中被证明是危险因素。通过PSM,HBV-ICC组和结石-ICC组各创建了75例患者,5年复发率和OS率分别为69.9%对88.6%,以及34.6%对19.2%(p = 0.017,0.027)。

结论

HBV-ICC患者的预后优于结石-ICC患者。这种预后差异可能与生物学恶性侵袭性而非肿瘤分期有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验