ETH Zurich, Center for Security Studies, Haldeneggsteig 4, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Dec;23(6):1597-1616. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9866-y. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
This paper seeks to address research governance by highlighting the notion of public accountability as a complementary tool for the establishment of an ethical resonance space for emerging technologies. Public accountability can render development and design process of emerging technologies transparent through practices of holding those in charge of research accountable for their actions, thereby fostering ethical engagement with their potential negative consequences or side-effects. Through practices such as parliamentary questions, audits, and open letters emerging technologies could be effectively rendered transparent and opened up to broader levels of scrutiny and debate, thereby contributing to a greater adherence of emerging technologies to ethics and moral consensus. Fundamental democratic practices could thus not only lead to better informed choices in design and development processes, but also contribute to more morally substantive outcomes.
本文旨在探讨研究治理,强调公共问责制的概念是新兴技术建立伦理共鸣空间的补充工具。公共问责制可以通过对负责研究的人员追究其行为责任,使新兴技术的开发和设计过程更加透明,从而促进对其潜在负面影响或副作用的道德参与。通过议会提问、审计和公开信等做法,可以使新兴技术得到有效透明化,并接受更广泛的审查和辩论,从而使新兴技术更加符合伦理和道德共识。因此,基本的民主实践不仅可以导致在设计和开发过程中做出更明智的选择,而且还可以促进更具道德实质性的结果。