Tosoian Jeffrey J, Druskin Sasha C, Andreas Darian, Mullane Patrick, Chappidi Meera, Joo Sarah, Ghabili Kamyar, Mamawala Mufaddal, Agostino Joseph, Carter Herbert B, Partin Alan W, Sokoll Lori J, Ross Ashley E
Department of Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
BJU Int. 2017 Dec;120(6):793-798. doi: 10.1111/bju.13762. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
To explore the utility of Prostate Health Index (PHI) density for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) in a contemporary cohort of men presenting for diagnostic evaluation of PCa.
The study cohort included patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA; >2 ng/mL) and negative digital rectal examination who underwent PHI testing and prostate biopsy at our institution in 2015. Serum markers were prospectively measured per standard clinical pathway. PHI was calculated as ([{-2}proPSA/free PSA] × [PSA] ), and density calculations were performed using prostate volume as determined by transrectal ultrasonography. Logistic regression was used to assess the ability of serum markers to predict clinically significant PCa, defined as any Gleason score ≥7 cancer or Gleason score 6 cancer in >2 cores or >50% of any positive core.
Of 118 men with PHI testing who underwent biopsy, 47 (39.8%) were found to have clinically significant PCa on biopsy. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) PHI density was 0.70 (0.43-1.21), and was 0.53 (0.36-0.75) in men with negative biopsy or clinically insignificant PCa and 1.21 (0.74-1.88) in men with clinically significant PCa (P < 0.001). Clinically significant PCa was detected in 3.6% of men in the first quartile of PHI density (<0.43), 36.7% of men in the IQR of PHI density (0.43-1.21), and 80.0% of men with PHI density >1.21 (P < 0.001). Using a threshold of 0.43, PHI density was 97.9% sensitive and 38.0% specific for clinically significant PCa, and 100% sensitive for Gleason score ≥7 disease. Compared with PSA (area under the curve [AUC] 0.52), PSA density (AUC 0.70), %free PSA (AUC 0.75), the product of %free PSA and prostate volume (AUC 0.79), and PHI (AUC 0.76), PHI density had the highest discriminative ability for clinically significant PCa (AUC 0.84).
Based on the present prospective single-centre experience, PHI density could be used to avoid 38% of unnecessary biopsies, while failing to detect only 2% of clinically significant cancers.
探讨前列腺健康指数(PHI)密度在当代一组因前列腺癌(PCa)诊断评估而就诊的男性人群中检测临床显著性前列腺癌(PCa)的效用。
研究队列包括2015年在我们机构接受PHI检测和前列腺活检的前列腺特异性抗原(PSA;>2 ng/mL)升高且直肠指检阴性的患者。按照标准临床路径前瞻性地检测血清标志物。PHI计算公式为([-2]游离前列腺特异性抗原/游离PSA]×[PSA]),密度计算使用经直肠超声测定的前列腺体积。采用逻辑回归评估血清标志物预测临床显著性PCa的能力,临床显著性PCa定义为任何Gleason评分≥7的癌症或Gleason评分6的癌症在2个以上穿刺针芯或任何阳性穿刺针芯的>50%。
118名接受活检的PHI检测男性中,47名(39.8%)活检发现有临床显著性PCa。PHI密度的中位数(四分位间距[IQR])为0.70(0.43 - 1.21),活检阴性或临床非显著性PCa的男性为0.53(0.36 - 0.75),临床显著性PCa的男性为1.21(0.74 - 1.88)(P < 0.001)。在PHI密度第一四分位数(<0.43)的男性中,3.6%检测到临床显著性PCa,在PHI密度IQR(0.43 - 1.21)的男性中为36.7%,在PHI密度>1.21的男性中为80.0%(P < 0.001)。以0.43为阈值,PHI密度对临床显著性PCa的敏感性为97.9%,特异性为38.0%,对Gleason评分≥7的疾病敏感性为100%。与PSA(曲线下面积[AUC] 0.52)、PSA密度(AUC 0.70)、游离PSA百分比(AUC 0.75)、游离PSA百分比与前列腺体积的乘积(AUC 0.79)以及PHI(AUC 0.76)相比,PHI密度对临床显著性PCa具有最高的鉴别能力(AUC 0.84)。
基于目前前瞻性单中心经验,PHI密度可用于避免38%的不必要活检,同时仅漏检2%的临床显著性癌症。