Anderson Monique L, Peragallo Urrutia Rachel, O'Brien Emily C, Allen LaPointe Nancy M, Christian Alexander J, Kaltenbach Lisa A, Webb Laura E, Alexander Angel M, Saha Chaudhuri Paramita, Crawford Juliana, Wayte Patrick, Peterson Eric D
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017 May;19(5):479-487. doi: 10.1111/jch.12950. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
Single-site, intensive, community-based blood pressure (BP) intervention programs have led to BP improvements. The authors examined the American Heart Association's Check. Change.
(CCC) program (4069 patients/18 cities) to determine whether BP interventions can effectively be scaled to multiple communities, using a simplified template and local customization. Effectiveness was evaluated at each site via site percent enrollment goals, participant engagement, and BP change from first to last measurement. High-enrolling sites frequently recruited at senior residential institutions and service organizations held hypertension management classes and utilized established and new community partners. High-engagement sites regularly held hypertension education classes and followed up with participants. Top-performing sites commonly distributed BP cuffs, checked BP at engagement activities, and trained volunteers. CCC demonstrated that simplified community-based hypertension intervention programs may lead to BP improvements, but there was high outcomes variability among programs. Several factors were associated with BP improvement that may guide future program development.
单地点、强化、基于社区的血压(BP)干预项目已使血压得到改善。作者对美国心脏协会的“检查。改变。控制”(CCC)项目(4069名患者/18个城市)进行了研究,以确定是否可以使用简化模板和本地化定制将血压干预有效地推广到多个社区。通过各地点的入组百分比目标、参与者参与度以及首次测量到最后一次测量的血压变化来评估每个地点的有效性。高入组率地点经常在老年居住机构和服务组织招募人员,举办高血压管理课程,并利用已有的和新的社区合作伙伴。高参与度地点定期举办高血压教育课程并对参与者进行随访。表现最佳的地点通常分发血压袖带,在参与活动时检查血压,并培训志愿者。CCC表明,简化的基于社区的高血压干预项目可能会使血压得到改善,但各项目之间的结果差异很大。有几个因素与血压改善相关,这可能会为未来的项目开发提供指导。