• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对偶然感知到的社会线索的记忆:对人物判断的影响。

Memory for incidentally perceived social cues: Effects on person judgment.

作者信息

Pawling Ralph, Kirkham Alexander J, Tipper Steven P, Over Harriet

机构信息

School of Natural Sciences & Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.

Department of Psychology, University of York, York, UK.

出版信息

Br J Psychol. 2017 Feb;108(1):169-190. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12182. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1111/bjop.12182
PMID:28059460
Abstract

Dynamic face cues can be very salient, as when observing sudden shifts of gaze to a new location, or a change of expression from happy to angry. These highly salient social cues influence judgments of another person during the course of an interaction. However, other dynamic cues, such as pupil dilation, are much more subtle, affecting judgments of another person even without awareness. We asked whether such subtle, incidentally perceived, dynamic cues could be encoded in to memory and retrieved at a later time. The current study demonstrates that in some circumstances changes in pupil size in another person are indeed encoded into memory and influence judgments of that individual at a later time. Furthermore, these judgments interact with the perceived trustworthiness of the individual and the nature of the social context. The effect is somewhat variable, however, possibly reflecting individual differences and the inherent ambiguity of pupil dilation/constriction.

摘要

动态面部线索可能非常显著,比如观察到目光突然转向新位置,或者表情从高兴变为愤怒时。这些高度显著的社交线索在互动过程中会影响对他人的判断。然而,其他动态线索,如瞳孔扩张,则要微妙得多,即使在没有意识的情况下也会影响对他人的判断。我们询问了这种微妙的、偶然察觉到的动态线索是否能够被编码到记忆中,并在之后被提取出来。当前的研究表明,在某些情况下,他人瞳孔大小的变化确实会被编码到记忆中,并在之后影响对该个体的判断。此外,这些判断还会与对该个体的可信赖程度的感知以及社交背景的性质相互作用。不过,这种效应有些多变,可能反映了个体差异以及瞳孔扩张/收缩所固有的模糊性。

相似文献

1
Memory for incidentally perceived social cues: Effects on person judgment.对偶然感知到的社会线索的记忆:对人物判断的影响。
Br J Psychol. 2017 Feb;108(1):169-190. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12182. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
2
Judging trustworthiness from faces: Emotion cues modulate trustworthiness judgments in young children.从面部判断可信度:情绪线索调节幼儿对可信度的判断。
Br J Psychol. 2016 Aug;107(3):503-18. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12156. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
3
Facial trustworthiness judgments in children with ASD are modulated by happy and angry emotional cues.患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的儿童对面部可信度的判断会受到快乐和愤怒情绪线索的调节。
PLoS One. 2014 May 30;9(5):e97644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097644. eCollection 2014.
4
Effects of Photo-Depicted Pupil Diameter on Judgments of Others' Attentiveness and on Facial Recognition Memory.照片描绘的瞳孔直径对他人注意力判断及面部识别记忆的影响。
Percept Mot Skills. 2017 Apr;124(2):366-379. doi: 10.1177/0031512516685191. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
5
Do I trust you when you smile? Effects of sex and emotional expression on facial trustworthiness appraisal.当你微笑时,我是否信任你?性别和情感表达对面部可信度评价的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0243230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243230. eCollection 2020.
6
Similarities and differences in Chinese and Caucasian adults' use of facial cues for trustworthiness judgments.中文和高加索成年人在使用面部线索判断可信度方面的相似性和差异。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034859. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
7
Trustworthiness judgments without the halo effect: A data-driven computational modeling approach.无晕轮效应的可信度判断:一种数据驱动的计算建模方法。
Perception. 2023 Aug;52(8):590-607. doi: 10.1177/03010066231178489. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
8
CHILDREN'S AND ADULTS' JUDGMENTS OF FACIAL TRUSTWORTHINESS: THE RELATIONSHIP TO FACIAL ATTRACTIVENESS.儿童与成人对面部可信度的判断:与面部吸引力的关系。
Percept Mot Skills. 2015 Aug;121(1):179-98. doi: 10.2466/27.22.PMS.121c10x1. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
9
What is typical is good: the influence of face typicality on perceived trustworthiness.典型的就是好的:面孔典型性对可感知可信度的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jan;26(1):39-47. doi: 10.1177/0956797614554955. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
10
Do social utility judgments influence attentional processing?社会效用判断是否会影响注意力加工?
Cognition. 2013 Oct;129(1):114-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.011. Epub 2013 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Rapid detection of social interactions is the result of domain general attentional processes.社会互动的快速检测是领域通用注意力过程的结果。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 14;17(1):e0258832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258832. eCollection 2022.