• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

土地管理偏好的近端关联:来自家庭森林所有者的证据。

Proximal Association of Land Management Preferences: Evidence from Family Forest Owners.

作者信息

Aguilar Francisco X, Cai Zhen, Butler Brett

机构信息

The School of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.

The Center for Agroforestry, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Jan 6;12(1):e0169667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169667. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0169667
PMID:28060960
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5218549/
Abstract

Individual behavior is influenced by factors intrinsic to the decision-maker but also associated with other individuals and their ownerships with such relationship intensified by geographic proximity. The land management literature is scarce in the spatially integrated analysis of biophysical and socio-economic data. Localized land management decisions are likely driven by spatially-explicit but often unobserved resource conditions, influenced by an individual's own characteristics, proximal lands and fellow owners. This study examined stated choices over the management of family-owned forests as an example of a resource that captures strong pecuniary and non-pecuniary values with identifiable decision makers. An autoregressive model controlled for spatially autocorrelated willingness-to-harvest (WTH) responses using a sample of residential and absentee family forest owners from the U.S. State of Missouri. WTH responses were largely explained by affective, cognitive and experience variables including timber production objectives and past harvest experience. Demographic variables, including income and age, were associated with WTH and helped define socially-proximal groups. The group of closest identity was comprised of resident males over 55 years of age with annual income of at least $50,000. Spatially-explicit models showed that indirect impacts, capturing spillover associations, on average accounted for 14% of total marginal impacts among statistically significant explanatory variables. We argue that not all proximal family forest owners are equal and owners-in-absentia have discernible differences in WTH preferences with important implications for public policy and future research.

摘要

个体行为不仅受到决策者内在因素的影响,还与其他个体及其所有权相关,这种关系会因地理 proximity 而增强。土地管理文献在生物物理和社会经济数据的空间综合分析方面较为匮乏。局部土地管理决策可能由空间明确但往往未被观察到的资源条件驱动,受到个体自身特征、邻近土地和共同所有者的影响。本研究以家庭拥有的森林管理为例,考察了既定选择,这种资源体现了可识别决策者的强烈货币和非货币价值。使用来自美国密苏里州的住宅和非居住家庭森林所有者样本,一个自回归模型控制了空间自相关的收获意愿(WTH)反应。WTH 反应在很大程度上由情感、认知和经验变量解释,包括木材生产目标和过去的收获经验。人口统计学变量,包括收入和年龄,与 WTH 相关,并有助于定义社会邻近群体。最相近身份的群体由 55 岁以上、年收入至少 5 万美元的居住男性组成。空间明确模型表明,捕捉溢出关联的间接影响平均占统计显著解释变量总边际影响的 14%。我们认为并非所有邻近的家庭森林所有者都是平等的,非居住所有者在 WTH 偏好上有明显差异,这对公共政策和未来研究具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24bb/5218549/9d736b3059b3/pone.0169667.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24bb/5218549/9d736b3059b3/pone.0169667.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24bb/5218549/9d736b3059b3/pone.0169667.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Proximal Association of Land Management Preferences: Evidence from Family Forest Owners.土地管理偏好的近端关联:来自家庭森林所有者的证据。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 6;12(1):e0169667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169667. eCollection 2017.
2
Social and biophysical variation in regional timber harvest regimes.区域木材采伐制度的社会和生物物理变化。
Ecol Appl. 2017 Apr;27(3):942-955. doi: 10.1002/eap.1497. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
3
Conservation perspectives of small-scale private forest owners in Europe: A systematic review.欧洲小规模私有林主的保护观点:系统评价。
Ambio. 2022 Apr;51(4):836-848. doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01615-w. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
4
Designing a carbon market that protects forests in developing countries.设计一个保护发展中国家森林的碳市场。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2002 Aug 15;360(1797):1875-88. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2002.1037.
5
An Agent-Based Model of Private Woodland Owner Management Behavior Using Social Interactions, Information Flow, and Peer-To-Peer Networks.一种基于主体的私有林地所有者管理行为模型,该模型运用了社会互动、信息流和对等网络。
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 12;10(11):e0142453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142453. eCollection 2015.
6
Beyond reaping the first harvest: management objectives for timber production in the Brazilian Amazon.收获首季成果之后:巴西亚马逊地区木材生产的管理目标
Conserv Biol. 2007 Aug;21(4):916-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00670.x.
7
[Management modes of different ownership forests and their ecological effects: a review].[不同所有制森林的经营模式及其生态效应综述]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2011 Jun;22(6):1623-31.
8
Analysis and deliberation as a mechanism to assess changes in preferences for indicators of sustainable forest management: a case study in Puebla, Mexico.分析和审议作为评估可持续森林管理指标偏好变化的机制:墨西哥普埃布拉的案例研究。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Oct 15;128:52-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.051. Epub 2013 May 27.
9
Consider the source: the impact of media and authority in outreach to private forest and rangeland owners.考虑来源:媒体和权威机构在对私人林地和牧场所有者进行外展活动中的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Apr 30;97:131-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.10.017. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
10
Classifying private landowners to improve understanding of management decisions and conservation opportunities in urbanizing forested landscapes.对私有土地所有者进行分类,以增进对城市森林景观中管理决策和保护机会的理解。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Feb 15;232:751-758. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.128. Epub 2018 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Knowledge and Value Basis of Private Forest Management in Sweden: Actual Knowledge, Confidence, and Value Priorities.瑞典私有林经营的知识和价值基础:实际知识、信心和价值优先事项。
Environ Manage. 2020 Oct;66(4):549-563. doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01328-y. Epub 2020 Jul 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Integrating social identity theory and the theory of planned behaviour to explain decisions to engage in sustainable agricultural practices.整合社会认同理论和计划行为理论以解释参与可持续农业实践的决策。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2008 Mar;47(Pt 1):23-48. doi: 10.1348/014466607X206792.
2
Explaining landholders' decisions about riparian zone management: the role of behavioural, normative, and control beliefs.解释土地所有者关于河岸带管理的决策:行为、规范和控制信念的作用。
J Environ Manage. 2005 Oct;77(1):12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.03.002.
3
Land-use dynamics in a southern Illinois (USA) watershed.
美国伊利诺伊州南部一个流域的土地利用动态
Environ Manage. 2001 Sep;28(3):325-40. doi: 10.1007/s002672426.