• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管胃交界部收缩积分与形态:抗反流屏障的两个高分辨率测压指标。

Esophagogastric junction contractile integral and morphology: Two high-resolution manometry metrics of the anti-reflux barrier.

作者信息

Ham Hyoju, Cho Yu Kyung, Lee Han Hee, Yoon Seung Bae, Lim Chul-Hyun, Kim Jin Su, Park Jae Myung, Choi Myung-Gyu

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, The College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Aug;32(8):1443-1449. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13720.

DOI:10.1111/jgh.13720
PMID:28061013
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

We evaluated associations of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) metrics as an anti-reflux barrier with impedance-pH, endoscopic esophagitis, and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) metrics.

METHODS

We reviewed high-resolution manometry data from consecutive patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms who underwent impedance-pH and endoscopy, and asymptomatic volunteers. The EGJ contractile integral (CI) was calculated as the mean contractile integral/second during three respiratory cycles. EGJ morphology was classified according to LES-crural diaphragm (CD) separation.

RESULTS

In total, 137 patients (65 male, age 55 years) and 23 (9 male, age 33 years) controls were enrolled. Twenty-five patients had erosive reflux disease (ERD), 16 had non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), 5 had reflux hypersensitivity, and 91 were not GERD. EGJ-CI were lower in patients with GERD (22.6 [13.8-29.2] mmHg cm) than non-GERD (50.3 [31-69.9] mmHg cm, P < 0.01) and controls (67 [26.7-78.7] mmHg cm). With an EGJ-CI cut-off value of 30 mmHg cm, the area under the curve was 0.814 (0.762-0.896), with 77.8% sensitivity and 81.7% specificity for the prediction of GERD. LES-CD separation was greatest in patients with ERD, followed the NERD, non-GERD, and controls. EGJ morphology type III was associated with a higher DeMeester score (7.9 [1.6-12.6]) than were type II (3.25 [0.9-5.975]) and I (1.75 [0.8-6.2]; P < 0.01). EGJ-CI values were lower in patients with GERD than in others in each EGJ morphology subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Esophagogastric junction contractile integral showed good diagnostic accuracy with high specificity in predicting GERD. LES-CD separation is associated with an increase in acid reflux, but EGJ-CI was associated more strongly with GERD than was EGJ morphology.

摘要

背景与目的

我们评估了食管胃交界(EGJ)指标作为抗反流屏障与阻抗-pH、内镜下食管炎及食管下括约肌(LES)指标之间的关联。

方法

我们回顾了连续的有胃食管反流病(GERD)症状且接受了阻抗-pH检查和内镜检查的患者以及无症状志愿者的高分辨率测压数据。EGJ收缩积分(CI)计算为三个呼吸周期内的平均收缩积分/秒。EGJ形态根据LES-膈脚(CD)分离情况进行分类。

结果

共纳入137例患者(65例男性,年龄55岁)和23例对照(9例男性,年龄33岁)。25例患者患有糜烂性反流病(ERD),16例患有非糜烂性反流病(NERD),5例患有反流高敏症,91例不是GERD患者。GERD患者的EGJ-CI(22.6 [13.8 - 29.2] mmHg·cm)低于非GERD患者(50.3 [31 - 69.9] mmHg·cm,P < 0.01)和对照(67 [26.7 - 78.7] mmHg·cm)。以EGJ-CI截断值30 mmHg·cm计算,曲线下面积为0.814(0.762 - 0.896),预测GERD的敏感性为77.8%,特异性为81.7%。LES-CD分离在ERD患者中最大,其次是NERD患者、非GERD患者和对照。EGJ形态III型的DeMeester评分(7.9 [1.6 - 12.6])高于II型(3.25 [0.9 - 5.975])和I型(1.75 [0.8 - 6.2];P < 0.01)。在每个EGJ形态亚组中,GERD患者的EGJ-CI值均低于其他患者。

结论

食管胃交界收缩积分在预测GERD方面具有良好的诊断准确性和高特异性。LES-CD分离与酸反流增加有关,但EGJ-CI与GERD的关联比EGJ形态更强。

相似文献

1
Esophagogastric junction contractile integral and morphology: Two high-resolution manometry metrics of the anti-reflux barrier.食管胃交界部收缩积分与形态:抗反流屏障的两个高分辨率测压指标。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Aug;32(8):1443-1449. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13720.
2
Esophagogastric junction contractility for clinical assessment in patients with GERD: a real added value?胃食管交界处收缩功能在胃食管反流病患者临床评估中的作用:真的具有附加价值吗?
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Oct;27(10):1423-31. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12638. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
3
[The characteristics of esophagogastric junction contractile index in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease or functional heartburn].[胃食管反流病或功能性烧心患者食管胃交界收缩指数的特征]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Apr 1;55(4):283-8. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2016.04.007.
4
Esophagogastric junction morphology is associated with a positive impedance-pH monitoring in patients with GERD.食管胃交界部形态与胃食管反流病患者阻抗-pH监测阳性相关。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Aug;27(8):1175-82. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12606. Epub 2015 May 25.
5
Esophagogastric Junction Morphology and Distal Esophageal Acid Exposure.食管胃交界部形态与食管远端酸暴露
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Dec;61(12):3537-3544. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4331-y. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
6
Prolonged measurement improves the assessment of the barrier function of the esophago-gastric junction by high-resolution manometry.通过高分辨率测压法进行长时间测量可改善对食管胃交界处屏障功能的评估。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Feb;29(2). doi: 10.1111/nmo.12925. Epub 2016 Aug 14.
7
Esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI) quantifies changes in EGJ barrier function with surgical intervention.食管胃交界部收缩积分(EGJ-CI)可量化手术干预后食管胃交界部屏障功能的变化。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 May;28(5):639-46. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12757. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
8
High-resolution manometry of the EGJ: an analysis of crural diaphragm function in GERD.食管胃交界部的高分辨率测压:胃食管反流病中膈脚功能的分析
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 May;102(5):1056-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01138.x. Epub 2007 Feb 23.
9
High-resolution Manometry can Characterize Esophagogastric Junction Morphology and Predict Esophageal Reflux Burden.高分辨率测压法可用于食管胃结合部形态学特征分析并预测食管反流负担。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan;54(1):22-27. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001205.
10
Simple Manometric Index for Comprehensive Esophagogastric Junction Barrier Competency Against Gastroesophageal Reflux.综合食管胃结合部屏障能力对抗胃食管反流的简易测压指数
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 May;230(5):744-755e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.01.034. Epub 2020 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation between the type of esophagogastric junction and refractory reflux esophagitis.食管胃交界类型与难治性反流性食管炎之间的相关性。
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2025 Jun 15;18(6):267-273. doi: 10.62347/MFPG6371. eCollection 2025.
2
The impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease on upper esophageal sphincter function: Insights from PH impedance and high-resolution manometry.胃食管反流病对上食管括约肌功能的影响:PH 阻抗和高分辨率测压法的见解。
Physiol Rep. 2024 Aug;12(16):e70011. doi: 10.14814/phy2.70011.
3
Utilizing Esophageal Motility Tests in Diagnosing and Evaluating Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.
利用食管动力测试诊断和评估胃食管反流病。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jul 9;14(14):1467. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14141467.
4
Manometric esophagogastric junction barrier metrics as predictors of gastroesophageal reflux.测压法食管胃结合部屏障指标预测胃食管反流。
Esophagus. 2024 Jul;21(3):397-404. doi: 10.1007/s10388-024-01057-9. Epub 2024 May 1.
5
Esophageal motor abnormalities in gastroesophageal reflux disorders.胃食管反流病中的食管运动异常。
Tzu Chi Med J. 2024 Mar 26;36(2):120-126. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_209_23. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
6
Is there a direct relationship between hiatal hernia size, esophageal body hypomotility and symptomatic perception of gastroesophageal reflux episodes?食管裂孔疝大小、食管体部运动功能减退与胃食管反流发作的症状感知之间是否存在直接关系?
Ann Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov-Dec;36(6):599-604. doi: 10.20524/aog.2023.0830. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
7
Contraction reserve in high resolution manometry is correlated with lower esophageal acid exposure time in patients with normal esophageal motility: A retrospective observational study.高分辨率测压中的收缩储备与正常食管动力患者的食管酸暴露时间呈负相关:一项回顾性观察研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 2;18(11):e0291010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291010. eCollection 2023.
8
Risk factors and 26-years worldwide prevalence of endoscopic erosive esophagitis from 1997 to 2022: a meta-analysis.风险因素与 1997 年至 2022 年 26 年间全球范围内内镜下侵蚀性食管炎的患病率:一项荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 14;13(1):15249. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42636-7.
9
Novel Diagnostic Techniques in the Evaluation of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD).胃食管反流病(GERD)评估中的新型诊断技术。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Jun;68(6):2226-2236. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-07901-9. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
10
Length of the Barrett's Esophagus Is Proportional to the Abnormality of Esophageal Motility and Anti-reflux Barrier.巴雷特食管的长度与食管动力和抗反流屏障的异常程度成正比。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Jan 30;29(1):5-6. doi: 10.5056/jnm22215.