Suppr超能文献

测压法食管胃结合部屏障指标预测胃食管反流。

Manometric esophagogastric junction barrier metrics as predictors of gastroesophageal reflux.

机构信息

New York University Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA.

Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Center for Esophageal Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Esophagus. 2024 Jul;21(3):397-404. doi: 10.1007/s10388-024-01057-9. Epub 2024 May 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-resolution manometry (HRM) tools, like esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI), assess EGJ barrier function.

GOALS

This study aimed to evaluate the relationships between manometric EGJ metrics with esophageal acid exposure.

STUDY

We conducted a retrospective review of 284 patients who underwent HRM and ambulatory reflux testing between 11/2017-1/2020. EGJ-CI and total-EGJ-CI were manually calculated. Pathologic acid exposure was defined as pH  < 4 with esophageal acid exposure time (EAET) exceeding 6.0%. Pearson's correlation, univariable and multivariable regression models were utilized to assess the relationships between pathologic acid exposure and EGJ parameters. Sensitivity and specificity thresholds for EGJ-CI and total EGJ-CI were optimized with ROC analyses.

RESULTS

On univariable analysis, patients with pathologic acid exposure had increased odds of having lower mean basal LES pressures, EGJ-CI, and total EGJ-CI than patients without pathologic acid exposure. On multivariable analysis, age, EGJ-CI and mean DCI were significant predictors of pathologic acid exposure. There were significant, though weak, correlations between EAET and EGJ-CI and total EGJ-CI (r =  - 0.18,  - 0.19, p < 0.01, respectively). An EGJ-CI cutoff of 44.16 as a predictor for pathologic acid exposure had a sensitivity of 46% and specificity of 42% (AUC 0.60). Total EGJ-CI cutoff of 11,461.3 for pathologic acid exposure had a sensitivity of 44% and a specificity of 43% (AUC 0.62).

CONCLUSION

EGJ-CI can independently predict pathologic acid exposure. However, the poor correlation between EGJ-CI and acid exposure, as well as the low sensitivity and specificity of calculated thresholds, indicate that mechanisms other than EGJ barrier function may impact acid exposure.

摘要

背景

高分辨率测压(HRM)工具,如食管胃结合部收缩积分(EGJ-CI),可评估食管胃结合部(EGJ)的屏障功能。

目的

本研究旨在评估测压法 EGJ 指标与食管酸暴露之间的关系。

研究

我们对 2017 年 11 月至 2020 年 1 月间接受 HRM 和动态反流测试的 284 例患者进行了回顾性分析。手动计算 EGJ-CI 和总 EGJ-CI。病理性酸暴露定义为 pH<4 且食管酸暴露时间(EAET)超过 6.0%。采用 Pearson 相关分析、单变量和多变量回归模型评估病理性酸暴露与 EGJ 参数之间的关系。采用 ROC 分析优化 EGJ-CI 和总 EGJ-CI 的截断值。

结果

单变量分析显示,病理性酸暴露患者的平均基础 LES 压力、EGJ-CI 和总 EGJ-CI 均低于无病理性酸暴露患者。多变量分析显示,年龄、EGJ-CI 和平均 DCI 是病理性酸暴露的显著预测因子。EAET 与 EGJ-CI 和总 EGJ-CI 之间存在显著但较弱的相关性(r= -0.18、-0.19,p<0.01)。EGJ-CI 截断值为 44.16 预测病理性酸暴露的敏感性为 46%,特异性为 42%(AUC 0.60)。总 EGJ-CI 截断值为 11461.3 预测病理性酸暴露的敏感性为 44%,特异性为 43%(AUC 0.62)。

结论

EGJ-CI 可独立预测病理性酸暴露。然而,EGJ-CI 与酸暴露之间的相关性较差,以及计算出的截断值的敏感性和特异性较低,表明除了 EGJ 屏障功能外,其他机制也可能影响酸暴露。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验