Suppr超能文献

食管胃交界部收缩积分(EGJ-CI)可量化手术干预后食管胃交界部屏障功能的变化。

Esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI) quantifies changes in EGJ barrier function with surgical intervention.

作者信息

Wang D, Patel A, Mello M, Shriver A, Gyawali C P

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Gastroenterology Department, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.

出版信息

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 May;28(5):639-46. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12757. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI) assesses EGJ barrier function on esophageal high resolution manometry (HRM). We assessed EGJ-CI values in achalasia and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) to determine if postoperative EGJ-CI changes reflected surgical intervention.

METHODS

Twenty-one achalasia patients (42.8 ± 3.2 years, 62% F) with HRM before and after Heller myotomy (HM) and 68 GERD patients (53.9 ± 1.8 years, 66% F) undergoing antireflux surgery (ARS) were compared to 21 healthy controls (27.6 ± 0.6 years, 52% F). Esophagogastric junction contractile integral (mmHg.cm) was calculated using the distal contractile integral measurement across the EGJ, measured above the gastric baseline and corrected for respiration. Pre and postsurgical EGJ-CI and conventional lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) metrics were compared within and between these groups using non-parametric tests. Correlation between EGJ-CI and conventional LESP metrics was assessed.

KEY RESULTS

Baseline EGJ-CI was higher in achalasia compared to GERD (p < 0.001) or controls (p = 0.03). Esophagogastric junction contractile integral declined by 59.2% after HM in achalasia (p = 0.001), and increased by 26.3% after ARS in GERD (p = 0.005). End-expiratory and basal LESP decreased by 74.5% and 64.5% with HM, but increased by only 17.8% and 4.3% with ARS. Differences were noted between Dor vs Toupet fundoplication in achalasia (p = 0.007), and partial vs complete ARS in GERD (p = 0.03). Esophagogastric junction contractile integral correlated modestly with both end-expiratory and basal LESP (Pearson's r of 0.8 for all), but was less robust in GERD (0.7).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Esophagogastric junction contractile integral has clinical utility in assessing EGJ barrier function at baseline and after surgical intervention to the EGJ, and could complement conventional EGJ metrics.

摘要

背景

食管胃交界部收缩积分(EGJ-CI)用于评估食管高分辨率测压(HRM)时的食管胃交界部屏障功能。我们评估了贲门失弛缓症和胃食管反流病(GERD)患者的EGJ-CI值,以确定术后EGJ-CI的变化是否反映了手术干预。

方法

将21例贲门失弛缓症患者(42.8±3.2岁,62%为女性)在海勒肌切开术(HM)前后进行HRM检查,以及68例接受抗反流手术(ARS)的GERD患者(53.9±1.8岁,66%为女性)与21名健康对照者(27.6±0.6岁,52%为女性)进行比较。食管胃交界部收缩积分(mmHg.cm)通过在食管胃交界部上方测量的远端收缩积分计算得出,以胃基线为参照,并进行呼吸校正。使用非参数检验对这些组内和组间的术前和术后EGJ-CI以及传统的食管下括约肌压力(LESP)指标进行比较。评估EGJ-CI与传统LESP指标之间的相关性。

主要结果

与GERD(p<0.001)或对照组(p=0.03)相比,贲门失弛缓症患者的基线EGJ-CI更高。贲门失弛缓症患者在HM后EGJ-CI下降了59.2%(p=0.001),而GERD患者在ARS后EGJ-CI增加了26.3%(p=0.005)。呼气末和基础LESP在HM后分别下降了74.5%和64.5%,而在ARS后仅分别增加了17.8%和4.3%。贲门失弛缓症患者中,Dor术式与Toupet胃底折叠术之间存在差异(p=0.007),GERD患者中部分抗反流手术与完全抗反流手术之间存在差异(p=0.03)。EGJ-CI与呼气末及基础LESP均呈适度相关(Pearson相关系数均为0.8),但在GERD患者中相关性较弱(0.7)。

结论与推论

食管胃交界部收缩积分在评估基线时以及对食管胃交界部进行手术干预后的食管胃交界部屏障功能方面具有临床应用价值,并且可以补充传统的食管胃交界部指标。

相似文献

1
Esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI) quantifies changes in EGJ barrier function with surgical intervention.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 May;28(5):639-46. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12757. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
4
Novel 3D high-resolution manometry metrics for quantifying esophagogastric junction contractility.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Aug;29(8). doi: 10.1111/nmo.13054. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
5
Esophagogastric junction and esophageal body contraction metrics on high-resolution manometry predict esophageal acid burden.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018 May;30(5):e13267. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13267. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
8
Esophagogastric junction contractility for clinical assessment in patients with GERD: a real added value?
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Oct;27(10):1423-31. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12638. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
10
Correlation between novel 3D high-resolution manometry esophagogastric junction metrics and pH-metry in reflux disease patients.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018 Sep;30(9):e13344. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13344. Epub 2018 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
2
Utilizing Esophageal Motility Tests in Diagnosing and Evaluating Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jul 9;14(14):1467. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14141467.
3
Esophageal motor abnormalities in gastroesophageal reflux disorders.
Tzu Chi Med J. 2024 Mar 26;36(2):120-126. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_209_23. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
4
Novel Diagnostic Techniques in the Evaluation of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD).
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Jun;68(6):2226-2236. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-07901-9. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
5
Esophageal manometry findings in patients with refractory symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2022 Oct;41(5):508-512. doi: 10.1007/s12664-022-01259-y. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
6
Concise Review: Applicability of High-resolution Manometry in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022 Oct 30;28(4):531-539. doi: 10.5056/jnm22082.
7
Current Advancement on the Dynamic Mechanism of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.
Int J Biol Sci. 2021 Oct 3;17(15):4154-4164. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.65066. eCollection 2021.
9
Diagnosis and Management of Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2021 Jul;17(7):305-315.
10
Chicago Classification update (v4.0): Technical review of high-resolution manometry metrics for EGJ barrier function.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Oct;33(10):e14113. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14113. Epub 2021 Mar 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Esophagogastric junction contractility for clinical assessment in patients with GERD: a real added value?
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Oct;27(10):1423-31. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12638. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
3
Optimizing the high-resolution manometry (HRM) study protocol.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Feb;27(2):300-4. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12494. Epub 2015 Jan 1.
4
The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Feb;27(2):160-74. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12477. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
5
Esophageal motor function: technical aspects of manometry.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2014 Oct;24(4):527-43. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
7
Preoperative factors predicting clinical outcome following laparoscopic fundoplication.
World J Surg. 2014 Jun;38(6):1431-43. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2415-9.
8
Esophagogastric Junction pressure morphology: comparison between a station pull-through and real-time 3D-HRM representation.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013 Sep;25(9):e591-8. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12168. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
9
Adding a radial dimension to the assessment of esophagogastric junction relaxation: validation studies of the 3D-eSleeve.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2012 Aug 1;303(3):G275-80. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00063.2012. Epub 2012 May 24.
10
Fragmented esophageal smooth muscle contraction segments on high resolution manometry: a marker of esophageal hypomotility.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 Aug;24(8):763-8, e353. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01930.x. Epub 2012 May 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验