• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

独立癌症中心能改善头颈显微外科手术的疗效吗?

Does a Standalone Cancer Center Improve Head and Neck Microsurgical Outcomes?

作者信息

Tamplen Matthew L, Tamplen Jesse, Torrecillas Vanessa, Seth Rahul, Ricceri Santo, Hemmat Shirin, Heaton Chase, Ryan William R, Knott P Daniel

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Lean Transformation Office, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

出版信息

J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017 May;33(4):252-256. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597757. Epub 2017 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1055/s-0036-1597757
PMID:28061519
Abstract

To evaluate the role of hospital setting (standalone cancer center vs. large multidisciplinary hospital) on free tissue transfer (FTT) outcomes for head and neck reconstruction.  Medical records were reviewed of 180 consecutive patients undergoing FTT for head and neck reconstruction. Operations occurred at either a standalone academic cancer center ( = 101) or a large multidisciplinary academic medical center ( = 79) by the same surgeons. Patient outcomes, operative comparisons, and hospital costs were compared between the hospital settings.  The cancer center group had higher mean age (65.2 vs. 60 years;  = 0.009) and a shorter mean operative time (12.3 vs. 13.2 hours;  = 0.034). Postoperatively, the cancer center group had a significantly shorter average ICU stay (3.45 vs. 4.41 days;  < 0.001). There were no significant differences in medical or surgical complications between the groups. Having surgery at the cancer center was the only significant independent predictor of a reduced ICU stay on multivariate analysis (Coef 0.73;  < 0.020). Subgroup analysis, including only patients with cancer of the aerodigestive tract, demonstrated further reduction in ICU stay for the cancer center group (3.85 vs. 5.1 days;  < 0.001). A cost analysis demonstrated that the reduction in ICU saved $223,816 for the cancer center group.  Standalone subspecialty cancer centers are safe and appropriate settings for FTT. We found both reduced operative time and ICU length of stay, both of which contributed to lower overall costs. These findings challenge the concept that FTT requires a large multidisciplinary hospital.  4.

摘要

评估医院环境(独立癌症中心与大型多学科医院)对头颈部重建中游离组织移植(FTT)结果的作用。回顾了180例连续接受FTT进行头颈部重建患者的病历。手术由同一组外科医生在独立的学术癌症中心(n = 101)或大型多学科学术医疗中心(n = 79)进行。比较了不同医院环境下的患者结局、手术情况及医院成本。癌症中心组患者平均年龄较高(65.2岁对60岁;P = 0.009),平均手术时间较短(12.3小时对13.2小时;P = 0.034)。术后,癌症中心组患者平均ICU住院时间显著缩短(3.45天对4.41天;P < 0.001)。两组在医疗或手术并发症方面无显著差异。多因素分析显示,在癌症中心进行手术是ICU住院时间缩短的唯一显著独立预测因素(系数0.73;P < 0.020)。亚组分析仅纳入上消化道癌症患者,结果显示癌症中心组患者的ICU住院时间进一步缩短(3.85天对5.1天;P < 0.001)。成本分析表明,癌症中心组因ICU住院时间缩短节省了223,816美元。独立的专科癌症中心是进行FTT的安全且合适的环境。我们发现手术时间和ICU住院时间均缩短,这两者都有助于降低总体成本。这些发现挑战了FTT需要大型多学科医院的观念。 4.

相似文献

1
Does a Standalone Cancer Center Improve Head and Neck Microsurgical Outcomes?独立癌症中心能改善头颈显微外科手术的疗效吗?
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017 May;33(4):252-256. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597757. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
2
Cost and clinical outcomes of postoperative intensive care unit versus general floor management in head and neck free flap reconstructive surgery patients.头颈部游离皮瓣重建术后患者在重症监护病房与普通病房管理的成本和临床结局比较。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Sep-Oct;42(5):103029. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103029. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
3
Postoperative medical complications--not microsurgical complications--negatively influence the morbidity, mortality, and true costs after microsurgical reconstruction for head and neck cancer.术后医疗并发症——而非显微手术并发症——对头颈部癌显微外科重建术后的发病率、死亡率及实际费用产生负面影响。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Jun;119(7):2053-2060. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000260591.82762.b5.
4
Value of Intensive Care Unit-Based Postoperative Management for Microvascular Free Flap Reconstruction in Head and Neck Surgery.头颈部手术中基于重症监护病房的术后管理对微血管游离皮瓣重建的价值。
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2021 Jan-Feb;23(1):49-53. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0055. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
5
Vascularized tissue transfer in head and neck surgery: Is intensive care unit-based management necessary?头颈外科中的带血管组织移植:是否有必要在重症监护病房进行管理?
Laryngoscope. 2016 Jan;126(1):73-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.25608. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
6
Head and neck free flap reconstruction in patients older than 80 years.80岁以上患者的头颈部游离皮瓣重建术。
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2014 Oct;30(8):523-30. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1384664. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
7
Application of Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing for Head and Neck Microvascular Free Flap Reconstruction.基于时间驱动的作业成本法在头颈部游离微血管皮瓣重建中的应用。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Jul;171(1):73-80. doi: 10.1002/ohn.739. Epub 2024 Apr 21.
8
Benefits of Immediate Extubation Following Free Tissue Transfer for Head and Neck Reconstruction.游离组织移植用于头颈部重建术后即刻拔管的益处。
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2016 Sep;32(7):533-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1582262. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
9
Systematic review of submental artery island flap versus free flap in head and neck reconstruction.颏下动脉岛状瓣与游离皮瓣在头颈部重建中的系统评价。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Nov-Dec;42(6):103142. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103142. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
10
Does postoperative non-sedation improve outcomes for patients after head and neck cancer reconstruction?: A STROBE compliant study.术后非镇静是否能改善头颈癌重建术后患者的预后?一项遵循STROBE标准的研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Nov 13;99(46):e23147. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023147.

引用本文的文献

1
Free Tissue Transfer Versus Locoregional Flaps for the Reconstruction of Small and Moderate Defects in the Head and Neck Region: A Narrative Review.游离组织移植与局部皮瓣用于头颈部中小面积缺损修复的叙述性综述
Cureus. 2025 May 23;17(5):e84711. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84711. eCollection 2025 May.