Li Lin, Dai Jia-Xi, Xu Le, Huang Zhen-Xia, Pan Qiong, Zhang Xi, Jiang Mei-Yun, Chen Zhao-Hong
Department of Burns, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China.
Fujian Medical University Union Clinical Medical Institute, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China.
Burns. 2017 Jun;43(4):877-885. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.11.003. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
To observe the effect of a rehabilitation intervention on the comprehensive health status of patients with hand burns.
Most studies of hand-burn patients have focused on functional recovery. There have been no studies involving a biological-psychological-social rehabilitation model of hand-burn patients.
A randomized controlled design was used.
Patients with hand burns were recruited to the study, and sixty patients participated. Participants were separated into two groups: (1) The rehabilitation intervention model group (n=30) completed the rehabilitation intervention model, which included the following measures: enhanced social support, intensive health education, comprehensive psychological intervention, and graded exercise. (2) The control group (n=30) completed routine treatment. Intervention lasted 5 weeks. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t test were conducted.
The rehabilitation intervention group had significantly better scores than the control group for comprehensive health, physical function, psychological function, social function, and general health. The differences between the index scores of the two groups were statistically significant.
The rehabilitation intervention improved the comprehensive health status of patients with hand burns and has favorable clinical application.
The comprehensive rehabilitation intervention model used here provides scientific guidance for medical staff aiming to improve the integrated health status of hand-burn patients and accelerate their recovery. What does this paper contribute to the wider global clinical community?
观察康复干预对手部烧伤患者综合健康状况的影响。
大多数关于手部烧伤患者的研究都集中在功能恢复上。尚无涉及手部烧伤患者生物 - 心理 - 社会康复模式的研究。
采用随机对照设计。
招募手部烧伤患者参与研究,共60名患者。参与者被分为两组:(1)康复干预模式组(n = 30)完成康复干预模式,包括以下措施:增强社会支持、强化健康教育、综合心理干预和分级运动。(2)对照组(n = 30)完成常规治疗。干预持续5周。进行方差分析(ANOVA)和学生t检验。
康复干预组在综合健康、身体功能、心理功能、社会功能和总体健康方面的得分显著高于对照组。两组指标得分差异具有统计学意义。
康复干预改善了手部烧伤患者的综合健康状况,具有良好的临床应用价值。
此处使用的综合康复干预模式为旨在改善手部烧伤患者综合健康状况并加速其康复的医务人员提供了科学指导。本文对更广泛的全球临床社区有何贡献?