• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在肠杆菌科中,菌悬液和突变频率对琼脂稀释法和肉汤微量稀释法中磷霉素 MIC 差异的作用。

Role of inoculum and mutant frequency on fosfomycin MIC discrepancies by agar dilution and broth microdilution methods in Enterobacteriaceae.

机构信息

Unidad intercentros de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Microbiología y Medicina Preventiva, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain; Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla IBIS, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.

Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla IBIS, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain; Departmento de Microbiología, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain; Red Española de Investigación en Patología Infecciosa (REIPI), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017 May;23(5):325-331. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.12.022. Epub 2017 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.cmi.2016.12.022
PMID:28062317
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Fosfomycin is re-evaluated as a treatment of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections. However, MIC differences have been described among the different susceptibility testing. The aim was to study the role of the different inoculum size used in agar dilution with respect to broth microdilution, according to CLSI, in the fosfomycin MIC discrepancies.

METHODS

Fosfomycin MICs were determined using agar dilution (reference) and broth microdilution in 220 Escherichia coli (n=81) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=139) clinical isolates. Fosfomycin mutant frequencies were determined in 21 E. coli (MIC=1mg/L) and 21 K. pneumoniae (MIC=16mg/L). The emergence of resistant subpopulations of five E. coli strains (MIC=1mg/L) was monitored over the time by microdilution assay using 0, 4 and 8 mg/L of fosfomycin, and eight different inocula (5×10-3.91×10 CFU/well, 1 : 2 dilutions).

RESULTS

For E. coli, 86.4% of categorical agreement (CA), 9.1% very major errors (VME), 3.3% major errors (ME) and 9.9% minor errors (mE) were found. For K. pneumoniae, CA was 51.1%, VME 15.7%, ME 28.4% and mE 25.2%. Essential agreement (±1-log) was observed in 55.45%. By microdilution, 35.9% of the MICs showed discrepancies of ≥2 dilutions. Initial inoculum used was 5.63 times higher in the microdilution method, in range with CLSI methodology for both techniques. Fosfomycin mutant frequencies were 6.05×10 (4×MIC) to 5.59×10 (256×MIC) for E. coli, and 1.49×10 (4×MIC) to 1.58×10 (16×MIC) for K. pneumoniae. Resistant subpopulations arose mainly after 8 h of incubation with inocula >3.13×10 CFU/well.

CONCLUSIONS

The higher inoculum used in the microdilution method enriched the initial inoculum with resistant subpopulations and could partially explain the fosfomycin MIC discrepancies with respect to the agar dilution method.

摘要

目的

磷霉素作为治疗多重耐药肠杆菌科感染的药物正在重新评估。然而,不同的药敏试验方法已经描述了 MIC 差异。本研究旨在根据 CLSI 标准,研究琼脂稀释法和肉汤微量稀释法中不同接种量对磷霉素 MIC 差异的影响。

方法

采用琼脂稀释法(参考方法)和肉汤微量稀释法测定 220 株大肠埃希菌(n=81)和肺炎克雷伯菌(n=139)临床分离株的磷霉素 MIC。测定 21 株大肠埃希菌(MIC=1mg/L)和 21 株肺炎克雷伯菌(MIC=16mg/L)的磷霉素突变频率。采用微量稀释法,用 0、4 和 8mg/L 的磷霉素,8 个不同的接种量(5×10-3.91×10 CFU/孔,1:2 稀释),监测 5 株大肠埃希菌(MIC=1mg/L)的耐药亚群在时间上的出现情况。

结果

对于大肠埃希菌,分类符合率(CA)为 86.4%,非常大的主要错误(VME)为 9.1%,主要错误(ME)为 3.3%,次要错误(mE)为 9.9%。对于肺炎克雷伯菌,CA 为 51.1%,VME 为 15.7%,ME 为 28.4%,mE 为 25.2%。±1 对数的基本符合率(±1-log)为 55.45%。通过微量稀释法,35.9%的 MIC 差异≥2 个稀释度。微量稀释法中初始接种量比 CLSI 方法高 5.63 倍,两种方法均在范围内。大肠埃希菌的磷霉素突变频率为 6.05×10(4×MIC)至 5.59×10(256×MIC),肺炎克雷伯菌的磷霉素突变频率为 1.49×10(4×MIC)至 1.58×10(16×MIC)。在接种量>3.13×10 CFU/孔的情况下孵育 8 小时后,主要出现耐药亚群。

结论

微量稀释法中使用的较高接种量使初始接种物中富集了耐药亚群,这可能部分解释了与琼脂稀释法相比,磷霉素 MIC 差异的原因。

相似文献

1
Role of inoculum and mutant frequency on fosfomycin MIC discrepancies by agar dilution and broth microdilution methods in Enterobacteriaceae.在肠杆菌科中,菌悬液和突变频率对琼脂稀释法和肉汤微量稀释法中磷霉素 MIC 差异的作用。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017 May;23(5):325-331. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.12.022. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
2
Skipped wells and scientific error during fosfomycin agar dilution and broth microdilution lead to inconsistent minimal inhibitory concentrations and may be cause for reevaluating testing methods for .在磷霉素琼脂稀释法和肉汤微量稀释法过程中出现的跳孔和科学误差会导致最低抑菌浓度不一致,可能需要重新评估测试方法。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Aug 6;12(8):e0420523. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04205-23. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
3
Comparison of in vitro fosfomycin susceptibility testing methods with agar dilution for carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichiacoli.针对耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠埃希菌,体外磷霉素药敏试验方法与琼脂稀释法的比较
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2023 Mar-Apr;42:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2023.01.005. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
4
Comparative evaluation of plazomicin MICs obtained using agar dilution versus broth microdilution methods and impact of inoculum size against ESBL-producing Escherichia coli, carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates.琼脂稀释法与肉汤微量稀释法测定-plazomicin MIC 的比较评估及接种量对产 ESBL 大肠埃希菌、产碳青霉烯酶肺炎克雷伯菌和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌临床分离株的影响。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Nov;95(3):114867. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
5
Fosfomycin efficacy and emergence of resistance among Enterobacteriaceae in an in vitro dynamic bladder infection model.在体外动态膀胱感染模型中观察到肠杆菌科中磷霉素的疗效和耐药性的出现。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Mar 1;73(3):709-719. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx441.
6
Evaluation of colistin stability in agar and comparison of four methods for MIC testing of colistin.评估粘菌素在琼脂中的稳定性,并比较四种粘菌素 MIC 检测方法。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Feb;37(2):345-353. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3140-3. Epub 2017 Nov 25.
7
Susceptibility of ESBL Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae to fosfomycin in the Netherlands and comparison of several testing methods including Etest, MIC test strip, Vitek2, Phoenix and disc diffusion.荷兰产 ESBL 大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌对磷霉素的敏感性及几种检测方法(Etest、MIC 测试条、Vitek2、Phoenix 和纸片扩散法)的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Sep 1;73(9):2380-2387. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky214.
8
Performance of disk diffusion and broth microdilution for fosfomycin susceptibility testing of multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.多药耐药肠杆菌科和铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株中磷霉素药敏试验的药敏纸片扩散法和肉汤微量稀释法的性能。
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020 Jun;21:391-395. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2020.01.003. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
9
Rapid detection of fosfomycin resistance in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. strains isolated from urinary tract infections.从尿路感染分离出的大肠杆菌和克雷伯菌属菌株中磷霉素耐药性的快速检测。
J Microbiol Methods. 2021 Sep;188:106296. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106296. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
10
In vitro activity of fosfomycin against extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: comparison of susceptibility testing procedures.磷霉素对产超广谱β-内酰胺酶大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌的体外活性:药敏试验方法比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Jan;50(1):368-70. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.1.368-370.2006.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of several routine methods for fosfomycin and mecillinam susceptibility testing of Enterobacterales urine isolates.评估几种常规方法在检测肠杆菌科尿液分离株对磷霉素和美西林敏感性中的应用。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024 Oct 1;79(10):2645-2652. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae271.
2
Fosfomycin Uptake in Is Mediated by the Outer-Membrane Porins OmpF, OmpC, and LamB.磷霉素在[具体生物名称未给出]中的摄取由外膜孔蛋白OmpF、OmpC和LamB介导。
ACS Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 12;10(1):127-137. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.3c00367. Epub 2023 Dec 17.
3
Antibacterial mechanism of vanillin against O157: H7.
香草醛对O157:H7的抗菌机制。
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 19;9(9):e19280. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19280. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Performance Evaluation of BD Phoenix and MicroScan WalkAway Plus for Determination of Fosfomycin Susceptibility in .BD Phoenix和MicroScan WalkAway Plus用于测定磷霉素敏感性的性能评估
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Jun 26;12(7):1106. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12071106.
5
Differential Analysis of Three Copper-Based Nanomaterials with Different Morphologies to Suppress and Safety Evaluation.三种不同形貌铜基纳米材料的抑制作用及其安全性评价的差异分析。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jun 2;24(11):9673. doi: 10.3390/ijms24119673.
6
Reliability of E-Tests and the Phoenix Automated Method in Assessing Susceptibility to IV Fosfomycin-Comparative Studies Relative to the Reference Method.E测试和Phoenix自动化方法在评估对静脉注射磷霉素敏感性方面的可靠性——相对于参考方法的比较研究
Pathogens. 2023 May 12;12(5):700. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12050700.
7
What's the Matter with MICs: Bacterial Nutrition, Limiting Resources, and Antibiotic Pharmacodynamics.MIC 怎么了:细菌营养、限制资源和抗生素药效动力学。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0409122. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04091-22. Epub 2023 May 3.
8
Effect of Glycerol on Fosfomycin Activity against .甘油对磷霉素抗……活性的影响
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Nov 12;11(11):1612. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11111612.
9
Oral fosfomycin activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae in a dynamic bladder infection in vitro model.口服磷霉素对体外动态膀胱感染肺炎克雷伯菌的活性。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 Apr 27;77(5):1324-1333. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac045.
10
Effectiveness of Fosfomycin for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli Bacteremic Urinary Tract Infections: A Randomized Clinical Trial.磷霉素治疗多药耐药大肠埃希菌菌血症性尿路感染的有效性:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2137277. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.37277.