Dimitroulas Theodoros, Lambe Tosin, Klocke Rainer, Kitas George D, Duarte Rui V
Department of Rheumatology, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK; Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017 Jun;46(6):687-691. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.12.001. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
Biologic drugs are novel therapeutic agents with demonstrated effectiveness in the management of a variety of chronic inflammatory disorders. Unmet needs in the treatment of chronic pain have led physicians to utilize a similar approach to patients suffering from conditions not characterized by systemic inflammation such as osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this review is to discuss the current knowledge on the use of commonly used biologic agents [i.e., anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF alpha) and anti-nerve growth factor (anti-NGF)] for the management of OA.
A narrative literature review of studies investigating the use of biologic agents for the management of osteoarthritis was conducted. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for English language publications. A hand-search of reference lists of relevant studies was also performed.
Current evidence does not support TNF-alpha inhibition for the management of OA, although a selected subgroup of these patients with a marked inflammatory profile may benefit from this therapy. Anti-NGF therapy has been shown to reduce pain and improve function compared to placebo and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in OA but concerns remain regarding the safety of such treatment. The discrepant results observed in RCTs of biologic agents may be related to heterogeneity, small sample sizes, and differences in the mode of administration of these drugs.
Anti-NGF therapy is efficacious for pain in patients with hip and knee OA. Despite the fact that current data suggests that anti-cytokine treatments have limited efficacy in patients with chronic osteoarthritic pain, larger and better designed studies in more selected populations are justified to determine whether such therapeutic approaches can improve outcomes in this disabling condition where our medical treatment armamentarium is relatively poor.
生物药物是新型治疗药物,已证明在多种慢性炎症性疾病的管理中有效。慢性疼痛治疗中未满足的需求促使医生对患有非全身性炎症疾病(如骨关节炎(OA))的患者采用类似方法。本综述的目的是讨论关于常用生物制剂[即抗肿瘤坏死因子α(抗TNFα)和抗神经生长因子(抗NGF)]用于骨关节炎管理的现有知识。
对研究生物制剂用于骨关节炎管理的研究进行叙述性文献综述。我们在MEDLINE和EMBASE中检索英文出版物。还对手检了相关研究的参考文献列表。
目前的证据不支持使用TNF-α抑制剂来管理骨关节炎,尽管这些患者中选定的具有明显炎症特征的亚组可能从这种治疗中受益。与安慰剂和非甾体类抗炎药相比,抗NGF疗法已显示可减轻骨关节炎患者的疼痛并改善功能,但这种治疗的安全性仍存在担忧。生物制剂随机对照试验中观察到的不一致结果可能与异质性、样本量小以及这些药物给药方式的差异有关。
抗NGF疗法对髋部和膝部骨关节炎患者的疼痛有效。尽管目前的数据表明抗细胞因子治疗对慢性骨关节炎疼痛患者的疗效有限,但在更多选定人群中进行更大规模、设计更好的研究是合理的,以确定这种治疗方法是否能改善这种致残性疾病的治疗效果,在这种疾病中我们的药物治疗手段相对匮乏。