Suppr超能文献

初治转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者中两种含新型雄激素受体轴靶向药物的替代治疗方案疗效的比较评估

Comparative Assessment of Efficacies Between 2 Alternative Therapeutic Sequences With Novel Androgen Receptor-Axis-Targeted Agents in Patients With Chemotherapy-Naïve Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

作者信息

Miyake Hideaki, Hara Takuto, Tamura Keita, Sugiyama Takayuki, Furuse Hiroshi, Ozono Seiichiro, Fujisawa Masato

机构信息

Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan; Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.

Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Aug;15(4):e591-e597. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.12.015. Epub 2016 Dec 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacies of sequential therapies with novel androgen receptor-axis-targeted (ARAT) agents in patients with docetaxel-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included 108 consecutive patients with mCRPC who sequentially received abiraterone acetate (AA) and enzalutamide (Enz), in either order, without prior treatment with docetaxel. The combined prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the sum of PFS1 and PFS2, representing PSA PFSs on the first and second ARAT agents, respectively.

RESULTS

Of these patients, 49 and 59 received ARAT therapy with the AA-to-Enz sequence (AA-to-Enz group) and with the reverse sequence (Enz-to-AA group), respectively. No significant differences in the baseline characteristics were noted between the 2 groups. In the overall patient population, the PSA response rate to the second-line ARAT agent (21.3%) was significantly lower than that of the first-line ARAT agent (58.3%). The combined PSA PFS in the AA-to-Enz group (median, 18.4 months) was significantly superior to that of the Enz-to-AA group (median, 12.8 months). Furthermore, multivariate analysis identified the treatment sequence (ie, AA-to-Enz vs. Enz-to-AA group) in addition to performance status as an independent predictor of combined PSA PFS in these patients. However, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although cross-resistance between ARAT agents is a common phenomenon in docetaxel-naïve patients with mCRPC, different efficacies were observed favoring the AA-to-Enz rather than Enz-to-AA sequence in this series with respect to combined PSA PFS but not OS.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是比较新型雄激素受体轴靶向(ARAT)药物序贯疗法在未接受多西他赛治疗的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者中的疗效。

患者与方法

本研究纳入了108例连续的mCRPC患者,这些患者在未接受多西他赛治疗的情况下,先后接受了醋酸阿比特龙(AA)和恩杂鲁胺(Enz)治疗,顺序不限。联合前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)无进展生存期(PFS)定义为PFS1和PFS2之和,分别代表在第一种和第二种ARAT药物治疗时的PSA无进展生存期。

结果

这些患者中,分别有49例和59例接受了AA至Enz序贯的ARAT治疗(AA至Enz组)和相反序贯的治疗(Enz至AA组)。两组之间的基线特征无显著差异。在总体患者人群中,二线ARAT药物的PSA缓解率(21.3%)显著低于一线ARAT药物(58.3%)。AA至Enz组的联合PSA PFS(中位数为18.4个月)显著优于Enz至AA组(中位数为12.8个月)。此外,多因素分析确定治疗顺序(即AA至Enz组与Enz至AA组)以及体能状态是这些患者联合PSA PFS的独立预测因素。然而,两组之间的总生存期(OS)无显著差异。

结论

虽然在未接受多西他赛治疗的mCRPC患者中,ARAT药物之间的交叉耐药是常见现象,但在本系列研究中,就联合PSA PFS而非OS而言,观察到AA至Enz序贯的疗效优于Enz至AA序贯。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验