Suppr超能文献

在多民族亚洲人群中用于筛查睡眠呼吸障碍的NoSAS评分的验证

Validation of NoSAS score for screening of sleep-disordered breathing in a multiethnic Asian population.

作者信息

Tan Adeline, Hong Yueheng, Tan Linda W L, van Dam Rob M, Cheung Yan Yi, Lee Chi-Hang

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Jurong Health Services, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, 1 Jurong East Street 21, Singapore, 609606, Singapore.

Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Sleep Breath. 2017 Dec;21(4):1033-1038. doi: 10.1007/s11325-016-1455-4. Epub 2017 Jan 7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The NoSAS score was developed to identify subjects at high risk of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). We aimed to validate the NoSAS score in a multiethnic Asian cohort and compare its performance to the STOP-Bang and Berlin questionnaires.

METHODS

A sample of 242 subjects selected from a population-based cohort in Singapore completed home-based sleep testing with an Embletta device (type 3 monitor). All subjects were given the STOP-Bang and Berlin questionnaires for self-administration prior to the sleep study. The NoSAS score was subsequently calculated based on available demographic data and Berlin questionnaire responses.

RESULTS

The prevalence of severe SDB, defined as an apnea-hypopnea index cutoff of ≥30 events/h, was 10.7%. The number of subjects who were classified as high risk by the NoSAS score and STOP-Bang and Berlin questionnaires were 76 (31.4%), 89 (36.8%), and 79 (32.6%), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of the NoSAS score to predict severe SDB were 69.2, 73.1, 95.2, and 23.7%, respectively. The STOP-Bang and Berlin questionnaires performed similarly to the NoSAS score, with area under the curve (AUC) values of all three questionnaires clustered around 0.682-0.748. Compared to the STOP-Bang (94.8%) and Berlin questionnaires (96.3%), the NoSAS score (95.2%) had equally high negative predictive value in ruling out severe SDB.

CONCLUSIONS

The NoSAS score performed similarly to the STOP-Bang and Berlin questionnaires in a multiethnic Asian cohort. All three questionnaires had high negative predictive values in ruling out severe SDB and may have utility as screening tools.

摘要

目的

开发NoSAS评分以识别睡眠呼吸障碍(SDB)高危人群。我们旨在在一个多民族亚洲队列中验证NoSAS评分,并将其性能与STOP-Bang问卷和柏林问卷进行比较。

方法

从新加坡一个基于人群的队列中选取242名受试者,使用Embletta设备(3型监测仪)完成家庭睡眠测试。在睡眠研究之前,所有受试者都被给予STOP-Bang问卷和柏林问卷进行自我填写。随后根据可用的人口统计学数据和柏林问卷的回答计算NoSAS评分。

结果

严重SDB的患病率,定义为呼吸暂停低通气指数截断值≥30次/小时,为10.7%。被NoSAS评分、STOP-Bang问卷和柏林问卷分类为高危的受试者人数分别为76人(31.4%)、89人(36.8%)和79人(32.6%)。NoSAS评分预测严重SDB的敏感性、特异性、阴性和阳性预测值分别为69.2%、73.1%、95.2%和23.7%。STOP-Bang问卷和柏林问卷的表现与NoSAS评分相似,所有三份问卷的曲线下面积(AUC)值集中在0.682 - 0.748左右。与STOP-Bang问卷(94.8%)和柏林问卷(96.3%)相比,NoSAS评分(95.2%)在排除严重SDB方面具有同样高的阴性预测值。

结论

在一个多民族亚洲队列中,NoSAS评分的表现与STOP-Bang问卷和柏林问卷相似。所有三份问卷在排除严重SDB方面都具有高阴性预测值,可能作为筛查工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验