Ormel J, Oerlemans A M, Raven D, Laceulle O M, Hartman C A, Veenstra R, Verhulst F C, Vollebergh W, Rosmalen J G M, Reijneveld S A, Oldehinkel A J
Department of Psychiatry,University of Groningen,University Medical Center Groningen,Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation (ICPE),Groningen,The Netherlands.
Department of Sociology,University of Groningen,Groningen,The Netherlands.
Psychol Med. 2017 May;47(7):1271-1282. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716003445. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
Various sources indicate that mental disorders are the leading contributor to the burden of disease among youth. An important determinant of functioning is current mental health status. This study investigated whether psychiatric history has additional predictive power when predicting individual differences in functional outcomes.
We used data from the Dutch TRAILS study in which 1778 youths were followed from pre-adolescence into young adulthood (retention 80%). Of those, 1584 youths were successfully interviewed, at age 19, using the World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 3.0) to assess current and past CIDI-DSM-IV mental disorders. Four outcome domains were assessed at the same time: economic (e.g. academic achievement, social benefits, financial difficulties), social (early motherhood, interpersonal conflicts, antisocial behavior), psychological (e.g. suicidality, subjective well-being, loneliness), and health behavior (e.g. smoking, problematic alcohol, cannabis use).
Out of the 19 outcomes, 14 were predicted by both current and past disorders, three only by past disorders (receiving social benefits, psychiatric hospitalization, adolescent motherhood), and two only by current disorder (absenteeism, obesity). Which type of disorders was most important depended on the outcome. Adjusted for current disorder, past internalizing disorders predicted in particular psychological outcomes while externalizing disorders predicted in particular health behavior outcomes. Economic and social outcomes were predicted by a history of co-morbidity of internalizing and externalizing disorder. The risk of problematic cannabis use and alcohol consumption dropped with a history of internalizing disorder.
To understand current functioning, it is necessary to examine both current and past psychiatric status.
各种资料表明,精神障碍是青少年疾病负担的主要因素。功能状况的一个重要决定因素是当前的心理健康状况。本研究调查了在预测功能结局的个体差异时,精神病史是否具有额外的预测能力。
我们使用了荷兰TRAILS研究的数据,该研究对1778名青少年从青春期前追踪至青年期(保留率80%)。其中,1584名青少年在19岁时接受了成功访谈,使用世界卫生组织综合国际诊断访谈(CIDI 3.0)评估当前和过去的CIDI-DSM-IV精神障碍。同时评估了四个结局领域:经济(如学业成绩、社会福利、经济困难)、社会(早育、人际冲突、反社会行为)、心理(如自杀倾向、主观幸福感、孤独感)和健康行为(如吸烟、问题饮酒、大麻使用)。
在19项结局中,14项由当前和过去的障碍共同预测,3项仅由过去的障碍预测(接受社会福利、精神病住院治疗、青少年母亲身份),2项仅由当前的障碍预测(旷工、肥胖)。哪种类型的障碍最重要取决于结局。在调整了当前障碍后,过去的内化障碍尤其能预测心理结局,而外化障碍尤其能预测健康行为结局。经济和社会结局由内化和外化障碍共病史预测。有内化障碍史的人,使用大麻和饮酒出现问题的风险会降低。
为了解当前的功能状况,有必要同时检查当前和过去的精神状态。