Suppr超能文献

测试START分诊协议:它能否提高非医疗人员在灾难和大规模伤亡事件中更好地对患者进行分诊的能力?

Testing the START Triage Protocol: Can It Improve the Ability of Nonmedical Personnel to Better Triage Patients During Disasters and Mass Casualties Incidents ?

作者信息

Badiali Stefano, Giugni Aimone, Marcis Lucia

机构信息

1Bologna NHS Emergency Department,Bologna,Italy.

2Italian Red Cross Bologna Committee - Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute of Bologna,Bologna,Italy.

出版信息

Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2017 Jun;11(3):305-309. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2016.151. Epub 2017 Jan 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

START (Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment) triage is a tool that is available even to nonmedical rescue personnel in case of a disaster or mass casualty incident (MCI). In Italy, no data are available on whether application of the START protocol could improve patient outcomes during a disaster or MCI. We aimed to address whether "last-minute" START training of nonmedical personnel during a disaster or MCI would result in more effective triage of patients.

METHODS

In this case-control study, 400 nonmedical ambulance crew members were randomly assigned to a non-START or a START group (200 per group). The START group received last-minute START training. Each group examined 6000 patients, obtained from the Emergo Train System (ETS Italy, Bologna, Italy) victims database, and assigned patients a triage code (black-red-yellow-green) along with a reason for the assignment. Each rescuer triaged 30 patients within a 30-minute time frame. Results were analyzed according to Fisher's exact test for a P value<0.01. Under- and over-triage ratios were analyzed as well.

RESULTS

The START group completed the evaluations in 15 minutes, whereas the non-START group took 30 minutes. The START group correctly triaged 94.2% of their patients, as opposed to 59.83% of the non-START group (P<0.01). Under- and over-triage were, respectively, 2.73% and 3.08% for the START group versus 13.67% and 26.5% for the non-START group. The non-START group had 458 "preventable deaths" on 6000 cases because of incorrect triage, whereas the START group had 91.

CONCLUSIONS

Even a "last-minute" training on the START triage protocol allows nonmedical personnel to better identify and triage the victims of a disaster or MCI, resulting in more effective and efficient medical intervention. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2017;11:305-309).

摘要

目的

START(简单分诊与快速治疗)分诊是一种即使在灾难或大规模伤亡事件(MCI)中,非医疗救援人员也可使用的工具。在意大利,尚无关于应用START方案是否能在灾难或MCI期间改善患者预后的数据。我们旨在探讨在灾难或MCI期间对非医疗人员进行“最后一刻”的START培训是否会使患者分诊更有效。

方法

在这项病例对照研究中,400名非医疗救护人员被随机分为非START组或START组(每组200人)。START组接受了最后一刻的START培训。每组检查从Emergo Train System(意大利博洛尼亚的ETS Italy)受害者数据库中获取的6000名患者,并为患者分配一个分诊代码(黑色-红色-黄色-绿色)以及分配的理由。每位救援人员在30分钟的时间内对30名患者进行分诊。根据Fisher精确检验分析结果,P值<0.01。还分析了分诊不足和过度分诊的比例。

结果

START组在15分钟内完成评估,而非START组则用时30分钟。START组正确分诊了94.2%的患者,而非START组为59.83%(P<0.01)。START组的分诊不足和过度分诊分别为2.73%和3.08%,而非START组分别为13.67%和26.5%。非START组在6000例病例中有458例因分诊错误导致“可预防死亡”,而START组为91例。

结论

即使是对START分诊方案进行“最后一刻”培训,也能使非医疗人员更好地识别和分诊灾难或MCI的受害者,从而实现更有效和高效的医疗干预。(《灾难医学与公共卫生防范》。2017;11:305 - 309)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验