• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种转化分诊研究开发工具:标准化大规模伤亡事件中的院前分诊决策系统。

A translational triage research development tool: standardizing prehospital triage decision-making systems in mass casualty incidents.

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Gothenburg Emergency Medicine Research Group (GEMREG), Sahlgrenska Academy, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Aug 17;29(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00932-z.

DOI:10.1186/s13049-021-00932-z
PMID:34404443
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8369703/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is no global consensus on the use of prehospital triage system in mass casualty incidents. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the most commonly used pre-existing prehospital triage systems for the possibility of creating one universal translational triage tool.

METHODS

The Rapid Evidence Review consisted of (1) a systematic literature review (2) merging and content analysis of the studies focusing on similarities and differences between systems and (3) development of a universal system.

RESULTS

There were 17 triage systems described in 31 eligible articles out of 797 identified initially. Seven of the systems met the predesignated criteria and were selected for further analysis. The criteria from the final seven systems were compiled, translated and counted for in means of 1/7's. As a product, a universal system was created of the majority criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

This study does not create a new triage system itself but rather identifies the possibility to convert various prehospital triage systems into one by using a triage translational tool. Future research should examine the tool and its different decision-making steps either by using simulations or by experts' evaluation to ensure its feasibility in terms of speed, continuity, simplicity, sensitivity and specificity, before final evaluation at prehospital level.

摘要

背景

全球范围内对于在大规模伤亡事件中使用院前分诊系统尚无共识。本研究旨在评估目前最常用的、预先存在的院前分诊系统,以探索是否有可能创建一个通用的翻译分诊工具。

方法

快速证据审查包括:(1)系统文献综述;(2)合并和分析重点关注系统异同的研究;(3)开发通用系统。

结果

最初从 797 篇文章中确定了 31 篇符合条件的文章,描述了 17 种分诊系统。其中 7 个系统符合预定标准,被选作进一步分析。从最终的 7 个系统中汇总、翻译并计算了所有标准的平均值。最终创建了一个使用分诊翻译工具将各种院前分诊系统转换为一个系统的通用系统。

结论

本研究本身并未创建新的分诊系统,而是确定了使用分诊翻译工具将各种院前分诊系统转换为一个系统的可能性。未来的研究应该通过模拟或专家评估来检验该工具及其不同的决策步骤,以确保其在速度、连续性、简单性、敏感性和特异性方面的可行性,然后再在院前水平进行最终评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fdd/8369703/07115cce2788/13049_2021_932_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fdd/8369703/9032072dcb53/13049_2021_932_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fdd/8369703/7a56853b16e7/13049_2021_932_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fdd/8369703/2ab733a133cb/13049_2021_932_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fdd/8369703/07115cce2788/13049_2021_932_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fdd/8369703/9032072dcb53/13049_2021_932_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fdd/8369703/7a56853b16e7/13049_2021_932_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fdd/8369703/2ab733a133cb/13049_2021_932_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fdd/8369703/07115cce2788/13049_2021_932_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A translational triage research development tool: standardizing prehospital triage decision-making systems in mass casualty incidents.一种转化分诊研究开发工具:标准化大规模伤亡事件中的院前分诊决策系统。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Aug 17;29(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00932-z.
2
Developing a translational triage research tool: part two-evaluating the tool through a Delphi study among experts.开发一种转化性分诊研究工具:第二部分——通过专家德尔菲研究对工具进行评估。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022 Jul 30;30(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13049-022-01035-z.
3
Prehospital Triage by Lay Person First Responders: A Scoping Review and Proposal for a new Prehospital Triage Tool.非专业急救人员的院前分诊:一项范围综述及新的院前分诊工具提案
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Jun;16(3):1242-1252. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2021.19. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
4
-PLUS prehospital mass-casualty triage: a strategy for addressing unusual injury mechanisms.- 现场大批伤员分类:应对不常见致伤机制的策略。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010 May-Jun;25(3):227-36. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00008086.
5
A consensus-based gold standard for the evaluation of mass casualty triage systems.一种基于共识的大规模伤亡分诊系统评估的金标准。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015 Apr-Jun;19(2):267-71. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2014.959222. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
6
Sudden-Onset Disaster Mass-Casualty Incident Response: A Modified Delphi Study on Triage, Prehospital Life Support, and Processes.突发灾害大规模伤亡事件应对:分诊、院外生命支持和流程的改良德尔菲研究
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2023 Oct;38(5):570-580. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X23006337. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
7
Accuracy of prehospital triage systems for mass casualty incidents in trauma register studies - A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.创伤登记研究中创伤患者群体伤现场分诊系统的准确性:诊断准确性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Injury. 2022 Aug;53(8):2725-2733. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.05.006. Epub 2022 May 19.
8
Prehospital Disaster Triage Does Not Predict Pediatric Outcomes: Comparing the Criteria Outcomes Tool to Three Mass-Casualty Incident Triage Algorithms.院前灾难分诊不能预测儿科结局:比较标准结局工具与三种大规模伤亡事件分诊算法。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021 Oct;36(5):503-510. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X21000856. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
9
Prehospital triage for mass casualty incidents using the META method for early surgical assessment: retrospective validation of a hospital trauma registry.运用 META 方法对大量伤员事件进行院前分诊用于早期外科评估:医院创伤登记处的回顾性验证。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr;46(2):425-433. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1040-6. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
10
Prehospital Response Time of the Emergency Medical Service during Mass Casualty Incidents and the Effect of Triage: A Retrospective Study.突发事件中紧急医疗服务的院前反应时间和分诊的效果:一项回顾性研究。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Jun;16(3):1091-1098. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2021.40. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Teaching triage in disaster medicine - same subject, but different approach.灾难医学中的分诊教学——主题相同,但方法不同。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Jan 16;33(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01322-5.
2
Integrating GPT-Based AI into Virtual Patients to Facilitate Communication Training Among Medical First Responders: Usability Study of Mixed Reality Simulation.将基于GPT的人工智能集成到虚拟患者中以促进医疗急救人员的沟通培训:混合现实模拟的可用性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 11;8:e58623. doi: 10.2196/58623.
3
The implication of a translational triage tool in mass casualty incidents: part three: a multinational study, using validated patient cards.

本文引用的文献

1
Triage.分诊。
Crit Care Clin. 2019 Oct;35(4):575-589. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
2
Triage Performance of School Personnel Using the SALT System.使用 SALT 系统对学校人员进行分诊表现评估。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019 Aug;34(4):401-406. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X1900462X.
3
Comparing the Accuracy of Mass Casualty Triage Systems When Used in an Adult Population.比较成人人群中使用的批量伤患检伤分类系统的准确性。
用于大规模伤亡事件的翻译分诊工具的意义:第三部分:使用经过验证的患者卡片的多国研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Nov 28;31(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01128-3.
4
Development of an Anticipatory Triage-Ranking Algorithm Using Dynamic Simulation of the Expected Time Course of Patients With Trauma: Modeling and Simulation Study.基于创伤患者预期时间进程动态模拟的前瞻性分诊排序算法的开发:建模与仿真研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 15;25:e44042. doi: 10.2196/44042.
5
Advancing the scientific study of prehospital mass casualty response through a Translational Science process: the T1 scoping literature review stage.通过转化科学流程推进院前大批量伤患应对的科学研究:T1 范围文献综述阶段。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Aug;49(4):1647-1660. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02266-0. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
6
Education, training and technological innovation, key components of the ESTES-NIGHTINGALE project cooperation for Mass Casualty Incident preparedness in Europe.教育、培训和技术创新是 ESTES-NIGHTINGALE 项目合作应对欧洲大规模伤亡事件准备的关键组成部分。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Apr;49(2):653-659. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02198-1. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
7
Developing a translational triage research tool: part two-evaluating the tool through a Delphi study among experts.开发一种转化性分诊研究工具:第二部分——通过专家德尔菲研究对工具进行评估。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022 Jul 30;30(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13049-022-01035-z.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020 Jul-Aug;24(4):515-524. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1641579. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
4
Staff perspectives of a model of access and triage for reducing waiting time in ambulatory services: a qualitative study.员工对减少门诊服务等待时间的接入与分诊模式的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 May 3;19(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4123-0.
5
Immediate response to major incidents: defining an immediate responder!突发事件的即时响应:定义即时响应者!
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Dec;46(6):1309-1320. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01133-1. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
6
Triage Systems in Mass Casualty Incidents and Disasters: A Review Study with A Worldwide Approach.大规模伤亡事件和灾难中的分诊系统:一项全球视角的综述研究
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Feb 12;7(3):482-494. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.119. eCollection 2019 Feb 15.
7
Facilitators and constrainers of civilian-military collaboration: the Swedish perspectives.军民合作的促进因素和制约因素:瑞典的观点。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Jun;46(3):649-656. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1058-9. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
8
Comparative study of a simulated incident with multiple victims and immersive virtual reality.多受害者模拟事件与沉浸式虚拟现实的对比研究
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Dec;71:48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
9
Intuitive versus Algorithmic Triage.直观分诊与算法分诊
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Aug;33(4):355-361. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X18000626.
10
Comparison of the Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment system versus the Prehospital Advanced Triage Model in multiple-casualty events.多发伤事件中简易分类与快速治疗系统与院前高级分类模型的比较。
Emergencias. 2018;30(4):224-230.