Jalal Zakaria, Dinet Marie-Lou, Combes Nicolas, Pillois Xavier, Renou Pauline, Sibon Igor, Iriart Xavier, Thambo Jean-Benoît
Department of paediatric and adult congenital cardiology, university hospital of Bordeaux, avenue Magellan, 33600 Pessac, France.
Department of paediatric and adult congenital cardiology, university hospital of Bordeaux, avenue Magellan, 33600 Pessac, France.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Apr;110(4):242-249. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2016.09.006. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
After left atrial appendage closure (LAAC), various antithrombotic protocols have been suggested, but the optimal post-procedural antithrombotic strategy is still under debate.
To investigate the efficacy and safety of LAAC with an AMPLATZER™ Cardiac Plug (ACP) device (St. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN, USA) followed by single antiplatelet therapy.
Consecutive patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and a contraindication for oral anticoagulants who underwent LAAC with an ACP device between 2012 and 2014 in two French centres were included. Follow-up included clinical evaluation at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, and yearly thereafter, and a cardiac computed tomography scan at 3 months to assess device position, device-related thrombus and residual leak. Single antiplatelet therapy was prescribed after the procedure for at least 12 months.
A total of 76 patients underwent successful LAAC (mean age: 73 years; 59% men; mean CHADS-VASc score 4.4±1.3; mean HAS-BLED score 3.4±0.9). Three major complications occurred during the periprocedural period (one cardiac tamponade and two access site haematomas). Device thrombosis was observed at 3 months in five (6.8%) patients who remained asymptomatic. After a mean follow-up of 13 months, the rates of death, stroke and major bleeding were 2.6%, 4.0% and 1.3%, respectively. Embolic and bleeding events were less frequent than expected from CHADS-VASc (4.0% vs 9.9%; P<0.001) and HAS-BLED (1.3% vs 4.3%; P<0.001) risk scores.
LAAC using an ACP device followed by single antiplatelet therapy could be a reasonable alternative for stroke prevention.
左心耳封堵术(LAAC)后,人们提出了各种抗血栓形成方案,但术后最佳抗血栓形成策略仍存在争议。
探讨使用AMPLATZER™心脏封堵器(ACP)(美国明尼阿波利斯市圣犹达医疗公司)进行LAAC并采用单一抗血小板治疗的有效性和安全性。
纳入2012年至2014年在法国两个中心接受使用ACP装置进行LAAC的连续非瓣膜性心房颤动患者,这些患者有口服抗凝剂的禁忌证。随访包括在1、3、6和12个月时以及此后每年进行临床评估,并在3个月时进行心脏计算机断层扫描以评估装置位置、与装置相关的血栓和残余渗漏。术后至少12个月给予单一抗血小板治疗。
共有76例患者成功进行了LAAC(平均年龄:73岁;59%为男性;平均CHADS-VASc评分为4.4±1.3;平均HAS-BLED评分为3.4±0.9)。围手术期发生了3例主要并发症(1例心脏压塞和2例穿刺部位血肿)。5例(6.8%)患者在3个月时观察到装置血栓形成,这些患者无症状。平均随访13个月后,死亡率、中风率和大出血率分别为2.6%、4.0%和1.3%。栓塞和出血事件的发生率低于CHADS-VASc风险评分(4.0%对9.9%;P<0.001)和HAS-BLED风险评分(1.3%对4.3%;P<0.001)预期的发生率。
使用ACP装置进行LAAC并采用单一抗血小板治疗可能是预防中风的合理替代方案。