• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

服用低剂量达比加群酯与华法林进行短期抗凝治疗后行 Watchman 左心耳封堵术的患者发生器械相关血栓的风险。

Risk of device-related thrombosis following short-term oral anticoagulation with low-dose dabigatran versus warfarin after Watchman left atrial appendage occlusion.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, 71140Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Department of Pharmacy, Ren Ji Hospital, 71140Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Sci Prog. 2022 Jul-Sep;105(3):368504221113194. doi: 10.1177/00368504221113194.

DOI:10.1177/00368504221113194
PMID:35849447
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10450492/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) provides an alternative for poor candidates for long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC). To prevent device-related thrombosis (DRT), OAC should be continued for the first 45 days to allow complete endothelialization post-LAAO implantation. Whereas, evidence is limited on the feasibility and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) used after LAAO.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational single-center study of AF patients undergoing LAAO with a Watchman device and receiving either low-dose dabigatran (110mg twice daily) or warfarin in the peri- and post-procedural period for 45 days. Transesophageal echocardiography was scheduled to perform at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after the procedure to assess the stability of the device and to detect DRT. Incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events were also evaluated during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

There were a total of 84 patients who successfully underwent Watchman implantation, with 38 patients (45.2%) receiving low-dose dabigatran and 46 patients (54.8%) using warfarin post-LAAO. Peri-procedural complications occurred in 10 patients, with 3 patients in the dabigatran group and 7 patients in the warfarin group (7.9% vs. 15.2%,  = 0.30). During the 12-month follow-up, 1 patient experienced major bleeding and 16 patients suffered minor bleeding in the warfarin group, while 5 patients treated with dabigatran had minor bleeding (34.8% vs. 13.2%,  = 0.02). Besides, 6 DRT (15.8%) were detected in dabigatran groups, and the incidence was higher than in the warfarin group (15.8% vs. 2.2%,  = 0.03). No DRT-related ischemic events were found.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that short-term low-dose dabigatran (110 mg twice daily) could significantly decrease the risk of bleeding compared with warfarin at the expense of increased risk of DRT post-LAAO. Therefore, low-dose dabigatran should be used with caution for post-implant anticoagulation of LAAO. Further studies are urgently needed on the feasibility and safety of DOACs post-LAAO.

摘要

背景

经皮左心耳封堵术(LAAO)为长期口服抗凝治疗(OAC)禁忌的患者提供了一种替代方法。为了预防器械相关血栓形成(DRT),LAAO 后应继续 OAC 治疗 45 天,以允许 LAAO 植入后完全内皮化。然而,关于 LAAO 后使用直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)的可行性和安全性的证据有限。

方法

这是一项回顾性观察性单中心研究,纳入了接受 Watchman 装置行 LAAO 的 AF 患者,并在围手术期和术后 45 天内分别接受低剂量达比加群(110mg,每日 2 次)或华法林治疗。术后 6 周、6 个月和 12 个月行经食管超声心动图检查,以评估器械稳定性和检测 DRT。在随访期间还评估了血栓栓塞和出血事件的发生率。

结果

共有 84 例患者成功接受 Watchman 植入术,其中 38 例(45.2%)患者术后接受低剂量达比加群治疗,46 例(54.8%)患者接受华法林治疗。围手术期并发症发生于 10 例患者,达比加群组 3 例,华法林组 7 例(7.9%比 15.2%, = 0.30)。在 12 个月的随访期间,华法林组有 1 例患者发生大出血,16 例患者发生小出血,而达比加群组有 5 例患者发生小出血(34.8%比 13.2%, = 0.02)。此外,达比加群组有 6 例 DRT(15.8%),高于华法林组(15.8%比 2.2%, = 0.03)。未发现与 DRT 相关的缺血事件。

结论

本研究表明,与华法林相比,LAAO 术后短期应用低剂量达比加群(110mg,每日 2 次)可显著降低出血风险,但会增加 DRT 风险。因此,LAAO 后应用达比加群应谨慎。迫切需要进一步研究 LAAO 后 DOACs 的可行性和安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2471/10450492/4f43130b90cc/10.1177_00368504221113194-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2471/10450492/4d36fababc36/10.1177_00368504221113194-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2471/10450492/4f43130b90cc/10.1177_00368504221113194-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2471/10450492/4d36fababc36/10.1177_00368504221113194-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2471/10450492/4f43130b90cc/10.1177_00368504221113194-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk of device-related thrombosis following short-term oral anticoagulation with low-dose dabigatran versus warfarin after Watchman left atrial appendage occlusion.服用低剂量达比加群酯与华法林进行短期抗凝治疗后行 Watchman 左心耳封堵术的患者发生器械相关血栓的风险。
Sci Prog. 2022 Jul-Sep;105(3):368504221113194. doi: 10.1177/00368504221113194.
2
Safety and efficacy of low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin after left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device.经 Watchman 装置行左心耳封堵术后应用低剂量非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂与华法林的安全性和有效性。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2022 Aug;121(8):1488-1494. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2021.10.015. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
3
Propensity-Matched Comparison of Oral Anticoagulation Versus Antiplatelet Therapy After Left Atrial Appendage Closure With WATCHMAN.经 WATCHMAN 左心耳封堵术后口服抗凝与抗血小板治疗的倾向性匹配比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun 10;12(11):1055-1063. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.004.
4
Effectiveness and safety of short-term anticoagulant regimens after left atrial appendage occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮左心耳封堵术后短期抗凝方案的有效性和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Thromb Res. 2024 Jan;233:88-98. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2023.10.021. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
5
Initial anticoagulation experience with standard-dose rivaroxaban after Watchman left atrial appendage occlusion.在植入Watchman左心耳封堵器后使用标准剂量利伐沙班的初始抗凝经验。
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Feb;8(4):105. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.116.
6
Use of non-warfarin oral anticoagulants instead of warfarin during left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device.在使用Watchman装置进行左心耳封堵时,使用非华法林口服抗凝剂替代华法林。
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Jan;14(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.10.020. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
7
Patient-Level Analysis of Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Practice Versus Clinical Trials.基于实践与临床试验的 Watchman 左心耳封堵患者水平分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 May 9;15(9):950-961. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.02.029.
8
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Versus Oral Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation : A Decision Analysis.左心耳封堵与房颤抗凝治疗:决策分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Sep;175(9):1230-1239. doi: 10.7326/M21-4653. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
9
DAPT Is Comparable to OAC Following LAAC With WATCHMAN FLX: A National Registry Analysis.经左心耳封堵术(LAAC)联合 WATCHMAN FLX 后,DAPT 与 OAC 相当:一项全国登记研究分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Nov 27;16(22):2708-2718. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.08.013. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
10
Direct Oral Anticoagulant Versus Warfarin After Left Atrial Appendage Closure With WATCHMAN: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.左心耳封堵术后直接口服抗凝药与华法林的比较:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022 Nov;47(11):101335. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101335. Epub 2022 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal duration of anticoagulation after left atrial appendage closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.左心耳封堵术后抗凝的最佳持续时间:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Apr 22;25(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04736-2.
2
Comparison of outcomes between novel oral anticoagulants and warfarin monotherapy in patients with left atrial appendage closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.左心耳封堵患者新型口服抗凝药与华法林单药治疗的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 24;9:1023941. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1023941. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Antithrombotic Therapy After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.房颤患者左心耳封堵术后的抗血栓治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 10;79(18):1785-1798. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.02.047.
2
Low Dose of Direct Oral Anticoagulants after Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.左心耳封堵术后低剂量直接口服抗凝剂
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2021 Oct 28;8(11):142. doi: 10.3390/jcdd8110142.
3
Half-Dose Direct Oral Anticoagulation Versus Standard Antithrombotic Therapy After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.
左心耳封堵术后半剂量直接口服抗凝与标准抗血栓治疗的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 8;14(21):2353-2364. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.07.031. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
4
Incidence of Device-Related Thrombosis in Watchman Patients Undergoing a Genotype-Guided Antithrombotic Strategy.基于基因型指导的抗栓策略的 Watchman 患者装置相关血栓发生率。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Dec;7(12):1533-1543. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.04.012. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
5
Pulmonary ridge coverage and device-related thrombosis after left atrial appendage occlusion.左心耳封堵术后肺嵴覆盖和器械相关血栓形成。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Feb 5;16(15):e1288-e1294. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00886.
6
Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial to compare two antithrombotic strategies after left atrial appendage occlusion: double antiplatelet therapy vs. apixaban (ADALA study).一项比较左心耳封堵术后两种抗栓策略的随机临床试验的原理与设计:双联抗血小板治疗与阿哌沙班(ADALA研究)
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020 Nov;59(2):471-477. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00884-x. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
7
Left atrial appendage thrombus formation in a patient with atrial fibrillation on dabigatran therapy associated with CES1 and ABCB1 genetic polymorphisms: A case report.达比加群治疗的房颤患者左心耳血栓形成与CES1和ABCB1基因多态性相关:一例报告
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 4;99(36):e22084. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022084.
8
Reduced Rivaroxaban Dose Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: ADRIFT a Randomized Pilot Study.左心耳封堵术后利伐沙班剂量降低与双联抗血小板治疗对比:ADRIFT一项随机试验性研究
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul;13(7):e008481. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008481. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
9
Initial anticoagulation experience with standard-dose rivaroxaban after Watchman left atrial appendage occlusion.在植入Watchman左心耳封堵器后使用标准剂量利伐沙班的初始抗凝经验。
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Feb;8(4):105. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.116.
10
EHRA/EAPCI expert consensus statement on catheter-based left atrial appendage occlusion - an update.EHRA/EAPCI关于基于导管的左心耳封堵术的专家共识声明——更新版
EuroIntervention. 2020 Jan 17;15(13):1133-1180. doi: 10.4244/EIJY19M08_01.