Upadhyay Ashish, Jaber Bertrand L
Section of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Semin Dial. 2017 Mar;30(2):121-124. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12574. Epub 2017 Jan 8.
The practice of reprocessing dialyzers for reuse, once predominant in the United States, has been steadily declining over the last 20 years. The professed roles of reuse in improving dialyzer membrane biocompatibility and lowering the risk of first-use syndrome have lost relevance with the advent of biocompatible dialyzer membranes and favorable sterilization techniques. The potential for cost-savings from reuse is also called into question by the easy availability of comparatively cheaper dialyzers and rising regulatory demands and operational cost of reprocessing systems. While the environmental concerns from additional dialyzer-related solid waste from rising single-use practice remains pertinent and requires development of safer dialyzer disposable system technologies, there is no meaningful medical rationale for the continued practice of dialyzer reuse in the twenty-first century.
在美国,曾经占主导地位的透析器再处理以供重复使用的做法,在过去20年里一直在稳步下降。随着生物相容性透析器膜的出现和良好的灭菌技术,重复使用在改善透析器膜生物相容性和降低首次使用综合征风险方面所宣称的作用已失去相关性。相对便宜的透析器容易获得,以及再处理系统不断增加的监管要求和运营成本,也使重复使用节省成本的可能性受到质疑。虽然一次性使用增加导致与透析器相关的额外固体废物带来的环境问题仍然存在,需要开发更安全的透析器一次性系统技术,但在21世纪,继续进行透析器重复使用已没有任何有意义的医学依据。