• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血液透析膜的再利用与生物相容性:与临床相关吗?

Reuse and Biocompatibility of Hemodialysis Membranes: Clinically Relevant?

作者信息

Upadhyay Ashish, Jaber Bertrand L

机构信息

Section of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Semin Dial. 2017 Mar;30(2):121-124. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12574. Epub 2017 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1111/sdi.12574
PMID:28066932
Abstract

The practice of reprocessing dialyzers for reuse, once predominant in the United States, has been steadily declining over the last 20 years. The professed roles of reuse in improving dialyzer membrane biocompatibility and lowering the risk of first-use syndrome have lost relevance with the advent of biocompatible dialyzer membranes and favorable sterilization techniques. The potential for cost-savings from reuse is also called into question by the easy availability of comparatively cheaper dialyzers and rising regulatory demands and operational cost of reprocessing systems. While the environmental concerns from additional dialyzer-related solid waste from rising single-use practice remains pertinent and requires development of safer dialyzer disposable system technologies, there is no meaningful medical rationale for the continued practice of dialyzer reuse in the twenty-first century.

摘要

在美国,曾经占主导地位的透析器再处理以供重复使用的做法,在过去20年里一直在稳步下降。随着生物相容性透析器膜的出现和良好的灭菌技术,重复使用在改善透析器膜生物相容性和降低首次使用综合征风险方面所宣称的作用已失去相关性。相对便宜的透析器容易获得,以及再处理系统不断增加的监管要求和运营成本,也使重复使用节省成本的可能性受到质疑。虽然一次性使用增加导致与透析器相关的额外固体废物带来的环境问题仍然存在,需要开发更安全的透析器一次性系统技术,但在21世纪,继续进行透析器重复使用已没有任何有意义的医学依据。

相似文献

1
Reuse and Biocompatibility of Hemodialysis Membranes: Clinically Relevant?血液透析膜的再利用与生物相容性:与临床相关吗?
Semin Dial. 2017 Mar;30(2):121-124. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12574. Epub 2017 Jan 8.
2
Effect of dialyzer reuse on survival of patients treated with hemodialysis.透析器复用对接受血液透析治疗患者生存率的影响。
JAMA. 1996 Aug 28;276(8):620-5.
3
Single-use versus reusable dialyzers: the known unknowns.一次性透析器与可重复使用透析器:已知的未知因素。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Sep;2(5):1079-86. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01040207. Epub 2007 Aug 16.
4
Dialyzer reuse and patient outcomes: what do we know now?透析器复用与患者预后:我们目前了解多少?
Semin Dial. 2005 May-Jun;18(3):175-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2005.18303.x.
5
Dialyzer reuse: justified cost saving for south Asian region.透析器复用:南亚地区合理的成本节约措施
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014 Aug;24(8):591-6.
6
National Kidney Foundation report on dialyzer reuse. Task Force on Reuse of Dialyzers, Council on Dialysis, National Kidney Foundation.美国国家肾脏基金会关于透析器复用的报告。透析器复用特别工作组,透析委员会,美国国家肾脏基金会。
Am J Kidney Dis. 1997 Dec;30(6):859-71. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(97)90096-2.
7
Dialyzer reuse--part II: advantages and disadvantages.透析器复用——第二部分:优点与缺点
Semin Dial. 2006 May-Jun;19(3):217-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2006.00158.x.
8
Hemodialyzer Reuse and Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections.血液透析器复用与革兰氏阴性菌血流感染
Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 Jun;69(6):726-733. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.09.022. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
9
The economics of dialyzer reuse in ESRD.终末期肾病中透析器复用的经济学
Nephrol News Issues. 2002 Apr;16(5):32-4, 36, 38.
10
Association of dialyzer reuse and hospitalization rates among hemodialysis patients in the US.美国血液透析患者中透析器复用与住院率的关联。
Am J Nephrol. 1999;19(6):641-8. doi: 10.1159/000013535.

引用本文的文献

1
Biocompatibility in hemodialysis: artificial membrane and human blood interactions.血液透析中的生物相容性:人工膜与人体血液的相互作用
BMC Nephrol. 2025 Aug 22;26(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-04401-y.
2
Plasma Exchange Therapy Using Solvent Detergent-Treated Plasma: An Observational Pilot Study on Complement, Neutrophil and Endothelial Cell Activation in a Case Series of Patients Suffering from Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome.使用溶剂去污剂处理血浆的血浆置换疗法:对一系列非典型溶血尿毒综合征患者补体、中性粒细胞和内皮细胞活化的观察性初步研究
Transfus Med Hemother. 2022 Mar 25;49(5):288-297. doi: 10.1159/000522137. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Hemodialysis-Related Complement and Contact Pathway Activation and Cardiovascular Risk: A Narrative Review.
血液透析相关的补体和接触途径激活与心血管风险:一项叙述性综述。
Kidney Med. 2021 Jun 9;3(4):607-618. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2021.04.006. eCollection 2021 Jul-Aug.
4
Neutrophil Activation and Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation in Dialysis Patients.透析患者中性粒细胞活化及中性粒细胞胞外诱捕网形成
Kidney Med. 2020 Sep 22;2(6):692-698.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2020.06.014. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.
5
Understanding Development of Malnutrition in Hemodialysis Patients: A Narrative Review.理解血液透析患者营养不良的发生发展:一项叙述性综述。
Nutrients. 2020 Oct 15;12(10):3147. doi: 10.3390/nu12103147.
6
Metabolic acidosis in hemodialysis: a neglected problem in Brazil.血液透析中的代谢性酸中毒:巴西被忽视的问题。
J Bras Nefrol. 2020 Jul-Sep;42(3):323-329. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2019-0210.
7
Green nephrology and eco-dialysis: a position statement by the Italian Society of Nephrology.绿色肾病学与生态透析:意大利肾脏病学会立场声明。
J Nephrol. 2020 Aug;33(4):681-698. doi: 10.1007/s40620-020-00734-z. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
8
Dialyzer reuse: is it safe and worth it?透析器复用:它安全且值得吗?
J Bras Nefrol. 2019 Sep 2;41(3):312-314. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2019-0134.