• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定位器固位:数量和构型的变化有影响吗?

Locator retention: does variation in number and configuration matter?

作者信息

Cayouette Monica J, Barnes Logan, McPherson Karen, Wright Gregory J

出版信息

Gen Dent. 2017 Jan-Feb;65(1):37-40.

PMID:28068264
Abstract

This pilot study was designed to collect initial data on overdenture attachment retention in varying configurations of attachment location in an implant-retained mandibular overdenture. A clear acrylic model of a mandible with 6 numbered implants and Locator resilient abutments was used to simulate implant placement in a patient. A clear acrylic denture was fabricated with 6 Locator housings to match the implants in the model. Attachments were tested in 4 different configurations: 2 implants, 2 and 5 (T25); 4 implants, 2-5 (T2345); 4 implants, 1, 3, 4, and 6 (T1346); and 6 implants, 1-6 (T1-6). Clear nylon male inserts were used for each test. The mean overall retentive strength across all 20 pulls was 576.0 N for configuration T1-6, 354.9 N for configuration T1346, 350.7 N for configuration T2345, and 189.9 N for configuration T25. Mean retentive strength also stabilized after the 7th pull for all 4 configurations, resulting in nonsignificant declines in retentive strength within each specific configuration after 7 pulls. Configuration T1-6 exhibited the greatest retentive strength relative to all other configurations both initially and after repeated application of force. Configurations T1346 and T2345 had similar retentive strengths, and both had greater retentive strength than T25. However, despite these differences, all 4 configurations exhibited similar losses in retentive strength from the repeated application of force during the first 7 pulls until stabilization occurred shortly thereafter.

摘要

本前瞻性研究旨在收集关于种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿中不同附着位置配置下覆盖义齿附着固位的初始数据。使用带有6个编号种植体和Locator弹性基台的下颌透明丙烯酸模型来模拟患者体内的种植体植入情况。制作了一个带有6个Locator容纳部的透明丙烯酸义齿,以匹配模型中的种植体。附着体在4种不同配置下进行测试:2颗种植体,2号和5号(T25);4颗种植体,2 - 5号(T2345);4颗种植体,1、3、4和6号(T1346);以及6颗种植体,1 - 6号(T1 - 6)。每次测试均使用透明尼龙阳型插入件。在所有20次牵拉中,配置T1 - 6的平均总固位力为576.0 N,配置T1346为354.9 N,配置T2345为350.7 N,配置T25为189.9 N。所有4种配置在第7次牵拉后平均固位力也趋于稳定,导致在每种特定配置下,7次牵拉后固位力下降不显著。相对于所有其他配置,配置T1 - 6在初始和反复施加力后均表现出最大的固位力。配置T1346和T2345具有相似的固位力,且两者都比T25具有更大的固位力。然而,尽管存在这些差异,但在最初的7次牵拉直至此后不久达到稳定期间,所有4种配置在反复施加力时固位力的损失相似。

相似文献

1
Locator retention: does variation in number and configuration matter?定位器固位:数量和构型的变化有影响吗?
Gen Dent. 2017 Jan-Feb;65(1):37-40.
2
Effects of implant angulations and attachment configurations on the retentive forces of locator attachment-retained overdentures.种植体角度和附着结构对Locator附着式覆盖义齿固位力的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Sep-Oct;29(5):1053-7. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3401.
3
The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.不同种植体角度和周期性脱位对覆盖义齿附着系统固位性能的体外影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Sep;102(3):140-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60134-7.
4
Brushing effect on the retentive force of retentive inserts in three denture attachments: An in vitro study.三种附着体固位体中固位插入体的固位力受刷动影响的体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Sep;128(3):487.e1-487.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.06.014. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
5
Effect of Distal Implant Inclination on Dislodging Forces of Different Locator Attachments Used for Mandibular Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.不同下颌覆盖义齿Locator 附着体脱位力与种植体末端倾斜角度的关系:一项体外研究。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):e666-e674. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12710. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
6
The change in retentive values of locator attachments and hader clips over time.定位器附件和哈德尔夹的固位值随时间的变化。
J Prosthodont. 2009 Aug;18(6):479-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00474.x. Epub 2009 Jun 3.
7
Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.基于种植体位置的两种种植体支持覆盖义齿的固位和稳定性比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Sep;112(3):515-21. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 May 10.
8
Effects of in vitro cyclic dislodging on retentive force and removal torque of three overdenture attachment systems.体外循环脱位对三种覆盖义齿附着系统固位力和脱位扭矩的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Apr;25(4):426-34. doi: 10.1111/clr.12156. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
9
Retentive Properties of O-Ring and Locator Attachments for Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.种植体覆盖义齿 O 型环和定位附件固位性能的体外研究。
J Prosthodont. 2018 Jul;27(6):568-576. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12534. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
10
Effects of Low-Profile Stud Attachment Configurations on Stress Distribution Characteristics of Implant-Retained Overdentures.低轮廓桩附着结构对种植体支持覆盖义齿应力分布特征的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Jul/Aug;33(4):754-763. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6207.