Nicholson Anna, Borland Ron, Bennet Pele, Davey Maureen, Sarin Jasmine, Van der Sterren Anke, Stevens Matthew, Thomas David
Wellbeing and Preventable Chronic Diseases Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Casuarina, Australia.
Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Oct 1;19(10):1163-1171. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw396.
The high prevalence of smoking among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia (39%) contributes substantially to health inequalities. This study assesses the impact of warning labels on quitting and related thoughts and behaviors for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander smokers.
Participants were recruited from communities served by 34 Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services and communities in the Torres Strait, Australia, using quota sampling. A cohort of 642 daily/weekly smokers completed relevant questions at baseline (April 2012-October 2013) and follow-up (August 2013-August 2014).
We considered three baseline predictor variables: noticing warning labels, forgoing cigarettes due to warning labels ("forgoing") and perceiving labels to be effective. Forgoing increased significantly between surveys only for those first surveyed prior to the introduction of plain packs (19% vs. 34%); however, there were no significant interactions between forgoing cigarettes and the introduction of new and enlarged graphic warning labels on plain packaging in any model. Forgoing cigarettes predicted attempting to quit (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-2.06) and, among those who did not want to quit at baseline, wanting to quit at follow-up (AOR: 3.19, 95% CI: 1.06-9.63). Among those less worried about future health effects, all three variables predicted being very worried at follow-up. Often noticing warning labels predicted correct responses to questions about health effects that had featured on warning labels (AOR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.20-2.82) but not for those not featured.
Graphic warning labels appear to have a positive impact on the understanding, concerns and motivations of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander smokers and, through these, their quit attempts.
Graphic warning labels are likely to be effective for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander smokers as they are for the broader Australian population.
澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民中吸烟率很高(39%),这在很大程度上导致了健康不平等。本研究评估了警示标签对澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民吸烟者戒烟及相关想法和行为的影响。
采用配额抽样法,从34个原住民社区控制卫生服务机构服务的社区以及澳大利亚托雷斯海峡的社区招募参与者。一组642名每日/每周吸烟者在基线期(2012年4月至2013年10月)和随访期(2013年8月至2014年8月)完成了相关问题的调查。
我们考虑了三个基线预测变量:注意到警示标签、因警示标签而放弃吸烟(“放弃”)以及认为标签有效。仅在引入平装烟之前首次接受调查的人群中,两次调查之间放弃吸烟的情况显著增加(从19%增至34%);然而,在任何模型中,放弃吸烟与在平装包装上引入新的和扩大的图形警示标签之间均无显著交互作用。放弃吸烟可预测尝试戒烟(调整后的优势比[AOR]:1.45,95%置信区间[CI]:1.02 - 2.06),并且在基线期不想戒烟的人群中,可预测在随访期想要戒烟(AOR:3.19,95% CI:1.06 - 9.63)。在那些对未来健康影响不太担心的人群中,所有这三个变量都可预测在随访期会非常担心。经常注意到警示标签可预测对警示标签上出现的关于健康影响问题的正确回答(AOR:1.84,95% CI:1.20 - 2.82),但对未出现的问题则不然。
图形警示标签似乎对澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民吸烟者的理解、担忧和动机产生了积极影响,并通过这些影响了他们的戒烟尝试。
图形警示标签对澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民吸烟者可能像对更广泛的澳大利亚人群一样有效。