Suppr超能文献

改良早期预警评分(MEWS)在医学脓毒症患者中界值的评估:意大利多中心前瞻性队列的二次分析(SNOOPII 研究)。

Evaluation of the threshold value for the modified early warning score (MEWS) in medical septic patients: a secondary analysis of an Italian multicentric prospective cohort (SNOOPII study).

机构信息

From the Department of Internal Medicine, Cervesi Hospital, Cattolica, (RN), AUSL Romagna, Cattolica, Italy.

Department of Internal Medicine, Media Valle del Tevere Hospital, ASL Umbria 1, Todi, Italy.

出版信息

QJM. 2017 Jun 1;110(6):369-373. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcw229.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Due to aging and resources limitation, septic patients are often admitted to medical wards (MWs). Early warning deterioration is a relevant issue in this setting. Unfortunately, a suitable prognostic score has not been identified, yet.

AIM

To explore the ability of Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) to predict the in-hospital mortality in septic patients admitted to MWs.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of a multicentric prospective study.

METHODS

Consecutive septic patients with positive blood culture admitted to 31 Italian MWs were included. Baseline characteristics, clinics, isolates, rate of transfer to ICU, MEWS was collected on admission according to the study protocol. The accuracy of MEWS in predicting the in-hospital mortality was assessed with the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV), likelihood ratio (LR) were calculated for different MEWS cut-offs and age/comorbidities subgroups.

RESULTS

In total 526 patients were included in this analysis. Median MEWS was (range 0-11). In-hospital mortality was 14.8% and transfer to ICU 1.3%. Mortality progressively increased according to MEWS (3% in MEWS 0 vs. 27% in MEWS >5; Chi square for trend P < 0.05). The AUC of MEWS in predicting in-hospital mortality was 0.596 (95% CI, 0.524, 0.669). MEWS did not appear to have an adequate sensitivity, sensibility, PPV, NPV and LR both in the whole population and in the pre-specified subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings do not seem to support the use of MEWS to predict the in-hospital mortality risk of sepsis in MWs.

摘要

背景

由于人口老龄化和资源限制,败血症患者经常被收治到内科病房(MWs)。在这种情况下,早期预警恶化是一个相关问题。不幸的是,尚未确定合适的预后评分。

目的

探讨改良早期预警评分(MEWS)预测 MWs 收治的败血症患者院内死亡率的能力。

设计

多中心前瞻性研究的二次分析。

方法

连续纳入 31 家意大利 MWs 收治的血培养阳性败血症患者。根据研究方案,收集患者的基本特征、临床情况、分离株、转 ICU 率和入院时的 MEWS。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积评估 MEWS 预测院内死亡率的准确性。对于不同的 MEWS 截断值和年龄/合并症亚组,计算 MEWS 的灵敏度、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值(PPV 和 NPV)、似然比(LR)。

结果

共纳入 526 例患者进行分析。中位 MEWS 为(范围 0-11)。院内死亡率为 14.8%,转 ICU 率为 1.3%。死亡率随 MEWS 升高而增加(MEWS 0 组为 3%,MEWS>5 组为 27%;趋势检验的卡方值 P<0.05)。MEWS 预测院内死亡率的 AUC 为 0.596(95%CI,0.524,0.669)。MEWS 在整个研究人群和预设亚组中均显示出敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV 和 LR 不足。

结论

我们的研究结果似乎不支持使用 MEWS 预测 MWs 败血症患者的院内死亡率风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验