• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌筛查阳性后的不完全诊断随访:系统评价。

Incomplete diagnostic follow-up after a positive colorectal cancer screening test: a systematic review.

机构信息

Public Health England West Midlands, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Mar 1;40(1):e46-e58. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdw147.

DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdw147
PMID:28069989
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using faecal occult blood or faecal immunological testing (FOBT/FIT) involves completion of a screening test-then if required a follow-up diagnostic test.

METHODS

A systematic review, of EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar, of studies up to 2016. Studies explored characteristics behind, reasons for and interventions to reduce incomplete diagnostic testing after a positive FOBT/FIT in CRC screening.

RESULTS

A total of 68 articles were included (63 studies). There is evidence of disparities in uptake by socioeconomic position and ethnicity, as well as geographic remoteness. Positive health beliefs, health knowledge and CRC screening attendance history are associated with increased diagnostic testing. Facets of organised screening, including performance feedback and funding improve follow-up-whilst guidelines increase diagnostic testing and reduce inappropriate exclusions. Between 2 and 11% of participants refuse follow-up, with perception of pain critical. Interventions, notably a screening specialist to aid the patient journey, as well as tracking and reminder systems, can increase diagnostic testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Although rates of non-attendance in those eligible are low, this represents a group with health care need. Disparities must be eliminated to alleviate wider health inequity. Organised, screening can reduce incomplete diagnostic testing, as can accessible health information.

摘要

背景

结直肠癌(CRC)筛查采用粪便潜血或粪便免疫检测(FOBT/FIT),包括完成筛查测试-然后如果需要,进行后续诊断测试。

方法

对 EMBASE、MEDLINE、Cochrane 图书馆和 Google Scholar 进行系统回顾,检索截至 2016 年的研究。这些研究探讨了在 CRC 筛查中,FOBT/FIT 阳性后,未完成诊断检测的原因、背后的特征以及干预措施。

结果

共纳入 68 篇文章(63 项研究)。在社会经济地位和种族以及地理偏远程度方面,存在检测率差异的证据。积极的健康信念、健康知识和 CRC 筛查参与史与增加诊断检测有关。有组织的筛查方面,包括绩效反馈和资金投入可改善随访情况-而指南则可增加诊断检测并减少不适当的排除。有 2%至 11%的参与者拒绝随访,对疼痛的感知至关重要。干预措施,特别是帮助患者完成检测过程的筛查专家,以及跟踪和提醒系统,可以增加诊断检测。

结论

尽管符合条件的人群中未参与筛查的比例较低,但这代表了有医疗需求的人群。必须消除差异,以减轻更广泛的健康不平等。有组织的筛查,以及可获得的健康信息,可以减少未完成的诊断检测。

相似文献

1
Incomplete diagnostic follow-up after a positive colorectal cancer screening test: a systematic review.结直肠癌筛查阳性后的不完全诊断随访:系统评价。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Mar 1;40(1):e46-e58. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdw147.
2
Association Between Primary Care Visits and Colorectal Cancer Screening Outcomes in the Era of Population Health Outreach.人口健康推广时代初级保健就诊与结直肠癌筛查结果之间的关联
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Oct;31(10):1190-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3760-9. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
3
Impact of continued mailed fecal tests in the patient-centered medical home: Year 3 of the Systems of Support to Increase Colon Cancer Screening and Follow-Up randomized trial.以患者为中心的医疗之家持续邮寄粪便检测的影响:增加结肠癌筛查与随访支持系统随机试验的第3年
Cancer. 2016 Jan 15;122(2):312-21. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29734. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
4
Effect of Colonoscopy Outreach vs Fecal Immunochemical Test Outreach on Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.结肠镜检查外展与粪便免疫化学检测外展对结直肠癌筛查完成率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2017 Sep 5;318(9):806-815. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11389.
5
Faecal occult blood testing (FOBT)-based colorectal cancer screening trends and predictors of non-use: findings from the South Australian setting and implications for increasing FOBT uptake.基于粪便潜血检测(FOBT)的结直肠癌筛查趋势及未使用的预测因素:南澳大利亚地区的研究结果及对提高FOBT接受率的启示
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Feb;42(1):45-52. doi: 10.1071/AH16126.
6
Comparative effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to annual colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: a randomized clinical trial.多方面干预措施提高社区卫生中心年度结直肠癌筛查依从性的效果比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Aug;174(8):1235-41. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2352.
7
Contribution of patient, physician, and environmental factors to demographic and health variation in colonoscopy follow-up for abnormal colorectal cancer screening test results.患者、医生及环境因素对结直肠癌筛查异常结果结肠镜随访中人口统计学及健康差异的影响。
Cancer. 2017 Sep 15;123(18):3502-3512. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30765. Epub 2017 May 11.
8
Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.结直肠癌混合筛查策略的健康获益和成本效益。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Sep;11(9):1158-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
9
Comparison of guaiac and immunological fecal occult blood tests in colorectal cancer screening: the patient perspective.结直肠癌筛查中愈创木脂法与免疫粪便潜血试验的比较:患者视角
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov;45(11):1345-9. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2010.497937. Epub 2010 Jun 21.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing adherence to psychological intervention referrals among women who screened positive for postpartum depression in Shenzhen, China (2016-2020).中国深圳(2016 - 2020年)产后抑郁症筛查呈阳性的女性中影响心理干预转诊依从性的因素
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 25;15(1):31298. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17281-x.
2
Think-Aloud Testing of a Companion App for Colonoscopy Examinations: Usability Study.结肠镜检查辅助应用程序的有声思维测试:可用性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Feb 12;12:e67043. doi: 10.2196/67043.
3
Explaining the Correlates of the Multi-Theory Model (MTM) of Health Behavior Change in Visual (Structural) Colorectal Cancer Screening Examinations.
解释视觉(结构)结直肠癌筛查检查中健康行为改变多理论模型(MTM)的相关因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 12;22(1):98. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22010098.
4
Assessing the Relationship Between Self-Rated General Health and Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake.评估自我评定的总体健康状况与结直肠癌筛查接受情况之间的关系。
Cureus. 2024 Nov 19;16(11):e74014. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74014. eCollection 2024 Nov.
5
Perceptions of the Impact of Comorbidity on the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: Qualitative Study With Bowel Screening Participants and Staff.共病对肠癌筛查计划影响的认知:肠癌筛查参与人员和工作人员的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14126. doi: 10.1111/hex.14126.
6
Sociodemographic variations in the uptake of faecal immunochemical tests in primary care: a retrospective study.社会人口统计学因素对初级保健中粪便免疫化学检测接受率的影响:一项回顾性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Oct 26;73(736):e843-e849. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0033. Print 2023 Nov.
7
Implementation of a home-based colorectal cancer screening intervention in Malaysia (CRC-SIM).马来西亚基于家庭的结直肠癌筛查干预措施的实施(CRC-SIM)。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Jan 6;23(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10487-6.
8
Reasons for No Colonoscopy After an Unfavorable Screening Result in Dutch Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Nationwide Questionnaire.荷兰结直肠癌筛查中因初筛结果不佳而未行结肠镜检查的原因:一项全国性问卷调查。
Ann Fam Med. 2022 Nov-Dec;20(6):526-534. doi: 10.1370/afm.2871.
9
Robotic, self-propelled, self-steerable, and disposable colonoscopes: Reality or pipe dream? A state of the art review.机器人控制、自行推进、自动转向、一次性使用的结肠镜:现实还是白日梦? 最新技术综述。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Sep 21;28(35):5093-5110. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i35.5093.
10
Barriers and facilitators to colonoscopy following fecal immunochemical test screening for colorectal cancer: A key informant interview study.结直肠癌免疫化学粪便检测筛查后行结肠镜检查的障碍和促进因素:关键知情人访谈研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jun;105(6):1652-1662. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.09.022. Epub 2021 Sep 17.