Trethowan Paul, Fuller Andrea, Haw Anna, Hart Tom, Markham Andrew, Loveridge Andrew, Hetem Robyn, du Preez Byron, Macdonald David W
Wildlife Conservation Research Unit The Recanati-Kaplan Centre Department of Zoology University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Brain Function Research Group School of Physiology Faculty of Health Sciences University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa.
Ecol Evol. 2016 Dec 20;7(1):253-262. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2556. eCollection 2017 Jan.
It has been proposed that there is a thermal cost of the mane to male lions, potentially leading to increased body surface temperatures (), increased sperm abnormalities, and to lower food intake during hot summer months. To test whether a mane imposes thermal costs on males, we measured core body temperature () continuously for approximately 1 year in 18 free-living lions. There was no difference in the 24-hr maximum of males ( = 12) and females ( = 6), and males had a 24-hr mean that was 0.2 ± 0.1°C lower than females after correcting for seasonal effects. Although feeding on a particular day increased 24-hr mean and 24-hr maximum , this phenomenon was true of both male and female lions, and females had higher 24-hr mean and 24-hr maximum than males, on both days when lions did not feed, and on days when lions did feed. Twenty-four-hour was not influenced by mane length or color, and 24-hr mean was negatively correlated with mane length. These data contradict the suggestion that there exists a thermal cost to male lions in possessing a long dark mane, but do not preclude the possibility that males compensate for a mane with increased heat loss. The increased insulation caused by a mane does not necessarily have to impair heat loss by males, which in hot environments is primarily through respiratory evaporative cooling, nor does in necessarily lead to increased heat gain, as lions are nocturnal and seek shade during the day. The mane may even act as a heat shield by increasing insulation. However, dominant male lions frequent water points more than twice as often as females, raising the possibility that male lions are increasing water uptake to facilitate increased evaporative cooling. The question of whether male lions with manes compensate for a thermal cost to the mane remains unresolved, but male lions with access to water do not have higher than females or males with smaller manes.
有人提出,鬃毛会给雄狮带来热量消耗,这可能导致它们的体表温度升高、精子异常增多,以及在炎热的夏季食量减少。为了测试鬃毛是否会给雄性狮子带来热量消耗,我们对18只自由生活的狮子连续约一年测量其核心体温。雄性狮子(n = 12)和雌性狮子(n = 6)的24小时最高体温没有差异,在校正季节影响后,雄性狮子的24小时平均体温比雌性狮子低0.2±0.1°C。尽管在特定的一天进食会使24小时平均体温和24小时最高体温升高,但这种现象在雄性和雌性狮子中都存在,并且在狮子不进食的日子以及进食的日子里,雌性狮子的24小时平均体温和24小时最高体温都高于雄性狮子。24小时体温不受鬃毛长度或颜色的影响,24小时平均体温与鬃毛长度呈负相关。这些数据与拥有长而深色鬃毛会给雄狮带来热量消耗的观点相矛盾,但并不排除雄性狮子通过增加散热来补偿鬃毛影响的可能性。鬃毛增加的隔热作用不一定会损害雄性狮子的散热,在炎热环境中,雄性狮子主要通过呼吸蒸发散热,也不一定会导致热量增加,因为狮子是夜行性动物,白天会寻找阴凉处。鬃毛甚至可能通过增加隔热起到热屏蔽的作用。然而,占主导地位的雄狮前往水源点的频率是雌狮的两倍多,这增加了雄性狮子增加水分摄入以促进蒸发散热增加的可能性。有鬃毛的雄性狮子是否会补偿鬃毛带来的热量消耗这一问题仍未解决,但能够获取水源的雄性狮子的体温并不高于雌性狮子或鬃毛较短的雄性狮子。