Chan Jillian, Heath Matthew
School of Kinesiology, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada.
Graduate Program in Neuroscience, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Apr;235(4):1041-1051. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4860-9. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
Relative visual information has been shown to mediate grasping responses directed to an area previously occupied by a target object (i.e., pantomime-grasping) and is an information type functionally distinct from the absolute visual information supporting naturalistic grasping (i.e., grasping a physical target). Pantomime- and naturalistic grasps differ not only in terms of their visual properties, but also because the former lacks physical interaction with a target object (i.e., no-haptic feedback). The absence of haptic feedback may represent a reason why pantomime- and naturalistic grasps differ. To address this issue, participants completed pantomime-grasps to objects embedded in fins-in and fins-out configurations of the Müller-Lyer (ML) illusion following a 2000-ms visual delay when haptic feedback was unavailable (H- condition), and when experimentally induced (H+ condition). In particular, in the H+ condition the experimenter placed a physical target object between participants' thumb and forefinger after they completed their grasping response. H- and H+ conditions were performed when online vision was available (i.e., Experiment 1) and when withdrawn (i.e., Experiment 2). If haptic feedback influences grasping, then the absolute information afforded from physically touching a target object (i.e., the H+ condition) should result in aperture metrics that are refractory-or attenuated-to the relative properties of the ML figures. Grip apertures in H- and H+ conditions were "tricked" in a direction consistent with the perceptual effects of the ML illusion; however, Experiment 2 showed that illusory effects were attenuated in the H+ condition. In other words, responses without online vision showed evidence of a visuo-haptic calibration. These results provide convergent evidence that haptic and visual feedback play a salient role in considering the extant literature's documented report of kinematic differences between pantomime- and naturalistic grasps.
相对视觉信息已被证明可介导针对先前被目标物体占据区域的抓握反应(即模拟抓握),并且是一种功能上与支持自然抓握的绝对视觉信息(即抓握物理目标)不同的信息类型。模拟抓握和自然抓握不仅在视觉属性方面存在差异,还因为前者缺乏与目标物体的物理交互(即无触觉反馈)。缺乏触觉反馈可能是模拟抓握和自然抓握存在差异的一个原因。为了解决这个问题,参与者在触觉反馈不可用(H-条件)以及实验性诱导(H+条件)时,在2000毫秒视觉延迟后对嵌入缪勒-莱尔(ML)错觉的鳍进和鳍出配置中的物体进行模拟抓握。具体而言,在H+条件下,参与者完成抓握反应后,实验者将一个物理目标物体放在他们的拇指和食指之间。当在线视觉可用时(即实验1)和撤回时(即实验2)进行H-和H+条件测试。如果触觉反馈影响抓握,那么从物理接触目标物体获得的绝对信息(即H+条件)应该导致孔径指标对ML图形的相对属性具有抗性或减弱。H-和H+条件下的握力孔径在与ML错觉的感知效应一致的方向上被“欺骗”;然而,实验2表明,在H+条件下错觉效应减弱。换句话说,没有在线视觉的反应显示出视觉-触觉校准的证据。这些结果提供了趋同的证据,表明触觉和视觉反馈在考虑现有文献中记录的模拟抓握和自然抓握之间运动学差异的报告中起着重要作用。