一项针对智力障碍个体的姿势能力，比较单脚跳和跳跃训练与感觉运动康复计划的开放标签随机对照试验。
An open-label randomized control trial of hopping and jumping training versus sensorimotor rehabilitation programme on postural capacities in individuals with intellectual disabilities.
作者信息
Borji Rihab, Sahli Sonia, Baccouch Rym, Laatar Rabeb, Kachouri Hiba, Rebai Haithem
机构信息
Unité de Recherche Education, Motricité, Sports et santé, (EM2S, UR15JS01), Institut Supérieur du Sport et de l'Education Physique de Sfax, Université de Sfax, Tunisia.
出版信息
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Mar;31(2):318-323. doi: 10.1111/jar.12324. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a hopping and jumping training programme (HJP) versus a sensorimotor rehabilitation programme (SRP) on postural performances in children with intellectual disability.
METHODS
Three groups of children with intellectual disability participated in the study: the HJP group, the SRP group and a control group. Postural capacities were tested with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and the Tinetti tests. The HJP and the SRP groups participated in the training programmes for eight weeks. Then, all participants were retested.
RESULTS
Results showed that before the training period, there are no significant differences between the three groups. After the training period, the BBS and the Tinetti scores increased significantly in the HJP group and the SRP group with greater extent in the HJP group than in the STP group.
CONCLUSION
We suggest that HJP training is more recommended to improve postural capacities in children with intellectual disability.
背景
本研究旨在比较跳跃训练计划（HJP）与感觉运动康复计划（SRP）对智障儿童姿势表现的有效性。
方法
三组智障儿童参与了该研究：HJP组、SRP组和对照组。使用伯格平衡量表（BBS）和蒂内蒂测试来测试姿势能力。HJP组和SRP组参加了为期八周的训练计划。然后，对所有参与者进行重新测试。
结果
结果显示，在训练期之前，三组之间没有显著差异。训练期后，HJP组和SRP组的BBS和蒂内蒂得分显著提高，HJP组的提高幅度大于STP组。
结论
我们建议，更推荐采用HJP训练来提高智障儿童的姿势能力。
Zotero 插件