Bonczar Genowefa, Walczycka Maria, Duda Iwona
Animal Products Technology Department, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Poland.
Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment. 2016 Oct-Dec;15(4):379-389. doi: 10.17306/J.AFS.2016.4.36.
The aim of this research was to observe the changes which take place in the electrophoretic picture of milk proteins after pasteurisation and inoculation with different starter cultures (both traditional and probiotic). After incubation, the yoghurt, kefir, acidified milk, fermented Bifidobacterium bifidum drink and Lactobacillus acidophillus drink were chilled for 14 days to observe the changes which occurred.
The research materials were raw and pasteurised milk, as well as fermented milk- based drinks. The raw milk used for research came from Polish Holstein-Fresian black and white cows. The milk was sampled 3 times and divided into 5 parts, each of which was pasteurised at 95°C for 10 min and then cooled for inoculation: yoghurt to 45°C, kefir and acidified milk to 22°C and drinks with Bifidobacterium bifidum and Lactobacillus acidophillus to 38°C. Milk was inoculated with lyophilised, direct vat starter cultures, in an amount equal to 2% of the working starter. For the production of fermented drinks, the subsequent starters were applied: "YC-180" Christian Hansen for yoghurt, "D" Biolacta-Texel-Rhodia for kefir, CH-N--11 Christian Hansen for acidified milk, starter by Christian Hansen for the probiotic Bifidobacterium bifidum milk, starter by Biolacta-Texel-Rhodia for the probiotic Lactobacillus acidophillus milk. The analyses were conducted in raw, pasteurised and freshly fermented milk as well as in milk drinks stored for 14 days. The total solid content was estimated by the drying method; the fat content by the Gerber method; the lactose content by the Bertrand method; the protein content by the Kjeldahl method with Buchi apparatus; the density of milk was measured with lactodensimeter; acidity with a pH-meter; and potential acidity by Soxhlet-Henkl method (AOAC, 1990). The electrophoretic separation of proteins in raw and pasteurised milk, as well as in freshly produced milk drinks and those stored for 14 days, was performed with SDS-PAGE (on polyacrylamid gel) basing on procedure described by Laemmli (1970).
It was shown that, in comparison with raw milk, the pasteurised milk had smaller amounts of αs-, β- and κ-casein, whereas the shares of γ-casein and peptides were greater, and there were no changes in immunoglobulin, α-lactalbumin or β-lactoglobulin levels, which indicated that hydrolysis of caseins had occurred. In all freshly fermented milk drinks, a drop in αs- and β-casein was observed relative to raw milk. An increase in peptides and γ-casein was also noticed (with the exception of acidified milk). There were differences in α-lactalbumin and β-lactoglobulin levels between the different drinks: raw, pasteurised or freshly fermented milk. It was shown that kefir, compared to the other drinks, had the lowest levels of αs- and β-casein, α-lactalbumin and of peptides, as well as the highest level of γ-casein, which is evidence of an increased rate of hydrolysis in that drink. It was stated that, during the storage of fermented milk drinks, the levels of lactoferrin, serum albumin and peptides significantly increased whereas the content of κ-casein diminished. The proportions of serum albumin and lactoferrin in fermented milk drinks increased relative to raw milk and/or after storage, which is evidence of aggregation of proteins of low molecular mass into bigger conglomerates.
The observed differences between fermented milks, including during chilled storage, in the amounts of individual proteins proves the different proteolytic abilities of starter cultures used in fermented milk production. α-lactoalbumin and β-lactoglobulin are, besides caseins, the most allergenic milk proteins. So, kefir, because of its low α-lactoalbumin content, and Bifidobacterium bifidum milk, with the lowest content of β-lactoglobulin, were the most advantageous and least allergenic drinks examined.
本研究的目的是观察巴氏杀菌以及接种不同发酵剂(包括传统发酵剂和益生菌发酵剂)后乳蛋白电泳图谱的变化。培养后,将酸奶、开菲尔、酸化乳、双歧杆菌发酵饮料和嗜酸乳杆菌饮料冷藏14天,以观察所发生的变化。
研究材料为生鲜乳和巴氏杀菌乳,以及发酵乳饮料。用于研究的生鲜乳来自波兰荷斯坦-弗里生黑白花奶牛。牛奶采样3次并分成5份,每份在95°C下巴氏杀菌10分钟,然后冷却用于接种:酸奶接种至45°C,开菲尔和酸化乳接种至22°C,双歧杆菌和嗜酸乳杆菌饮料接种至38°C。用冻干的直投式发酵剂接种牛奶,接种量相当于工作发酵剂的2%。对于发酵饮料的生产,使用了以下后续发酵剂:用于酸奶的“YC - 180”(科汉森公司)、用于开菲尔的“D”(百福莱 - 特塞尔 - 罗地亚公司)、用于酸化乳的CH - N - 11(科汉森公司)、用于益生菌双歧杆菌乳的科汉森公司发酵剂、用于益生菌嗜酸乳杆菌乳的百福莱 - 特塞尔 - 罗地亚公司发酵剂。分析在生鲜乳、巴氏杀菌乳、新鲜发酵乳以及储存14天的乳饮料中进行。总固体含量通过干燥法估算;脂肪含量通过盖勃法测定;乳糖含量通过贝特朗法测定;蛋白质含量通过凯氏定氮法结合布氏仪器测定;牛奶密度用乳密度计测量;酸度用pH计测量;潜在酸度通过索氏 - 亨克尔法(AOAC,1990)测定。根据Laemmli(1970)描述的方法,采用SDS - PAGE(聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳)对生鲜乳、巴氏杀菌乳、新鲜生产的乳饮料以及储存14天的乳饮料中的蛋白质进行电泳分离。
结果表明,与生鲜乳相比,巴氏杀菌乳中的αs - 、β - 和κ - 酪蛋白含量较少,而γ - 酪蛋白和肽的比例较高,免疫球蛋白、α - 乳白蛋白或β - 乳球蛋白水平没有变化,这表明发生了酪蛋白的水解。在所有新鲜发酵的乳饮料中,相对于生鲜乳,观察到αs - 和β - 酪蛋白含量下降。还注意到肽和γ - 酪蛋白增加(酸化乳除外)。不同饮料(生鲜乳、巴氏杀菌乳或新鲜发酵乳)之间的α - 乳白蛋白和β - 乳球蛋白水平存在差异。结果表明,与其他饮料相比,开菲尔中的αs - 和β - 酪蛋白、α - 乳白蛋白和肽的水平最低,而γ - 酪蛋白水平最高,这证明该饮料中水解速率增加。据指出,在发酵乳饮料储存期间,乳铁蛋白、血清白蛋白和肽的水平显著增加,而κ - 酪蛋白含量减少。发酵乳饮料中血清白蛋白和乳铁蛋白的比例相对于生鲜乳和/或储存后增加,这证明低分子质量蛋白质聚集形成了更大的聚集体。
观察到的发酵乳之间(包括冷藏储存期间)个别蛋白质含量的差异证明了用于发酵乳生产的发酵剂具有不同的蛋白水解能力。除了酪蛋白外,α - 乳白蛋白和β - 乳球蛋白是最具致敏性的乳蛋白。因此,开菲尔因其低α - 乳白蛋白含量,以及双歧杆菌乳因其最低的β - 乳球蛋白含量,是所检测的最具优势且致敏性最低的饮料。