• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣植入术后与外科主动脉瓣置换术后的心脏康复计划:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Cardiac rehabilitation programme after transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Ribeiro Gustavo S, Melo Rosangela D, Deresz Luís F, Dal Lago Pedro, Pontes Mauro Rn, Karsten Marlus

机构信息

1 Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Brazil.

2 Departamento de Educação Física, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Brazil.

出版信息

Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 May;24(7):688-697. doi: 10.1177/2047487316686442. Epub 2017 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1177/2047487316686442
PMID:28071146
Abstract

Background Aortic stenosis is a valvular heart disease characterised by fixed obstruction of the left ventricular outflow. It can be managed by surgical aortic valve replacement (sAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This review aimed to describe the evidence supporting a cardiac rehabilitation programme on functional capacity and quality of life in aortic stenosis patients after sAVR or TAVI. Methods The search was conducted on multiple databases from January to March 2016. All studies were eligible that evaluated the effects of a post-interventional cardiac rehabilitation programme in aortic stenosis patients. The methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. Meta-analysis was performed separately by procedure and between procedures. The walked distance during the six-minute walk test (6MWD) and Barthel index were evaluated. The analysis was conducted in Review Manager. Results Five studies were included (292 TAVI and 570 sAVR patients). The meta-analysis showed that a cardiac rehabilitation programme was associated with a significant improvement in 6MWD (0.69 (0.47, 0.91); P < 0.001) and Barthel index (0.80 (0.29, 1.30); P = 0.002) after TAVI and 6MWD (0.79 (0.43, 1.15); P < 0.001) and Barthel index (0.93 (0.67, 1.18); P < 0.001) after sAVR. In addition, the meta-analysis showed that the cardiac rehabilitation programme promoted a similar gain in 6MWD (4.28% (-12.73, 21.29); P = 0.62) and Barthel index (-1.52 points (-4.81, 1.76); P = 0.36) after sAVR or TAVI. Conclusions The cardiac rehabilitation programme improved the functional capacity and quality of life in aortic stenosis patients. Patients who underwent TAVI benefitted with a cardiac rehabilitation programme similar to sAVR patients.

摘要

背景

主动脉瓣狭窄是一种以左心室流出道固定梗阻为特征的心脏瓣膜疾病。可通过外科主动脉瓣置换术(sAVR)或经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)进行治疗。本综述旨在描述支持心脏康复计划对接受sAVR或TAVI治疗后的主动脉瓣狭窄患者的功能能力和生活质量影响的证据。

方法

于2016年1月至3月在多个数据库进行检索。所有评估介入后心脏康复计划对主动脉瓣狭窄患者影响的研究均符合纳入标准。采用PEDro量表评估方法学质量。按手术方式分别及在不同手术方式之间进行荟萃分析。评估六分钟步行试验(6MWD)中的步行距离和巴氏指数。分析在Review Manager中进行。

结果

纳入5项研究(292例TAVI患者和570例sAVR患者)。荟萃分析表明,心脏康复计划与TAVI术后6MWD显著改善相关(0.69(0.47,0.91);P<0.001)以及巴氏指数改善相关(0.80(0.29,1.30);P = 0.002),与sAVR术后6MWD改善相关(0.79(0.43,1.15);P<0.001)以及巴氏指数改善相关(0.93(0.67,1.18);P<0.001)。此外,荟萃分析表明,心脏康复计划在sAVR或TAVI术后促进6MWD获得相似的增加幅度(4.28%(-12.73,21.29);P = 0.62)以及巴氏指数增加幅度相似(-1.52分(-4.81,1.76);P = 0.36)。

结论

心脏康复计划改善了主动脉瓣狭窄患者的功能能力和生活质量。接受TAVI治疗的患者从心脏康复计划中获益程度与接受sAVR治疗的患者相似。

相似文献

1
Cardiac rehabilitation programme after transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement: Systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后与外科主动脉瓣置换术后的心脏康复计划:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 May;24(7):688-697. doi: 10.1177/2047487316686442. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
2
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis in high surgical risk patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗高危外科手术风险主动脉瓣狭窄患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 May 10;13(5):e0196877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196877. eCollection 2018.
3
Meta-analysis of longitudinal comparison of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low to intermediate surgical risk.低至中度手术风险患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术纵向比较的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Dec 1;110(12):8097-8106. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002158.
4
Valve in valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) versus redo-Surgical aortic valve replacement (redo-SAVR): A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置入术(ViV-TAVI)中的瓣中瓣技术与再次外科主动脉瓣置换术(redo-SAVR):一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Oct;31(5):661-671. doi: 10.1111/joic.12520. Epub 2018 May 20.
5
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Intermediate Surgical Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.严重主动脉瓣狭窄且手术风险中等的患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Feb;27(2):227-234. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.02.032. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
6
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing 3 Aortic Valve Interventions: The THIRD Multicenter Registry.接受3种主动脉瓣干预治疗患者的临床特征与结局:THIRD多中心注册研究
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jan 13;18(1):103-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.10.037.
7
Impact of previous cardiac surgery in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review.既往心脏手术对接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的影响:一项系统评价。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017 Oct;58(5):787-793. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.17.09636-7. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
8
Bioprosthetic valve fracture for valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with structural valve degeneration: Systematic review with meta-analysis.生物瓣瓣叶断裂行经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗结构性瓣膜衰败患者:系统评价及荟萃分析。
J Card Surg. 2021 Dec;36(12):4722-4731. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16032. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
9
Cardiac Rehabilitation After TAVI -A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的心脏康复——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023 Mar;48(3):101531. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101531. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
10
Transcatheter vs surgical aortic-valve replacement in low- to intermediate-surgical-risk candidates: A meta-analysis and systematic review.低至中度手术风险患者经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较:一项荟萃分析与系统评价
Clin Cardiol. 2017 Nov;40(11):974-981. doi: 10.1002/clc.22807. Epub 2017 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Modern Era: Evidence, Equity, and Evolving Delivery Models Across the Cardiovascular Spectrum.现代心脏康复:心血管领域的证据、公平性及不断发展的服务模式
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 7;14(15):5573. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155573.
2
Long term efficacy and safety of MICT of cardiopulmonary function in patients after TAVR extended follow up of ENERGY study.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后患者心肺功能微创干预的长期疗效及安全性——ENERGY研究的延长随访
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 4;15(1):28344. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13451-z.
3
JUMPSTART pilot: assessing the acceptability and feasibility of a novel early mobilization program following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
JUMPSTART试点项目:评估经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新型早期活动计划的可接受性和可行性。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jun 25;12:1568844. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1568844. eCollection 2025.
4
Osteosarcopenia in older adults undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A narrative review of mortality and frailty implications.接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术的老年人中的骨质肌肉减少症:关于死亡率和衰弱影响的叙述性综述
World J Cardiol. 2025 May 26;17(5):107320. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i5.107320.
5
Cardiac Rehabilitation in TAVI Patients: Safety and Benefits: A Narrative Review.经导管主动脉瓣置入术患者的心脏康复:安全性与益处:一篇叙述性综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 1;61(4):648. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040648.
6
JUMPSTART: evaluation of an early mobilization program following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.JUMPSTART:经导管主动脉瓣置换术后早期活动计划的评估
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Mar 25;25(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04665-0.
7
Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Patients After Heart Valve Surgery: A Systematic Review and Re-Evaluation With Evidence Mapping Study.心脏瓣膜置换术后患者的运动心脏康复:一项基于证据图谱研究的系统评价与重新评估
Clin Cardiol. 2025 Mar;48(3):e70117. doi: 10.1002/clc.70117.
8
Barriers and facilitators to physical activity after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A mixed-methods study.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后身体活动的障碍与促进因素:一项混合方法研究。
J Rehabil Med. 2025 Feb 18;57:jrm39974. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v57.39974.
9
Development of a complex intervention to prevent complications in patients recovering at home after transcatheter aortic valve replacement by optimizing home-based cardiac rehabilitation processes: a Delphi study.通过优化家庭心脏康复流程,开发一种复杂干预措施以预防经导管主动脉瓣置换术后在家康复患者的并发症:一项德尔菲研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 18;12:1491311. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1491311. eCollection 2024.
10
A Qualitative Study of Barriers and Facilitators to the Uptake of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Octogenarians.一项关于八旬老人接受心脏康复治疗的障碍与促进因素的定性研究。
Geriatrics (Basel). 2024 Dec 13;9(6):161. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics9060161.