Hülsdünker Thorben, Strüder Heiko K, Mierau Andreas
1Institute of Movement and Neurosciences, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, GERMANY; and 2Department of Exercise and Sport Science, International University of Health, Exercise & Sports, LUNEX, Differdange, Luxembourg, GERMANY.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Jun;49(6):1097-1110. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001198.
Athletes participating in ball or racquet sports have to respond to visual stimuli under critical time pressure. Previous studies used visual contrast stimuli to determine visual perception and visuomotor reaction in athletes and nonathletes; however, ball and racquet sports are characterized by motion rather than contrast visual cues. Because visual contrast and motion signals are processed in different cortical regions, this study aimed to determine differences in perception and processing of visual motion between athletes and nonathletes.
Twenty-five skilled badminton players and 28 age-matched nonathletic controls participated in this study. Using a 64-channel EEG system, we investigated visual motion perception/processing in the motion-sensitive middle temporal (MT) cortical area in response to radial motion of different velocities. In a simple visuomotor reaction task, visuomotor transformation in Brodmann area 6 (BA6) and BA4 as well as muscular activation (EMG onset) and visuomotor reaction time (VMRT) were investigated. Stimulus- and response-locked potentials were determined to differentiate between perceptual and motor-related processes.
As compared with nonathletes, athletes showed earlier EMG onset times (217 vs 178 ms, P < 0.001), accompanied by a faster VMRT (274 vs 243 ms, P < 0.001). Furthermore, athletes showed an earlier stimulus-locked peak activation of MT (200 vs 182 ms, P = 0.002) and BA6 (161 vs 137 ms, P = 0.009). Response-locked peak activation in MT was later in athletes (-7 vs 26 ms, P < 0.001), whereas no group differences were observed in BA6 and BA4. Multiple regression analyses with stimulus- and response-locked cortical potentials predicted EMG onset (r = 0.83) and VMRT (r = 0.77).
The athletes' superior visuomotor performance in response to visual motion is primarily related to visual perception and, to a minor degree, to motor-related processes.
参加球类或球拍类运动的运动员必须在极短的时间压力下对视觉刺激做出反应。以往的研究使用视觉对比刺激来确定运动员和非运动员的视觉感知和视觉运动反应;然而,球类和球拍类运动的特点是运动而非对比视觉线索。由于视觉对比和运动信号在不同的皮质区域进行处理,本研究旨在确定运动员和非运动员在视觉运动感知和处理方面的差异。
25名熟练的羽毛球运动员和28名年龄匹配的非运动员对照组参与了本研究。使用64通道脑电图系统,我们研究了运动敏感的颞中(MT)皮质区域对不同速度的径向运动的视觉运动感知/处理。在一个简单的视觉运动反应任务中,研究了布罗德曼6区(BA6)和BA4区的视觉运动转换以及肌肉激活(肌电图起始)和视觉运动反应时间(VMRT)。确定刺激锁定和反应锁定电位以区分感知和运动相关过程。
与非运动员相比,运动员的肌电图起始时间更早(217对178毫秒,P<0.001),同时VMRT更快(274对243毫秒,P<0.001)。此外,运动员的MT区刺激锁定峰值激活更早(200对182毫秒,P = 0.002)和BA6区(161对137毫秒,P = 0.009)。运动员MT区的反应锁定峰值激活较晚(-7对26毫秒,P<0.001),而BA6和BA4区未观察到组间差异。对刺激锁定和反应锁定皮质电位进行的多元回归分析预测了肌电图起始(r = 0.83)和VMRT(r = 0.77)。
运动员对视觉运动的卓越视觉运动表现主要与视觉感知有关,在较小程度上与运动相关过程有关。