Suppr超能文献

全球范围内,结直肠癌筛查规划中存在社会经济和种族不平等现象。

Socioeconomic and ethnic inequities within organised colorectal cancer screening programmes worldwide.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.

出版信息

Gut. 2018 Apr;67(4):679-687. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313311. Epub 2017 Jan 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes can reduce CRC mortality. However, the implementation of a screening programme may create or exacerbate socioeconomic and ethnic health inequities if participation varies by subgroup. We determined which organised programmes characterise participation inequities by socioeconomic and ethnic subgroups, and assessed the variation in subgroup participation among programmes collecting group-specific data.

DESIGN

Employing a literature review and survey among leaders of national or regional screening programmes, this study identified published and unpublished data on participation by socioeconomic status and ethnicity. We assessed programmes offering faecal occult blood tests (FOBT) for screening. Primary outcome was screening participation rate.

RESULTS

Across 24 organised FOBT-screening programmes meeting the inclusion criteria, participation rates ranged from 21% to 73%. Most programmes (13/24, 54%) did not collect data on participation by socioeconomic status and ethnicity. Among the 11 programmes with data on participation by socioeconomic status, 90% (28/31 publications) reported lower participation among lower socioeconomic groups. Differences across socioeconomic gradients were moderate (66% vs 71%) to severe (35% vs 61%). Only six programmes reported participation results by ethnicity. Ethnic differences were moderate, though only limited data were available for evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Across organised CRC screening programmes worldwide, variation in participation by socioeconomic status and ethnicity is often not assessed. However, when measured, marked disparities in participation by socioeconomic status have been observed. Limited data were available to assess inequities by ethnicity. To avoid exacerbating health inequities, screening programmes should systematically monitor participation by socioeconomic status and ethnicity, and investigate and address determinants of low participation.

摘要

目的

结直肠癌(CRC)筛查计划可以降低 CRC 死亡率。然而,如果参与度因亚组而异,那么筛查计划的实施可能会造成或加剧社会经济和种族健康的不平等。我们确定了哪些有组织的计划通过社会经济和种族亚组来体现参与的不平等,并评估了收集特定群体数据的计划中亚组参与的差异。

设计

通过对国家或地区筛查计划的领导者进行文献回顾和调查,本研究确定了发表和未发表的关于社会经济地位和种族参与情况的数据。我们评估了提供粪便潜血试验(FOBT)进行筛查的计划。主要结果是筛查参与率。

结果

在符合纳入标准的 24 个有组织的 FOBT 筛查计划中,参与率从 21%到 73%不等。大多数计划(24 个中的 13 个,54%)没有收集社会经济地位和种族参与情况的数据。在 11 个有社会经济地位参与数据的计划中,90%(28/31 篇出版物)报告较低社会经济群体的参与度较低。社会经济梯度之间的差异中等(66%对 71%)到严重(35%对 61%)。只有六个计划报告了种族参与结果。种族差异中等,但可用于评估的数据有限。

结论

在全球有组织的 CRC 筛查计划中,社会经济地位和种族参与的差异通常没有得到评估。然而,在进行衡量时,社会经济地位的参与差异明显。可用于评估种族不平等的数据有限。为了避免加剧健康不平等,筛查计划应系统地监测社会经济地位和种族的参与情况,并调查和解决低参与率的决定因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验