• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

做出最佳决策——BESTa项目:瑞典癌症筛查数字决策辅助工具开发中设计阶段和阿尔法阶段的描述

Making the BEST Decision-the BESTa Project: Description of the Design and Alpha Phases as Part of the Development of a Digital Decision Aid for Cancer Screening in Sweden.

作者信息

Fritzell Kaisa, Wangmar Johanna, Hedberg Berith, Woudstra Anke, Forsberg Anna, Kottorp Anders, Franklin Karl A, Jervaeus Anna

机构信息

Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, 141 52, Huddinge, Sweden.

Theme Cancer, Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2025 Apr 26. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02633-y.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-025-02633-y
PMID:40285812
Abstract

A digital decision aid for cancer screening can gather balanced information in one place and give individuals the opportunity to elucidate their knowledge, values and engage in shared decision-making. Research shows that ethnic minorities and individuals with various functional limitations participate in cancer screening to a lower extent, hence our ambition to make the decision aid as available and applicable as possible, regardless of end-users' traits. The aim was to describe the design and alpha phases of the development of a digital decision aid for CRC screening and tentative end-users' perceptions. Based on a scientific framework for development of decision aids, participants were recruited through multiple channels. The decision aid was evaluated in two steps, a paper version (design phase) and a website prototype (alpha phase), using the think-aloud approach. Data were rich with detailed suggestions for improvements of the decision aid and how it was perceived. A positive outlook on the decision aid was common. Certain words, wordings or visual features were considered difficult and worry or anxiety, related to the content, were expressed. The variation in the findings illustrates the challenges of decision aid development. Still, our findings emphasise the importance of designing a decision aid in co-creation with its end-users. Developing a digital decision aid is complex, why a well-established framework is essential. With the goal of an equal healthcare system, the inclusion of individuals with diverse backgrounds and functional limitations should not only be a fundamental aspect of all research, but a prerequisite.

摘要

一种用于癌症筛查的数字决策辅助工具可以在一个地方收集全面的信息,并让个人有机会阐明自己的知识、价值观,参与共同决策。研究表明,少数族裔和有各种功能障碍的个体参与癌症筛查的程度较低,因此我们的目标是让决策辅助工具尽可能易于获取和应用,无论最终用户的特征如何。目的是描述用于结直肠癌筛查的数字决策辅助工具开发的设计和阿尔法阶段,以及潜在最终用户的看法。基于决策辅助工具开发的科学框架,通过多种渠道招募参与者。使用出声思考法分两步对决策辅助工具进行评估,第一步是纸质版(设计阶段),第二步是网站原型(阿尔法阶段)。数据丰富,包含了对决策辅助工具改进的详细建议以及对其的看法。对决策辅助工具持积极态度很常见。某些词汇、措辞或视觉特征被认为难以理解,并且有人表达了与内容相关的担忧或焦虑。研究结果的差异说明了决策辅助工具开发的挑战。尽管如此,我们的研究结果强调了与最终用户共同创建决策辅助工具的重要性。开发数字决策辅助工具很复杂,因此完善的框架至关重要。为了实现平等的医疗保健系统,纳入具有不同背景和功能障碍的个体不仅应该是所有研究的基本方面,而且是一个先决条件。

相似文献

1
Making the BEST Decision-the BESTa Project: Description of the Design and Alpha Phases as Part of the Development of a Digital Decision Aid for Cancer Screening in Sweden.做出最佳决策——BESTa项目:瑞典癌症筛查数字决策辅助工具开发中设计阶段和阿尔法阶段的描述
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Apr 26. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02633-y.
2
Making the BEST decision-the BESTa project development, implementation and evaluation of a digital Decision Aid in Swedish cancer screening programmes- a description of a research project.制定最佳决策—— BESTa 项目:在瑞典癌症筛查计划中开发、实施和评估数字决策辅助工具——一个研究项目的描述。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 12;18(12):e0294332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294332. eCollection 2023.
3
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
4
High Users of Healthcare Services: Development and Alpha Testing of a Patient Decision Aid for Case Management.高医疗服务使用者:病例管理患者决策辅助工具的开发和α测试。
Patient. 2020 Dec;13(6):757-766. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00465-0. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
5
Development of a decision guide to support the elderly in decision making about location of care: an iterative, user-centered design.制定一项决策指南,以支持老年人在护理地点决策方面的决策:一种迭代的、以用户为中心的设计。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Jul 19;2:26. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0040-0. eCollection 2016.
6
A Decision Aid Intervention for Family Building After Cancer: Developmental Study on the Initial Steps to Consider When Designing a Web-Based Prototype.一种癌症后生育决策辅助干预措施:基于网络原型设计时需考虑的初始步骤的发展性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Jan 22;5(1):e20841. doi: 10.2196/20841.
7
Development of a decision aid to support colorectal cancer screening: perspectives of Asians in an endemic urban community-a qualitative research study.制定决策辅助工具以支持结直肠癌筛查:在一个高发城市社区中亚洲人群的观点——一项定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Mar 6;21(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01404-1.
8
Developing a Self-Administered Decision Aid for Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Tailored to Citizens With Lower Educational Attainment: Qualitative Study.为受教育程度较低的公民量身定制基于粪便免疫化学检测的结直肠癌筛查自我管理决策辅助工具:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2018 May 22;2(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/formative.9696.
9
PROSHADE Protocol: Designing and Evaluating a Decision Aid for Promoting Shared Decision Making in Opportunistic Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Mix-Method Study.PROSHADE 方案:设计和评估一种决策辅助工具以促进机会性前列腺癌筛查中的共享决策:一项混合方法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 22;19(15):8904. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19158904.
10
Patient decision aid based on multi-criteria decision analysis for disease-modifying drugs for multiple sclerosis: prototype development.基于多准则决策分析的多发性硬化症疾病修正治疗药物患者决策辅助工具:原型开发。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Apr 9;21(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01479-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Routine Fecal Occult Blood Screening and Colorectal Cancer Mortality in Sweden.瑞典常规粪便潜血筛查与结直肠癌死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e240516. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0516.
2
Would shared decision-making be useful in breast cancer screening programmes? A qualitative study using focus group discussions to gather evidence from French women with different socioeconomic backgrounds.在乳腺癌筛查项目中,共同决策是否有用?一项使用焦点小组讨论从具有不同社会经济背景的法国女性中收集证据的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 7;24(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17876-5.
3
Making the BEST decision-the BESTa project development, implementation and evaluation of a digital Decision Aid in Swedish cancer screening programmes- a description of a research project.
制定最佳决策—— BESTa 项目:在瑞典癌症筛查计划中开发、实施和评估数字决策辅助工具——一个研究项目的描述。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 12;18(12):e0294332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294332. eCollection 2023.
4
Reducing disparities and achieving health equity in colorectal cancer screening.缩小结直肠癌筛查中的差距并实现健康公平。
Tech Innov Gastrointest Endosc. 2023;25(3):284-296. doi: 10.1016/j.tige.2023.02.007. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
5
Racial and Ethnic Inequities in US Oncology Clinical Trial Participation From 2017 to 2022.2017 年至 2022 年美国肿瘤学临床试验参与中的种族和民族不平等。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2322515. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.22515.
6
Breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of a decision aid on mammography screening uptake: study protocol.乳腺癌:一项评估决策辅助工具对乳房X光检查筛查接受率影响的随机对照试验:研究方案。
Front Oncol. 2023 Apr 24;13:1128467. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1128467. eCollection 2023.
7
Factors influencing organised faecal occult blood test screening participation in culturally and linguistically diverse populations: a scoping review.影响文化和语言多样化人群参与有组织粪便潜血试验筛查的因素:范围综述。
Public Health. 2023 Jun;219:67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.03.022. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
8
Global burden of colorectal cancer in 2020 and 2040: incidence and mortality estimates from GLOBOCAN.2020年和2040年全球结直肠癌负担:来自全球癌症负担(GLOBOCAN)的发病率和死亡率估计
Gut. 2023 Feb;72(2):338-344. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327736. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
9
Different information needs-The major reasons for calling the helpline when invited to colorectal cancer screening.不同的信息需求-受邀参加结直肠癌筛查时拨打热线的主要原因。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1548-1554. doi: 10.1111/hex.13496. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
10
A systematic review of the barriers and facilitators influencing the cancer screening behaviour among people with intellectual disabilities.一项系统评价:影响智障人士癌症筛查行为的障碍和促进因素。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2022 Feb;76:102084. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.102084. Epub 2021 Dec 15.