• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
"You're dealing with the bottom here…" understanding reasons for reduced utilisation: a qualitative study on colorectal cancer screening among vulnerable men at a drop-in centre in Denmark.“你得从底层做起……”理解利用率降低的原因:丹麦一家收容所中弱势群体男性接受结直肠癌筛查的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 30;24(1):3012. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20496-8.
2
Barriers and facilitators of implementing a multicomponent intervention to improve faecal immunochemical test (FIT) colorectal cancer screening in primary care clinics, Alberta.在艾伯塔省的基层医疗诊所实施多组分干预措施以改善粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)结直肠癌筛查的障碍和促进因素。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 May 27;13(2):e002686. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002686.
3
Impact of gender on decisions to participate in faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study.性别对基于粪便免疫化学检测的结直肠癌筛查参与决策的影响:一项定性研究
Psychooncology. 2016 Dec;25(12):1456-1462. doi: 10.1002/pon.4085. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
4
"We're the very bottom, so it's going to be hard for you to 'catch any fish' around here…" understanding vulnerable Greenlanders' perspectives on cancer and barriers to screening in Denmark- A qualitative study.“我们是最底层的人,所以在这里你很难‘钓到鱼’……” 理解脆弱的格陵兰人对癌症的看法以及在丹麦进行筛查的障碍 - 一项定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Jan 22;23(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02094-7.
5
Differential effects of colorectal cancer screening across sociodemographic groups in Denmark: a register-based study.丹麦不同社会人口学群体中结直肠癌筛查的差异效应:一项基于登记处的研究。
Acta Oncol. 2021 Mar;60(3):323-332. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1869829. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
6
Perceptions about cancer and barriers towards cancer screening among ethnic minority women in a deprived area in Denmark - a qualitative study.丹麦贫困地区少数民族女性对癌症的认知及癌症筛查障碍 - 一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 12;20(1):921. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09037-1.
7
Barriers and facilitators to participate in the colorectal cancer screening programme in Flanders (Belgium): a focus group study.参与佛兰德(比利时)结直肠癌筛查计划的障碍和促进因素:一项焦点小组研究。
Acta Clin Belg. 2022 Feb;77(1):37-44. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2020.1783906. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
8
What are the barriers towards cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women? A qualitative comparative analysis of stakeholder perspectives in seven European countries.弱势女性进行宫颈癌筛查的障碍有哪些?来自七个欧洲国家利益相关者观点的定性比较分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 17;14(5):e079921. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079921.
9
Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Detecting Earlier-Stage Disease-A Nationwide Cohort Study in Denmark.丹麦全国队列研究:结直肠癌筛查对检出早期疾病的效果。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Jul;155(1):99-106. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.03.062. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
10
The Intention and Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening after a Brief Health Education Program in a Malaysian Primary Care Setting: A Population-Based Study.马来西亚初级医疗保健环境下,简短健康教育计划后对结直肠癌筛查的意向和接受度:一项基于人群的研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Nov 1;22(11):3475-3482. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.11.3475.

本文引用的文献

1
The relative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening to detect adenomas and cancer in different demographic and socioeconomic groups. A nationwide cohort study.基于粪便免疫化学检测的结直肠癌筛查在不同人口统计学和社会经济群体中检测腺瘤和癌症的相对有效性。一项全国性队列研究。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2022 Nov 1;31(6):489-496. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000735. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
2
The European cancer burden in 2020: Incidence and mortality estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers.2020 年欧洲癌症负担:40 个国家和 25 种主要癌症的发病率和死亡率估计。
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Nov;157:308-347. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.07.039. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
3
Framework and Strategies to Eliminate Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Outcomes.消除结直肠癌筛查结果差异的框架和策略。
Annu Rev Med. 2021 Jan 27;72:383-398. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-051619-035840. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
4
Inequalities in participation in colorectal cancer screening programmes: a systematic review.参与结直肠癌筛查计划的不平等现象:系统评价。
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Jun 1;30(3):416-425. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz236.
5
Social determinants of colorectal cancer risk, stage, and survival: a systematic review.结直肠癌风险、分期和生存的社会决定因素:系统评价。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jun;35(6):985-995. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03585-z. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
6
Do socioeconomic factors play a role in nonadherence to follow-up colonoscopy after a positive faecal immunochemical test in the Flemish colorectal cancer screening programme?社会经济因素是否在弗拉芒结直肠癌筛查计划中阳性粪便免疫化学试验后不遵医嘱进行结肠镜随访中起作用?
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2020 Mar;29(2):119-126. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000533.
7
The Danish health care system and epidemiological research: from health care contacts to database records.丹麦医疗保健系统与流行病学研究:从医疗保健接触到数据库记录。
Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 12;11:563-591. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S179083. eCollection 2019.
8
Changes in colorectal cancer incidence in seven high-income countries: a population-based study.七国高发地区结直肠癌发病率变化:基于人群的研究。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jul;4(7):511-518. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30147-5. Epub 2019 May 16.
9
Cancer survival data emphasise importance of early diagnosis.癌症生存数据凸显了早期诊断的重要性。
BMJ. 2019 Jan 25;364:l408. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l408.
10
Three years of colorectal cancer screening in Denmark.丹麦的三年结直肠癌筛查。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2018 Dec;57:39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Oct 4.

“你得从底层做起……”理解利用率降低的原因:丹麦一家收容所中弱势群体男性接受结直肠癌筛查的定性研究。

"You're dealing with the bottom here…" understanding reasons for reduced utilisation: a qualitative study on colorectal cancer screening among vulnerable men at a drop-in centre in Denmark.

机构信息

Department of Public Health Programmes, University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 30;24(1):3012. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20496-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-024-20496-8
PMID:39478487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11526529/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening can reduce both CRC incidence and mortality, and faecal immunochemical testing (FIT)-based screening programmes are therefore now being implemented in many countries. However, social inequality in FIT-based screening participation is well documented, and initiatives to address this challenge are understudied. We explored the perceptions of CRC screening and the perceived barriers and facilitators towards FIT-based CRC screening among men visiting a drop-in centre for people with severe social problems in Denmark.

METHODS

The study was a qualitative interview study. Participants were sixteen men visiting a drop-in centre in Denmark. A local staff member provided supplementary information and assisted with the recruitment process. The interviews were transcribed verbatim, followed by an inductive content analysis.

RESULTS

The men were often dealing with health and social problems, and they often had low self-esteem. At first, they stated that they did not think much about cancer and their own risk of being diagnosed with it. They argued that they had little time, energy, and resources to participating in, for example, CRC screening programmes, and barriers to participating were facts of life such as comorbidity and cognitive difficulties. Further, they were not sure how to participate, and some misunderstood the concept of screening. However, during the interviews, the main part of the participants became very keen to participate, and they suggested that in the future, they could receive regular information about cancer screening in face-to-face interactions with someone who cared and was interested in helping them.

CONCLUSION

Men in a vulnerable position visiting a drop-in centre were interested in CRC screening. If we intervene in a way that meets the needs among these vulnerable citizens, it may contribute to reducing social inequality in FIT-based CRC screening programmes.

摘要

背景

结直肠癌(CRC)筛查可以降低 CRC 的发病率和死亡率,因此现在许多国家都在实施基于粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)的筛查计划。然而,基于 FIT 的筛查参与存在社会不平等,针对这一挑战的举措研究不足。我们探讨了在丹麦一个为有严重社会问题的人提供服务的临时收容中心就诊的男性对 CRC 筛查的看法,以及他们对基于 FIT 的 CRC 筛查的感知障碍和促进因素。

方法

本研究是一项定性访谈研究。参与者是 16 名在丹麦一个临时收容中心就诊的男性。一名当地工作人员提供了补充信息,并协助了招募过程。访谈内容逐字转录,然后进行了归纳内容分析。

结果

这些男性经常面临健康和社会问题,他们的自尊心通常较低。起初,他们表示,他们对癌症和自己患癌的风险没有太多考虑。他们认为,他们没有时间、精力和资源去参与例如 CRC 筛查计划,并且参与的障碍是生活中的事实,例如合并症和认知困难。此外,他们不确定如何参与,并且有些人误解了筛查的概念。然而,在访谈过程中,参与者的主要部分变得非常热衷于参与,他们建议在未来,他们可以通过与关心和有兴趣帮助他们的人进行面对面的互动,定期获得有关癌症筛查的信息。

结论

在临时收容中心就诊的弱势男性对 CRC 筛查感兴趣。如果我们以满足这些弱势公民需求的方式进行干预,可能有助于减少基于 FIT 的 CRC 筛查计划中的社会不平等。