• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用实践操作技术降低产科括约肌损伤的发生率:一项干预性质量改进项目。

Reducing the incidence of Obstetric Sphincter Injuries using a hands-on technique: an interventional quality improvement project.

作者信息

Rasmussen Ole Bredahl, Yding Annika, Anh Ø Jacob, Sander Andersen Charlotte, Boris Jane

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospitalsenheden Vest, Herning, Denmark.

Centre of Diagnostic Investigation, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016 Dec 19;5(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u217936.w7106. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1136/bmjquality.u217936.w7106
PMID:28074131
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5174806/
Abstract

A main concern for women giving birth is the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries. In our department the incidence of sphincter injuries was around 8 % among vaginally delivering first time mothers. We aimed to halve the incidence to 4 % or less. A prospective interventional program was instituted. We implemented a hands-on technique with four elements in a bundle of care together with a certification process for all staff on the delivery ward. The incidence of episiotomies served as a balancing indicator. The adherence to three of the four elements of the care bundle rose significantly while the all-or-nothing indicator leveled around 80 %. The median number of deliveries between cases with a sphincter injury increased from 9.5 in the baseline period to 20 during the intervention period. This corresponded with a reduction in the incidence from 7.0 % to 3.4 %. The rate of episiotomy remained low at 8.4 % in this group. By implementing the hands-on technique, we halved the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Our data suggest that further improvement may be anticipated. The study has demonstrated how implementation of a hands-on technique can be carried out within a quality improvement framework with rapid and sustainable results.

摘要

分娩女性主要关心的问题之一是产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险。在我们科室,首次经阴道分娩的产妇中括约肌损伤的发生率约为8%。我们的目标是将发生率减半至4%或更低。为此制定了一项前瞻性干预计划。我们实施了一项包含四个要素的实践技术,并将其纳入一系列护理措施中,同时对产房所有工作人员进行认证。会阴切开术的发生率作为一个平衡指标。四项护理要素中的三项要素的依从性显著提高,而全或无指标稳定在80%左右。括约肌损伤病例之间的分娩中位数从基线期的9.5例增加到干预期的20例。这相应地使发生率从7.0%降至3.4%。该组会阴切开术的发生率仍较低,为8.4%。通过实施该实践技术,我们将产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险减半。我们的数据表明有望进一步改善。该研究表明了如何在质量改进框架内实施实践技术并取得快速且可持续的成果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddca/5174806/13689d6979db/bmjqiru217936w7106f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddca/5174806/05621f1a6660/bmjqiru217936w7106f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddca/5174806/e4dbab600c9a/bmjqiru217936w7106f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddca/5174806/13689d6979db/bmjqiru217936w7106f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddca/5174806/05621f1a6660/bmjqiru217936w7106f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddca/5174806/e4dbab600c9a/bmjqiru217936w7106f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddca/5174806/13689d6979db/bmjqiru217936w7106f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Reducing the incidence of Obstetric Sphincter Injuries using a hands-on technique: an interventional quality improvement project.采用实践操作技术降低产科括约肌损伤的发生率:一项干预性质量改进项目。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016 Dec 19;5(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u217936.w7106. eCollection 2016.
2
Importance of Individual Elements for Perineal Protection in Childbirth: An Interventional, Prospective Trial.分娩时会阴保护中个体因素的重要性:一项干预性前瞻性试验
AJP Rep. 2018 Oct;8(4):e289-e294. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675352. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
3
Comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women before and after introduction of the EPISCISSORS-60(®) at two hospitals in the United Kingdom.英国两家医院引入EPISCISSORS-60(®)前后未生育女性产科肛门括约肌损伤情况的比较
Int J Womens Health. 2015 Dec 9;7:949-55. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S94680. eCollection 2015.
4
The use of Episcissors-60 to reduce the rate of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries: A systematic review.使用 Episcissors-60 降低产科肛门括约肌损伤率:系统评价。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Jun;237:23-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
5
Could a mediolateral episiotomy prevent obstetric anal sphincter injury?会阴正中切开术能否预防产科肛门括约肌损伤?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Jun;150(2):142-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
6
Multidisciplinary training in perineal care during labor and delivery for the reduction of anal sphincter injuries.分娩期间会阴护理的多学科培训以减少肛门括约肌损伤。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Aug;134(2):177-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.12.011. Epub 2016 May 4.
7
The impact of an intervention programme employing a hands-on technique to reduce the incidence of anal sphincter tears: interrupted time-series reanalysis.采用实操技术干预方案减少肛门括约肌撕裂发生率的效果:中断时间序列再分析。
BMJ Open. 2013 Oct 22;3(10):e003355. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003355.
8
Episiotomy use among vaginal deliveries and the association with anal sphincter injury: a population-based retrospective cohort study.会阴切开术在阴道分娩中的应用及其与肛门括约肌损伤的关系:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
CMAJ. 2019 Oct 21;191(42):E1149-E1158. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.190366.
9
Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study.产科肛门括约肌损伤的危险因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Birth. 2006 Jun;33(2):117-22. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.00088.x.
10
Implementation of the RCOG guidelines for prevention of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) at two London Hospitals: A time series analysis.伦敦两家医院实施皇家妇产科医师学院预防产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS)指南:一项时间序列分析。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 May;224:89-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.03.021. Epub 2018 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term Results after Early Secondary Repair of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: A Case Series and Literature Review.产科肛门括约肌损伤早期二次修复后的长期结果:病例系列及文献综述
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Feb 20. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06081-6.
2
Which elements were significant in reducing obstetric anal sphincter injury? A prospective follow-up study.哪些因素在降低产科肛门括约肌损伤方面具有重要意义?一项前瞻性随访研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Nov 18;21(1):781. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04260-z.
3
The OASI care bundle quality improvement project: lessons learned and future direction.

本文引用的文献

1
Manual protection of the perineum reduces the risk of obstetric anal sphincter ruptures.会阴手动保护可降低产科肛门括约肌破裂的风险。
Dan Med J. 2015 May;62(5).
2
Severe perineal trauma is rising, but let us not overreact.严重会阴创伤的发生率正在上升,但我们不要反应过度。
Midwifery. 2015 Jan;31(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
3
Run charts revisited: a simulation study of run chart rules for detection of non-random variation in health care processes.重温控制图:一项关于用于检测医疗保健过程中非随机变异的控制图规则的模拟研究。
OASI 护理捆绑包质量改进项目:经验教训和未来方向。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jul;32(7):1989-1995. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04786-y. Epub 2021 May 14.
4
Women's experiences of the OASI Care Bundle; a package of care to reduce severe perineal trauma.女性对 OASI 护理包的体验;减少严重会阴创伤的护理包。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jul;32(7):1807-1816. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04653-2. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
5
Impact of a quality improvement project to reduce the rate of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a multicentre study with a stepped-wedge design.质量改进项目对降低产科肛门括约肌损伤率的影响:一项采用多中心、阶梯式设计的研究。
BJOG. 2021 Feb;128(3):584-592. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16396. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
6
Exploring clinicians' perspectives on the 'Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Care Bundle' national quality improvement programme: a qualitative study.探索临床医生对“产科肛门括约肌损伤护理包”国家质量改进计划的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 9;10(9):e035674. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035674.
7
Impact of electronic and blended learning programs for manual perineal support on incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a prospective interventional study.电子和混合学习方案对经产妇行会阴手支撑减少产科肛门括约肌损伤发生率的影响:一项前瞻性干预性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Nov 12;18(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1363-3.
8
Importance of Individual Elements for Perineal Protection in Childbirth: An Interventional, Prospective Trial.分娩时会阴保护中个体因素的重要性:一项干预性前瞻性试验
AJP Rep. 2018 Oct;8(4):e289-e294. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675352. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
9
A multi-centre quality improvement project to reduce the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): study protocol.一项旨在降低产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)发生率的多中心质量改进项目:研究方案。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Aug 13;18(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1965-0.
10
Impact of animated instruction on tablets and hands-on training in applying bimanual perineal support on episiotomy rates: an intervention study.平板电脑动画指导及双手会阴支撑应用的实践培训对会阴侧切率的影响:一项干预性研究
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Aug;30(8):1343-1350. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3711-6. Epub 2018 Jul 14.
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 25;9(11):e113825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113825. eCollection 2014.
4
National survey of perineal trauma and its subsequent management in the United Kingdom.英国会阴创伤及其后续处理的全国性调查。
Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Dec;25(12):1621-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2406-x. Epub 2014 May 16.
5
Methods of repair for obstetric anal sphincter injury.产科肛门括约肌损伤的修复方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 8;2013(12):CD002866. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002866.pub3.
6
Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after training to protect the perineum: cohort study.会阴保护训练后产科肛门括约肌损伤的发生率:队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2012 Oct 17;2(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001649. Print 2012.
7
Are obstetric anal sphincter ruptures preventable?-- large and consistent rupture rate variations between the Nordic countries and between delivery units in Norway.产科肛门括约肌撕裂是否可以预防?——北欧国家之间以及挪威各分娩单位之间的撕裂发生率存在较大且一致的差异。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Jan;92(1):94-100. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12024. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
8
Hands on or hands off the perineum: a survey of care of the perineum in labour (HOOPS).会阴护理:干预还是不干预——产时会阴护理调查(HOOPS)
Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Oct;22(10):1279-85. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1454-8. Epub 2011 May 25.
9
A multicenter interventional program to reduce the incidence of anal sphincter tears.多中心干预项目降低肛门括约肌撕裂发生率。
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;116(4):901-908. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eda77a.
10
Vaginal delivery compared with elective caesarean section: the views of pregnant women and clinicians.阴道分娩与选择性剖宫产的比较:孕妇和临床医生的观点
BJOG. 2008 Nov;115(12):1494-502. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01892.x. Epub 2008 Aug 25.