• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用实操技术干预方案减少肛门括约肌撕裂发生率的效果:中断时间序列再分析。

The impact of an intervention programme employing a hands-on technique to reduce the incidence of anal sphincter tears: interrupted time-series reanalysis.

机构信息

Global Health Unit, Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2013 Oct 22;3(10):e003355. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003355.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003355
PMID:24154515
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3808759/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To re-evaluate previously published findings from an uncontrolled before-after evaluation of an intervention programme to reduce the incidence of anal sphincter tears. A key component of the programme was the use of a hands-on technique where the birth attendant presses the neonate's head during the final stage of delivery while simultaneously supporting the woman's perineum with the other hand.

DESIGN

Interrupted time-series analysis using segmented regression modelling.

SETTING

Obstetric departments of five Norwegian hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

All women giving births vaginally in the study hospitals, 2002-2008.

METHODS

The main data source was the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. We estimated the change in incidence of anal sphincter tears before and after implementation of the intervention in the five intervention hospitals, taking into account the trends in incidence before and after implementation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of anal sphincter tears and episiotomies.

RESULTS

There were 75 543 registered births at the five included hospitals. We found a 2% absolute reduction in incidence of anal sphincter tears associated with the hospital intervention programme, representing almost a halving in the number of women experiencing serious anal sphincter tears. This is a substantially smaller estimate than previously reported. However, it does represent a highly significant decrease in anal sphincter injuries. The programme was also associated with a significant increase in episiotomies.

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention programme was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter tears. Still, the findings should be interpreted with caution as they seem to contradict the findings from randomised controlled studies of similar interventions.

摘要

目的

重新评估一项干预计划的无对照前后评估的先前发表的结果,该计划旨在降低肛门括约肌撕裂的发生率。该计划的一个关键组成部分是使用一种实际操作技术,即助产妇在分娩的最后阶段按压新生儿的头部,同时用另一只手支撑女性的会阴。

设计

使用分段回归模型进行中断时间序列分析。

设置

挪威五家医院的产科病房。

参与者

2002 年至 2008 年期间在研究医院自然分娩的所有女性。

方法

主要数据来源是挪威医学出生登记处。我们估计了干预实施前后五个干预医院肛门括约肌撕裂发生率的变化,同时考虑了干预实施前后的发生率趋势。

主要结果测量

肛门括约肌撕裂和会阴切开术的发生率。

结果

在纳入的五家医院中有 75543 例注册分娩。我们发现与医院干预计划相关的肛门括约肌撕裂发生率绝对降低了 2%,这意味着经历严重肛门括约肌撕裂的女性人数几乎减少了一半。这一估计值明显小于先前报道的结果。然而,这确实代表了肛门括约肌损伤的显著减少。该计划还与会阴切开术的显著增加有关。

结论

干预计划与产科肛门括约肌撕裂发生率的显著降低相关。尽管如此,由于它们似乎与类似干预的随机对照研究的结果相矛盾,因此应谨慎解释这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fbb/3808759/7c9d02a760c8/bmjopen2013003355f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fbb/3808759/e805ae572a89/bmjopen2013003355f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fbb/3808759/5db15132b114/bmjopen2013003355f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fbb/3808759/7c9d02a760c8/bmjopen2013003355f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fbb/3808759/e805ae572a89/bmjopen2013003355f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fbb/3808759/5db15132b114/bmjopen2013003355f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fbb/3808759/7c9d02a760c8/bmjopen2013003355f03.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of an intervention programme employing a hands-on technique to reduce the incidence of anal sphincter tears: interrupted time-series reanalysis.采用实操技术干预方案减少肛门括约肌撕裂发生率的效果:中断时间序列再分析。
BMJ Open. 2013 Oct 22;3(10):e003355. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003355.
2
A multicenter interventional program to reduce the incidence of anal sphincter tears.多中心干预项目降低肛门括约肌撕裂发生率。
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;116(4):901-908. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eda77a.
3
Use of endoanal ultrasound for reducing the risk of complications related to anal sphincter injury after vaginal birth.使用经肛门超声降低阴道分娩后肛门括约肌损伤相关并发症的风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 29;2015(10):CD010826. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010826.pub2.
4
Changing incidence of anal sphincter tears in four Nordic countries through the last decades.过去几十年间,四个北欧国家肛门括约肌撕裂的发病率变化情况。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Sep;146(1):71-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.04.033. Epub 2009 May 30.
5
Anal sphincter tears at spontaneous delivery: a comparison of five hospitals in Norway.自然分娩时的肛门括约肌撕裂:挪威五家医院的比较
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(11):1176-80. doi: 10.1080/00016340802460354.
6
Decreasing the incidence of anal sphincter tears during delivery.降低分娩过程中肛门括约肌撕裂的发生率。
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;111(5):1053-7. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816c4402.
7
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries - review of our date between 2015-2017.产科肛门括约肌损伤——我们2015年至2017年数据的回顾。
Ceska Gynekol. 2019 Winter;84(1):18-22.
8
Effects of an intervention program for reducing severe perineal trauma during the second stage of labor.干预方案对减少第二产程中严重会阴创伤的影响。
Birth. 2019 Jun;46(2):371-378. doi: 10.1111/birt.12409. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
9
Implementation of the RCOG guidelines for prevention of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) at two London Hospitals: A time series analysis.伦敦两家医院实施皇家妇产科医师学院预防产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS)指南:一项时间序列分析。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 May;224:89-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.03.021. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
10
Can the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injury be reduced? The STOMP experience.产科肛门括约肌损伤的发生率能降低吗?STOMP研究经验。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Jul;202:55-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.04.033. Epub 2016 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of education and training programmes to help clinicians assess and classify perineal tears: a systematic review.帮助临床医生评估和分类会阴撕裂的教育培训项目的有效性:一项系统综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 25;15(6):e095961. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095961.
2
Midwives' approach to the prevention and repair of obstetric perineal trauma in Spain.西班牙助产士预防和修复产科会阴创伤的方法。
Nurs Open. 2024 Apr;11(4):e2160. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2160.
3
Variability of clinical practice in the care of the second stage of labor among midwives in Spain.

本文引用的文献

1
Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma.第二产程中减少会阴创伤的会阴技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7(12):CD006672. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006672.pub2.
2
Use of manual techniques for perineal support in Norwegian maternity departments.挪威产科病房中会阴支撑手法的应用。
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2011 Nov 29;131(23):2352-4. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.11.0643.
3
A multicenter interventional program to reduce the incidence of anal sphincter tears.多中心干预项目降低肛门括约肌撕裂发生率。
西班牙助产士在第二产程护理中的临床实践差异。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Mar 26;23(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01863-7.
4
Which elements were significant in reducing obstetric anal sphincter injury? A prospective follow-up study.哪些因素在降低产科肛门括约肌损伤方面具有重要意义?一项前瞻性随访研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Nov 18;21(1):781. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04260-z.
5
Impact of animated instruction on tablets and hands-on training in applying bimanual perineal support on episiotomy rates: an intervention study.平板电脑动画指导及双手会阴支撑应用的实践培训对会阴侧切率的影响:一项干预性研究
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Aug;30(8):1343-1350. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3711-6. Epub 2018 Jul 14.
6
Fetal head size and effect of manual perineal protection.胎儿头部大小与手法会阴保护的效果
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 29;12(12):e0189842. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189842. eCollection 2017.
7
Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIs) in Israel: A Review of the Incidence and Risk Factors.以色列的产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIs):发病率及风险因素综述
Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2017 Apr 28;8(2):e0018. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10295.
8
A retrospective study on perineal lacerations in vaginal delivery and the individual performance of experienced mifwives.阴道分娩会阴裂伤及经验丰富助产士个人表现的回顾性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Oct 22;15:270. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0703-0.
9
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: review of anatomical factors and modifiable second stage interventions.产科肛门括约肌损伤:解剖学因素及可改变的第二产程干预措施综述
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Dec;26(12):1725-34. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2747-0. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;116(4):901-908. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eda77a.
4
Trends in risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in Norway.挪威产科肛门括约肌损伤危险因素的变化趋势。
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jul;116(1):25-34. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e2f50b.
5
SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed policymaking in health 18: Planning monitoring and evaluation of policies.支持健康政策制定的循证决策工具 18:政策的规划、监测和评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2009 Dec 16;7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S18. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S18.
6
Episiotomy for vaginal birth.经阴道分娩时行会阴切开术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21(1):CD000081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub2.
7
Decreasing the incidence of anal sphincter tears during delivery.降低分娩过程中肛门括约肌撕裂的发生率。
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;111(5):1053-7. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816c4402.
8
Obstetric anal sphincter injury: incidence, risk factors, and management.产科肛门括约肌损伤:发生率、危险因素及处理
Ann Surg. 2008 Feb;247(2):224-37. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318142cdf4.
9
A validation of the diagnosis of obstetric sphincter tears in two Norwegian databases, the Medical Birth Registry and the Patient Administration System.在挪威的两个数据库(医学出生登记处和患者管理系统)中对产科括约肌撕裂诊断的验证。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(2):205-9. doi: 10.1080/00016340601111364.
10
Episiotomy rates around the world: an update.世界各地的会阴切开术发生率:最新情况
Birth. 2005 Sep;32(3):219-23. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00373.x.