• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特刊引言:加拿大医疗保健中的不稳定团结与优先获得权

Introduction to the Special Issue: Precarious Solidarity-Preferential Access in Canadian Health Care.

作者信息

Reid Lynette

机构信息

Department of Bioethics, Dalhousie University, PO Box 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.

出版信息

Health Care Anal. 2017 Jun;25(2):107-113. doi: 10.1007/s10728-016-0338-y.

DOI:10.1007/s10728-016-0338-y
PMID:28074373
Abstract

Systems of universal health coverage may aspire to provide care based on need and not ability to pay; the complexities of this aspiration (conceptual, practical, and ethical) call for normative analysis. This special issue arises in the wake of a judicial inquiry into preferential access in the Canadian province of Alberta, the Vertes Commission. I describe this inquiry and set out a taxonomy of forms of differential and preferential access. Papers in this special issue focus on the conceptual specification of health system boundaries (the concept of medical need) and on the normative questions raised by complex models of funding and delivery of care, where patients, providers, and services cross system boundaries.

摘要

全民健康覆盖体系可能旨在根据需求而非支付能力提供医疗服务;这一目标(概念、实践和伦理方面)的复杂性需要进行规范性分析。本期特刊是在加拿大艾伯塔省针对优先获得医疗服务展开司法调查(韦尔特斯委员会)之后产生的。我将介绍此次调查,并列出差别性和优先性医疗服务获取形式的分类。本期特刊中的论文聚焦于卫生系统边界的概念界定(医疗需求概念)以及由复杂的医疗资金筹集和服务提供模式引发的规范性问题,在这些模式中,患者、提供者和服务跨越了系统边界。

相似文献

1
Introduction to the Special Issue: Precarious Solidarity-Preferential Access in Canadian Health Care.特刊引言:加拿大医疗保健中的不稳定团结与优先获得权
Health Care Anal. 2017 Jun;25(2):107-113. doi: 10.1007/s10728-016-0338-y.
2
How Medical Tourism Enables Preferential Access to Care: Four Patterns from the Canadian Context.医疗旅游如何实现优先获得医疗服务:来自加拿大背景的四种模式。
Health Care Anal. 2017 Jun;25(2):138-150. doi: 10.1007/s10728-015-0312-0.
3
Health workers' perceptions of access to care for children and pregnant women with precarious immigration status: health as a right or a privilege?卫生工作者对脆弱移民身份的儿童和孕妇获得医疗保健的看法:健康是一项权利还是一种特权?
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Sep;93:78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.008. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
4
What can the Canadians and Americans learn from each other's health care systems?加拿大人和美国人可以从彼此的医疗保健系统中学到什么?
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2016 Jul;31(3):349-70. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2374. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
5
[Using the concept of universal health coverage to promote the health system reform in China].[利用全民健康覆盖理念推动中国卫生系统改革]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Nov 6;50(11):932-935. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2016.11.002.
6
Disability in two health care systems: access, quality, satisfaction, and physician contacts among working-age Canadians and Americans with disabilities.两种医疗保健系统中的残疾状况:有残疾的加拿大和美国工作年龄人群在获得医疗服务、医疗质量、满意度和医生接触方面的情况。
Disabil Health J. 2008 Oct;1(4):196-208. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.07.006.
7
[What is the real cost of universal health care in Haiti?].
Sante Publique. 2012 Sep-Oct;24(5):453-8.
8
Progress towards universal coverage: the health systems of Ghana, South Africa and Tanzania.迈向全民覆盖的进展:加纳、南非和坦桑尼亚的卫生系统。
Health Policy Plan. 2012 Mar;27 Suppl 1:i4-12. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs002.
9
Do as I say, not as I do: a survey of public impressions of queue-jumping and preferential access.照我说的做,别照我做的做:一项关于公众对插队和优先通行看法的调查。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2007 Oct;14(5):260-4. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32825f54a4.
10
Canadian health care: a question of access.加拿大医疗保健:一个获取机会的问题。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Oct;127(10):1384-6. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.275.

引用本文的文献

1
Space, place and (waiting) time: reflections on health policy and politics.空间、地点与(等待的)时间:关于卫生政策与政治的思考
Health Econ Policy Law. 2018 Jul;13(3-4):226-250. doi: 10.1017/S1744133117000366. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
2
Medical Need: Evaluating a Conceptual Critique of Universal Health Coverage.医疗需求:评估对全民健康覆盖的概念性批判
Health Care Anal. 2017 Jun;25(2):114-137. doi: 10.1007/s10728-016-0325-3.
3
Concierge, Wellness, and Block Fee Models of Primary Care: Ethical and Regulatory Concerns at the Public-Private Boundary.

本文引用的文献

1
No Longer Home Alone? Home Care and the Canada Health Act.不再独自在家?家庭护理与《加拿大健康法案》。
Health Care Anal. 2017 Jun;25(2):168-189. doi: 10.1007/s10728-016-0336-0.
2
Medical Need: Evaluating a Conceptual Critique of Universal Health Coverage.医疗需求:评估对全民健康覆盖的概念性批判
Health Care Anal. 2017 Jun;25(2):114-137. doi: 10.1007/s10728-016-0325-3.
3
Concierge, Wellness, and Block Fee Models of Primary Care: Ethical and Regulatory Concerns at the Public-Private Boundary.初级保健的礼宾、健康和包干费用模式:公私边界的伦理与监管问题
初级保健的礼宾、健康和包干费用模式:公私边界的伦理与监管问题
Health Care Anal. 2017 Jun;25(2):151-167. doi: 10.1007/s10728-016-0324-4.
Health Care Anal. 2017 Jun;25(2):151-167. doi: 10.1007/s10728-016-0324-4.
4
How Medical Tourism Enables Preferential Access to Care: Four Patterns from the Canadian Context.医疗旅游如何实现优先获得医疗服务:来自加拿大背景的四种模式。
Health Care Anal. 2017 Jun;25(2):138-150. doi: 10.1007/s10728-015-0312-0.
5
Achieving equity within universal health coverage: a narrative review of progress and resources for measuring success.在全民健康覆盖范围内实现公平:对衡量成功的进展和资源的叙述性综述
Int J Equity Health. 2014 Oct 10;13:72. doi: 10.1186/s12939-014-0072-8.
6
Just healthcare? The moral failure of single-tier basic healthcare.仅仅是医疗保健吗?单层基本医疗保健的道德失败。
J Med Philos. 2015 Apr;40(2):152-68. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhu077. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
7
Canadian pharmacare: looking back, looking forward.加拿大药物保险计划:回顾与展望。
Healthc Policy. 2012 Aug;8(1):14-23.
8
Ethical concerns related to grateful patient philanthropy: the physician's perspective.与感激的患者慈善行为相关的伦理问题:医生的观点。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 May;28(5):645-51. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2246-7. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
9
Ethics in radiology: wait lists queue jumping.放射科的伦理问题:等待名单插队。
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2013 Aug;64(3):170-5. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2011.12.006. Epub 2012 Aug 4.
10
Caring for VIPs: nine principles.关爱 VIP:九条原则。
Cleve Clin J Med. 2011 Feb;78(2):90-4. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.78a.10113.