• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修订创伤评分、损伤严重度评分和创伤与损伤严重度评分在老年创伤患者死亡率预测中的比较

Comparison of Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score and Trauma and Injury Severity Score for mortality prediction in elderly trauma patients.

作者信息

Yousefzadeh-Chabok Shahrokh, Hosseinpour Marieh, Kouchakinejad-Eramsadati Leila, Ranjbar Fatemeh, Malekpouri Reza, Razzaghi Alireza, Mohtasham-Amiri Zahra

机构信息

Guilan Road Trauma Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht-Iran, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht-Iran.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2016 Nov;22(6):536-540. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2016.93288.

DOI:10.5505/tjtes.2016.93288
PMID:28074459
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trauma is the fifth leading cause of death in patients 65 years and older. This study is a comparison of results of Revised Trauma Score (RTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) in prediction of mortality in cases of geriatric trauma.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study of records of 352 elderly trauma patients who were admitted to Pour-Sina Hospital in Rasht between 2010 and 2011. Injury scoring systems were compared in terms of specificity, sensitivity, and cut-off points using receiver operating characteristic curve of patient prognosis.

RESULTS

Mean age of patients was 71.5 years. Most common mechanism of injury was traffic accident (53.7%). Of the total, 13.9% of patients died. Mean ISS was higher for patients who did not survive. Mean of TRISS and RTS scores in elderly survivors was higher than non-survivors and difference in all 3 scores was statistically significant (p<0.001). Best cut-off points for predicting mortality in elderly trauma patients in RTS, ISS, and TRISS systems were ≤6, ≥13.5, and ≤2, with sensitivity of 99%, 84%, and 95% and specificity of 62%, 62%, and 72%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

TRISS was the strongest predictor of mortality in elderly trauma patients as result of combination of both anatomical and physiological parameters.

摘要

背景

创伤是65岁及以上患者死亡的第五大主要原因。本研究比较了修订创伤评分(RTS)、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)和创伤与损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)在预测老年创伤患者死亡率方面的结果。

方法

这是一项对2010年至2011年期间入住拉什特市普尔 - 西纳医院的352例老年创伤患者记录的横断面研究。使用患者预后的受试者工作特征曲线,从特异性、敏感性和临界点方面比较损伤评分系统。

结果

患者的平均年龄为71.5岁。最常见的损伤机制是交通事故(53.7%)。总共有13.9%的患者死亡。未存活患者的平均ISS更高。老年幸存者的TRISS和RTS评分均值高于非幸存者,且所有三项评分的差异均具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。RTS、ISS和TRISS系统中预测老年创伤患者死亡率的最佳临界点分别为≤6、≥13.5和≤2,敏感性分别为99%、84%和95%,特异性分别为62%、62%和72%。

结论

由于结合了解剖学和生理学参数,TRISS是老年创伤患者死亡率最强的预测指标。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score and Trauma and Injury Severity Score for mortality prediction in elderly trauma patients.修订创伤评分、损伤严重度评分和创伤与损伤严重度评分在老年创伤患者死亡率预测中的比较
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2016 Nov;22(6):536-540. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2016.93288.
2
Comparison of trauma scores for predicting mortality and morbidity on trauma patients.创伤评分在预测创伤患者死亡率和发病率方面的比较。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2014 Jul;20(4):258-64. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2014.22725.
3
Should the New Injury Severity Score replace the Injury Severity Score in the Trauma and Injury Severity Score?在创伤和损伤严重程度评分中,新损伤严重程度评分是否应取代损伤严重程度评分?
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2008 Oct;14(4):308-12.
4
Comparison of Injury Severity Score, New Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score and Trauma and Injury Severity Score for Mortality Prediction in Elderly Trauma Patients.损伤严重度评分、新损伤严重度评分、修订创伤评分及创伤和损伤严重度评分在老年创伤患者死亡率预测中的比较
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019 Feb;23(2):73-77. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23120.
5
Correlation Between the Revised Trauma Score and Injury Severity Score: Implications for Prehospital Trauma Triage.修订创伤评分与损伤严重程度评分之间的相关性:对院前创伤分诊的启示
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Mar-Apr;23(2):263-270. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1489019. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
6
A comparison of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and the Trauma-Injury Severity Score (TRISS) for outcome assessment in intensive care unit trauma patients.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)II评分与创伤严重程度评分(TRISS)在重症监护病房创伤患者预后评估中的比较。
Crit Care Med. 1996 Oct;24(10):1642-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199610000-00007.
7
A comparison of "life threatening injury" concept in the Turkish Penal Code and trauma scoring systems.土耳其刑法典中“危及生命的伤害”概念与创伤评分系统的比较。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2007 Jul;13(3):192-8.
8
Comparison of trauma scoring systems for predicting mortality in firearm injuries.用于预测火器伤死亡率的创伤评分系统比较
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2009 Nov;15(6):559-64.
9
Comparing NEWS2, TRISS, and RTS in predicting mortality rate in trauma patients based on prehospital data set: a diagnostic study.比较基于院前数据集的 NEWS2、TRISS 和 RTS 在预测创伤患者死亡率方面的表现:一项诊断研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Sep 9;24(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01084-w.
10
The Reverse Shock Index Multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale Score (rSIG) and Prediction of Mortality Outcome in Adult Trauma Patients: A Cross-Sectional Analysis Based on Registered Trauma Data.反向休克指数乘以格拉斯哥昏迷评分(rSIG)与成人创伤患者死亡率预测的关系:基于注册创伤数据的横断面分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 24;15(11):2346. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112346.

引用本文的文献

1
Mortality prediction in geriatric patients with multiple trauma presenting by ambulance.老年多发伤患者经救护车转运时的死亡率预测
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2025 Aug;31(8):739-746. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2025.42574.
2
Evaluation of emergency department admissions of mass casualty patients using the revised trauma score, injury severity score, and trauma and injury severity score.应用改良创伤评分、创伤严重度评分和创伤与损伤严重度评分评估大批伤员患者的急诊科入院情况。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024 Mar;30(3):192-202. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.73531.
3
Performance of trauma scoring systems in predicting mortality in geriatric trauma patients: comparison of the ISS, TRISS, and GTOS based on a systemic review and meta-analysis.
创伤评分系统在预测老年创伤患者死亡率中的性能:基于系统评价和荟萃分析比较 ISS、TRISS 和 GTOS。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug;50(4):1453-1465. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02467-1. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
4
Evaluation of the trauma-specific frailty index in geriatric trauma patients according to the new World Health Organization age classification.根据世界卫生组织新的年龄分类对老年创伤患者的创伤特异性衰弱指数进行评估。
North Clin Istanb. 2023 Nov 3;10(6):711-717. doi: 10.14744/nci.2022.65785. eCollection 2023.
5
Predictors of mortality in patients with geriatric trauma in the emergency service.急诊科老年创伤患者死亡的预测因素。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 Jul 17;69(7):e20230035. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20230035. eCollection 2023.
6
Use of the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) as a Predictor of Patient Outcome in Cases of Trauma Presenting in the Trauma and Emergency Department of a Tertiary Care Institute.在一家三级医疗机构的创伤与急诊科,使用创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)作为创伤病例患者预后的预测指标。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 14;15(6):e40410. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40410. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Development and Asian-wide validation of the Grade for Interpretable Field Triage (GIFT) for predicting mortality in pre-hospital patients using the Pan-Asian Trauma Outcomes Study (PATOS).利用泛亚创伤结局研究(PATOS)开发用于预测院前患者死亡率的可解释现场分诊分级(GIFT)并在亚洲范围内进行验证。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Mar 4;34:100733. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100733. eCollection 2023 May.
8
Assessment of serum glucose potassium ratio as a predictor for morbidity and mortality of blunt abdominal trauma.评估血清葡萄糖钾比值作为钝性腹部创伤发病率和死亡率的预测指标。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Jan;28(2):134-139. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.88945.
9
Correlation between trauma and injury severity score and prognosis in patients with trauma.创伤患者创伤与损伤严重程度评分及预后的相关性
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2021 Jul 10;16(6):807-811. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2021.06.005. eCollection 2021 Dec.
10
Predicting mortality in trauma patients - A retrospective comparison of the performance of six scoring systems applied to polytrauma patients from the emergency centre of a South African central hospital.预测创伤患者的死亡率——对应用于南非一家中心医院急诊科多发伤患者的六种评分系统性能的回顾性比较
Afr J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;11(4):453-458. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2021.09.001. Epub 2021 Oct 28.