• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年多发伤患者经救护车转运时的死亡率预测

Mortality prediction in geriatric patients with multiple trauma presenting by ambulance.

作者信息

Yurtseven Aynur, Kayıpmaz Afşin Emre

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Etlik State Hospital Faculty of Health Sciences, Ankara-Türkiye.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2025 Aug;31(8):739-746. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2025.42574.

DOI:10.14744/tjtes.2025.42574
PMID:40765188
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Modified 5-Factor Frailty Index (mFI-5) has been shown to predict complications following treatment in geriatric patients. However, few studies have compared the mFI-5 with other trauma scoring systems in cases involving multiple injuries. This study aimed to evaluate the Relationship Between mFI-5, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS) and their association with mortality in geriatric trauma patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 65 and older who were admitted to the emergency trauma unit of a tertiary care hospital. Data collected included laboratory parameters, imaging results, blood transfusion requirements, hospitalization status, intensive care unit admission, surgical intervention, ISS, GTOS, mFI-5 scores, and mortality outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 241 patients were included, with a mean age of 78.12 (±8.34) years. Falls were the most common cause of trauma (n=142, 58.9%). Thoracic injuries were the most frequently observed (n=86, 53.7%). Patients who died within the first 24 hours of admission had significantly higher ISS (14.1 vs. 26.33), GTOS (119.02 vs. 157.33), and mFI-5 (2.53 vs. 3.33) scores (p=0.001, p=0.001, and p=0.017, respectively). Similar trends were noted for one-month and three-month mortality (p=0.001 for all).

CONCLUSION

Scoring systems are essential for early mortality prediction in geriatric trauma patients. ISS, GTOS, and mFI-5 scores have shown similar effectiveness in predicting comorbidities, intensive care unit admission, and mortality in geriatric trauma patients. ISS involves a complex calculation, while GTOS, although specifically designed for geriatric patients, requires additional computations based on the ISS. In contrast, mFI-5 may be more practical in emergency settings because it is easy to calculate.

摘要

背景

改良5因素衰弱指数(mFI-5)已被证明可预测老年患者治疗后的并发症。然而,在涉及多处损伤的病例中,很少有研究将mFI-5与其他创伤评分系统进行比较。本研究旨在评估mFI-5、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)和老年创伤结局评分(GTOS)之间的关系及其与老年创伤患者死亡率的关联。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究纳入了入住三级护理医院急诊创伤科的65岁及以上患者。收集的数据包括实验室参数、影像学结果、输血需求、住院状况、重症监护病房入住情况、手术干预、ISS、GTOS、mFI-5评分和死亡率结局。

结果

共纳入241例患者,平均年龄为78.12(±8.34)岁。跌倒为最常见的创伤原因(n=142,58.9%)。胸部损伤最为常见(n=86,53.7%)。入院后24小时内死亡的患者ISS(14.1对26.33)、GTOS(119.02对157.33)和mFI-5(2.53对3.33)评分显著更高(p分别为0.001、0.001和0.017)。1个月和3个月死亡率也呈现类似趋势(均p=0.001)。

结论

评分系统对老年创伤患者的早期死亡率预测至关重要。ISS、GTOS和mFI-5评分在预测老年创伤患者的合并症、重症监护病房入住情况和死亡率方面显示出相似的有效性。ISS涉及复杂计算,而GTOS虽专为老年患者设计,但需基于ISS进行额外计算。相比之下,mFI-5在急诊环境中可能更实用,因为其计算简便。

相似文献

1
Mortality prediction in geriatric patients with multiple trauma presenting by ambulance.老年多发伤患者经救护车转运时的死亡率预测
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2025 Aug;31(8):739-746. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2025.42574.
2
Predicting mortality and intensive care needs in geriatric trauma patients: A ROC analysis of frailty and trauma scoring systems.预测老年创伤患者的死亡率和重症监护需求:脆弱性与创伤评分系统的ROC分析
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jul 21;51(1):262. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02924-5.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Assessing the Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score: A National Analysis.评估老年创伤结局评分:一项全国性分析。
Am Surg. 2025 Aug;91(8):1238-1243. doi: 10.1177/00031348251350990. Epub 2025 Jun 10.
5
Enhancing geriatric trauma mortality prediction: Modifying and assessing the Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score with net benefit and decision curve analysis.提高老年创伤死亡率预测:通过净效益和决策曲线分析修改和评估老年创伤结局评分
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Jun;32(6):668-680. doi: 10.1111/acem.15103. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
6
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
7
Helicopter emergency medical services for adults with major trauma.为严重创伤的成年人提供直升机紧急医疗服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28(3):CD009228. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009228.pub2.
8
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome全身炎症反应综合征
9
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
10
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Mortality in the United States, 2023.美国2023年的死亡率。
NCHS Data Brief. 2024 Dec(521). doi: 10.15620/cdc/170564.
2
Outcomes of severe isolated blunt chest trauma in young and geriatric patients.年轻患者和老年患者严重孤立性钝性胸部创伤的转归。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Oct;50(5):2471-2480. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02611-x. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
3
Does the Clinical Frailty Scale at Triage Predict Outcomes From Emergency Care for Older People?分诊时的临床虚弱量表是否能预测老年人急诊治疗的结局?
Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Jun;77(6):620-627. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
4
Characteristics, injuries, and clinical outcomes of geriatric trauma patients in Japan: an analysis of the nationwide trauma registry database.日本老年创伤患者的特征、损伤和临床结局:全国创伤登记数据库分析。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 5;10(1):19148. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76149-4.
5
A Prospective Comparison of Frailty Scores and Fall Prediction in Acutely Injured Older Adults.一项对急性损伤老年患者衰弱评分和跌倒预测的前瞻性比较。
J Surg Res. 2021 Jan;257:326-332. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.08.007. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
6
Geriatric Screening, Triage Urgency, and 30-Day Mortality in Older Emergency Department Patients.老年患者急诊筛查、分诊紧急程度与 30 天死亡率
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Aug;68(8):1755-1762. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16427. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
7
The evaluation of geriatric patients who presented with trauma to the emergency department.对急诊科收治的老年创伤患者的评估。
Arch Med Sci. 2019 Sep;15(5):1261-1268. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2017.69636. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
8
New 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index Using American College of Surgeons NSQIP Data.基于美国外科医师学会 NSQIP 数据的新 5 因素修正衰弱指数。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Feb;226(2):173-181.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
9
Guidance when Applying the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) to the Geriatric Patient: Executive Summary.将加拿大分诊与 acuity 量表(CTAS)应用于老年患者的指南:执行摘要。
CJEM. 2017 Jul;19(S2):S28-S37. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.363.
10
Comparison of Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score and Trauma and Injury Severity Score for mortality prediction in elderly trauma patients.修订创伤评分、损伤严重度评分和创伤与损伤严重度评分在老年创伤患者死亡率预测中的比较
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2016 Nov;22(6):536-540. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2016.93288.