Yurtseven Aynur, Kayıpmaz Afşin Emre
Department of Emergency Medicine, Etlik State Hospital Faculty of Health Sciences, Ankara-Türkiye.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2025 Aug;31(8):739-746. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2025.42574.
The Modified 5-Factor Frailty Index (mFI-5) has been shown to predict complications following treatment in geriatric patients. However, few studies have compared the mFI-5 with other trauma scoring systems in cases involving multiple injuries. This study aimed to evaluate the Relationship Between mFI-5, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS) and their association with mortality in geriatric trauma patients.
This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 65 and older who were admitted to the emergency trauma unit of a tertiary care hospital. Data collected included laboratory parameters, imaging results, blood transfusion requirements, hospitalization status, intensive care unit admission, surgical intervention, ISS, GTOS, mFI-5 scores, and mortality outcomes.
A total of 241 patients were included, with a mean age of 78.12 (±8.34) years. Falls were the most common cause of trauma (n=142, 58.9%). Thoracic injuries were the most frequently observed (n=86, 53.7%). Patients who died within the first 24 hours of admission had significantly higher ISS (14.1 vs. 26.33), GTOS (119.02 vs. 157.33), and mFI-5 (2.53 vs. 3.33) scores (p=0.001, p=0.001, and p=0.017, respectively). Similar trends were noted for one-month and three-month mortality (p=0.001 for all).
Scoring systems are essential for early mortality prediction in geriatric trauma patients. ISS, GTOS, and mFI-5 scores have shown similar effectiveness in predicting comorbidities, intensive care unit admission, and mortality in geriatric trauma patients. ISS involves a complex calculation, while GTOS, although specifically designed for geriatric patients, requires additional computations based on the ISS. In contrast, mFI-5 may be more practical in emergency settings because it is easy to calculate.
改良5因素衰弱指数(mFI-5)已被证明可预测老年患者治疗后的并发症。然而,在涉及多处损伤的病例中,很少有研究将mFI-5与其他创伤评分系统进行比较。本研究旨在评估mFI-5、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)和老年创伤结局评分(GTOS)之间的关系及其与老年创伤患者死亡率的关联。
这项回顾性队列研究纳入了入住三级护理医院急诊创伤科的65岁及以上患者。收集的数据包括实验室参数、影像学结果、输血需求、住院状况、重症监护病房入住情况、手术干预、ISS、GTOS、mFI-5评分和死亡率结局。
共纳入241例患者,平均年龄为78.12(±8.34)岁。跌倒为最常见的创伤原因(n=142,58.9%)。胸部损伤最为常见(n=86,53.7%)。入院后24小时内死亡的患者ISS(14.1对26.33)、GTOS(119.02对157.33)和mFI-5(2.53对3.33)评分显著更高(p分别为0.001、0.001和0.017)。1个月和3个月死亡率也呈现类似趋势(均p=0.001)。
评分系统对老年创伤患者的早期死亡率预测至关重要。ISS、GTOS和mFI-5评分在预测老年创伤患者的合并症、重症监护病房入住情况和死亡率方面显示出相似的有效性。ISS涉及复杂计算,而GTOS虽专为老年患者设计,但需基于ISS进行额外计算。相比之下,mFI-5在急诊环境中可能更实用,因为其计算简便。